UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant  ☒

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant

Check the appropriate box:

Preliminary Proxy Statement
Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
Definitive Proxy Statement
Definitive Additional Materials
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

FOOT LOCKER, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

No fee required.
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 

 

 

(1)

 

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

 

 

(2)

 

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

 

 

(3)

 

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

 

 

 

(4)

 

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

 

 

 

(5)

 

Total fee paid:

 

 

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 

 

(1)

 

Amount Previously Paid:

 

 

 

 

(2)

 

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

 

 

 

(3)

 

Filing Party:

 

 

 

 

(4)

 

Date Filed:

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

TO INSPIRE AND EMPOWER 2022 PROXY STATEMENT

 

FOOT LOCKER, INC. ENHANCED ITS POSITIONING IN NORTH AMERICA WITH ACQUISITION OF WSS, AND ACCELERATED ASIA-PACIFIC EXPANSION WITH ACQUISITION OF ATMOS

is an athletically-inspired retailer focused on the large and rapidly growing Hispanic consumer demographic, operating a fleet of off-mall stores in key markets across California, Texas, Arizona, and Nevada. WSS’s community-driven business benefits from deep relationships with customers– with approximately 80% of its sales coming from customers who are members of its loyalty program. Foot Locker, Inc. benefits from WSS’s differentiated market position and complementary customer base and real estate portfolio. WSS’s assortment of classic styles further diversifies Foot Locker, Inc.’s product mix, enabling the Company to serve a broader range of consumer needs across price points.

is a culturally-connected brand featuring premium sneakers and apparel, an exclusive in-house label, collaborative relationships with leading vendors in the sneaker ecosystem, experiential stores, and a robust omni-channel platform. This acquisition accelerates Foot Locker, Inc.’s global reach with a highly-strategic foothold in Japan, extends the Company’s premium and top-tier offerings, and increases its digital penetration.

 

 

330 West 34th Street

New York, New York 10001

April 12, 2019

Dear Fellow Shareholders:

Last year, I highlighted how our customers’ rapidly-changing preferences and shopping behaviors–fueled by access to information, influences, and ideas from around the world–were challenging for our Company and the broader retail industry. This year, I am pleased to report that, by focusing on our commitment to elevate the customer experience across each of our channels and leveraging our strategic brand partnerships, we continued to differentiate our business and build positive momentum through each quarter of 2018. In 2019, we will continue to build on our strengths and seize opportunities to evolve our business by developing our internal assets and expanding into new markets.

 

New Strategic Framework. As we analyzed the ways in which our customers’ expectations have changed, it became clear to us that we needed to evolve in order to remain relevant and connected to our customers. To address this need, we redefined our purpose from being the leading global retailer of athletically inspired shoes and apparel toinspiring and empowering youth culture. We believe that we can achieve that vision at the heart of the sport and sneaker communities by leveraging our newcustomer connectedstrategic framework through the following five essential touchpoints—our Five Cs:

Everything we do starts with the customer. Our new strategic framework is built on knowing, engaging, and serving our customers–wherever and however they want to interact with us–in store or online. By executing against this framework, we believe we will have the focus and tools to achieve our four key strategic imperatives:

DEFINED TERMSii
  
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTSiii
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING1
MESSAGE FROM OUR CHAIRMAN AND CEO3
ABOUT FOOT LOCKER, INC.5
Inspire and Empower Youth Culture5
Our Strategic Imperatives5
Our ESG Program6
Our Climate Stewardship6
Our Fiscal 2021 Highlights7
Emerging Stronger from the COVID-19 Pandemic7
Learn More About Our Company7
VOTING ROADMAP8
RECOGNITION13
  
elevate the
customer experiencePROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
invest for
long-term growth
drive productivityleverage the power
of our people15

New Long-Term Objectives. We have established new long-term financial targets for the 2019-23 period. Overall, we continue to aspire to consistently be a top quartile performer, with:

Sales

Mid-Single Digit

Compounded

Annual Growth Rate

Director Nominees

Sales per Gross

Square Foot

$525 - $575

15
Director Qualifications

Earnings Before

Interest and Taxes Margin

Low Double-Digits*

15
Director Nominees at a Glance

Net Income Margin

High-Single

Digit

16
Director Nominees’ Skillset Matrix

Return on

Invested Capital

Mid-Teens

Inventory

Turnover

3-4 Times*

*Because these non-GAAP measures are uncertain, these amounts have not been reconciled to GAAP.

Welcome to the Foot Locker, Inc. 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

Investing in our Future. Throughout 2018, we allocated a significant portion of our capital and operating spending on enhancing our digital and logistics capabilities. In total, we invested $187 million into the business through our capital program in 2018. We have increased the program to $275 million for 2019 with a focus on the evolution of our store fleet—including more than a dozen new Power Store locations—and the further development of our digital and logistics capabilities. We are constantly looking at new ways to elevate the customer experience and harness the energy of youth culture. With these goals and our strategic imperatives in mind, we have invested $139 million to date in the following strategic minority investments:

Carbon38 – a destination for women’s luxury activewear

GOAT Group – a managed marketplace for customers to buy and sell authentic sneakers

PENSOLE – a footwear design academy that, together with us and our vendor partners, will collaborate on new educational programs and the design and manufacture of exclusive products

Rockets of Awesome – a children’s direct-to-customer apparel company

Super Heroic – a lifestyle brand that designs, manufactures, and markets children’s footwear, clothing, and accessories

Expansion into Asia. This past year marked an important milestone for the Company, as we announced our expansion into Asia, reinforcing our commitment to bring sneaker culture to customers around the globe. To date, we have opened five stores and launched our digital channels across Singapore, Hong Kong, and Malaysia. In addition, we entered China through a limited offering in partnership with TMall (a Chinese business-to-consumer online retailer). Building upon that energy and passion for our brand and offerings, we’ve identified the need to evolve our organizational structure to support an accelerated growth strategy for the region. We opened an Asian headquarters in Singapore and realigned our organization into three distinct geographic regions: Europe, Middle East & Africa (EMEA), led by Vijay Talwar; Asia Pacific, led by Lewis P. Kimble; and North America, continues to be led by Stephen D. “Jake” Jacobs.

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Highlights.The Company and the Board of Directors (the “Board”) are focused on corporate social responsibility. Our ESG priorities are centered on:

23
  
GOVERNANCE25
Our Board of Directors25
Our Board’s Oversight of Our Business33
Shareholder Engagement38
Communications with the Board39
Majority Voting in the Election of Directors39
Proxy Access39
BOARD OF DIRECTORS40
Committees41
Director Compensation43
Directors and Officers Indemnification and Insurance47
  
OpportunityPROPOSAL 2: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE NEO COMPENSATIONCommunityWorker DignitySustainability49

 

We continuously look for new and better ways to foster a diverse and inclusive work environment, engage our surrounding communities, improve employee safety, and minimize our environmental impact, all while creating value for our shareholders.

Shareholder Engagement. We extended our proactive shareholder engagement program in 2018. These meetings provide an important platform to receive feedback from investors and are in addition to our Investor Relations team’s ongoing efforts. We believe this engagement program promotes transparency between the Board and our shareholders and builds informed and productive relationships. We appreciate this dialogue and the feedback we received and are committed to maintaining open lines of communication with shareholders.

The Notice of 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement contain details of the business to be conducted at the 2019 Annual Meeting.

Your vote is very important to us, so regardless of whether you attend the meeting, please vote your shares.

This is an exciting time for Foot Locker, Inc. We are proud of what we accomplished in 2018, but we are just getting started on our new journey toinspire and empower youth culture. By focusing on our strategic imperatives, leveraging our global presence, and putting the customer at the center of everything we do, we believe we will build upon last year’s momentum and deliver against our updated long-term goals. I look forward to sharing our success with each of you at the 2019 Annual Meeting.

Sincerely,

    EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Richard A. Johnson

Chairman, President50

Compensation Discussion and

Chief Executive Officer

Analysis
50

330 West 34th Street

New York, New York 10001

Human Capital Committee Report69
Human Capital Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation69
Compensation and Risk69
Summary Compensation Table70
Employment Agreements and Other Arrangements72
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 202174
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2021 Year-End78
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal 202187
Pension Benefits in Fiscal 202187
Defined Benefit Retirement Plans88
401(k) Plan90
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation in Fiscal 202191
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control92
CEO Pay Ratio95
 
ESG96
  
Date and TimePROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE ON FREQUENCY OF SAY-ON-PAY VOTESLocationRecord Date98
PROPOSAL 4: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM99
Audit and Non-Audit Fees100
Audit Committee Preapproval Policies and Procedures100
Audit Committee Report101
SHARE OWNERSHIP102
Directors and Executive Officers102
Principal Shareholders103
DEADLINES AND PROCEDURES FOR NOMINATIONS AND SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 2023 ANNUAL MEETING104
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS105
HELPFUL RESOURCES107

2022PROXY STATEMENT

May 22, 2019 at 9:00 a.m.,

Eastern Daylight Time (“EDT”)i

NYC33, 1251165(e) Plan

Foot Locker Puerto Rico 1165(e) Plan, as amended and restated
401(k) PlanFoot Locker 401(k) Plan, as amended and restated
Annual Incentive PlanFoot Locker Executive Incentive Cash Compensation Plan
Annual Meeting2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
Annual ReportAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 29, 2022
BoardBoard of Directors
CACMConsistently Applied Compensation Measure
CAPCompensation Advisory Partners
CCPACalifornia Consumer Privacy Act
CD&ACompensation Discussion and Analysis
Common StockFoot Locker’s Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
Company/Foot LockerFoot Locker, Inc.
Corporate Headquarters330 West 33rd34th Street,
New York, New York 10001
DIBsDiversity, Inclusion, and Belonging
DSUDeferred Stock Unit (an accounting equivalent of one share of Common Stock)
DTCDirect-to-Customer
EDTEastern Daylight Time
ERGEmployee Resource Group
ERISAEmployee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended
ESGEnvironmental, Social, and Governance
ESPP2013 Foot Locker Employees Stock Purchase Plan
Excess Cash PlanFoot Locker Excess Cash Balance Plan
Excess Savings PlanFoot Locker Excess Savings Plan
Exchange ActSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board
FDRAFootwear Distributors and Retailers of America
Finance CommitteeFinance and Investment Oversight Committee
GAAPU.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
GDPREU General Data Protection Regulation
GHGGreenhouse Gas
Human Capital CommitteeHuman Capital and Compensation Committee
IAPInternational Assignment Policy
Interest Accounta hypothetical investment account bearing interest at the rate of 120% of the applicable federal long-term rate, compounded annually, and set as of the first day of each plan year
IRCInternal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
LEEDLeading in Education and Economic Development
LTIFoot Locker Long-Term Incentive Program
NACDNational Association of Corporate Directors
NEONamed Executive Officer
NoticeNotice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials
NPSNet Promoter Score
NYSENew York Stock Exchange
PCAOBPublic Company Accounting Oversight Board
PSUPerformance Stock Unit
Record DateMarch 21, 2022
Responsibility CommitteeNominating and Corporate Responsibility Committee
Retirement PlanFoot Locker Retirement Plan, as amended and restated
RILARetail Industry Leaders Association
ROICReturn on Invested Capital
RSURestricted Stock Unit (time-based)
SASBSustainability Accounting Standards Board
SECU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
SERPFoot Locker Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated
Stock Incentive PlanFoot Locker 2007 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated
TCFDTask Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures
TSRTotal Shareholder Return
VIFVoting Instruction Form

ii   (see page 76 for directions
to the 2019 Annual Meeting)

    Foot Locker, Inc.

This Proxy Statement contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. securities laws. Other than statements of historical facts, all statements that address activities, events, or developments that the Company anticipates will or may occur in the future, including, but not limited to, future merchandise and vendor mix, real estate opportunities, acquisitions, strategic partnerships, capital expenditures, dividend payments, share repurchases, strategic plans, financial objectives, growth of the Company’s business and operations, and other such matters, are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on many assumptions and factors, which are detailed in the Company’s filings with the SEC.

These forward-looking statements are based largely on our expectations and judgments and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are unforeseeable and beyond our control. For additional discussion on risks and uncertainties that may affect forward-looking statements, see “Risk Factors” disclosed in the Annual Report and subsequent filings with the SEC. Any changes in such assumptions or factors could produce significantly different results. The Company undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. Website references throughout this Proxy Statement are provided for convenience only, and the content on the referenced websites is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement.

 


2022PROXY STATEMENT

iii

This page intentionally left blank.

 DATE AND TIME
May 18, 2022 at
9:00 a.m. EDT
 VIRTUAL
MEETING SITE
virtualshareholdermeeting.com/FL2022
 RECORD DATE
Shareholders of record as of
March 25, 201921, 2022 can vote at this meeting


Items of Business

ProposalBoard’s Voting Recommendation
Elect ten members to the Board to serve for one-year terms✓  FORAnnual Meetingeach nominee
Approve, on an advisory basis, our named executive officers’ (“NEOs”) compensation✓  FOR
Ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2019 fiscal year✓ FOR

 

Transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting and at any adjournment or postponement of the meeting

Proxy Voting

You may vote using any of the following methods:

Telephone

If you are located within the United States or Canada, you may vote your shares by calling 800-690-6903 and following the recorded instructions. Telephone voting is available 24 hours a day and will be accessible until 11:59 p.m. EDT on May 21, 2019. The telephone voting system has easy to follow instructions and allows you to confirm that the system has properly recorded your vote. If you vote by telephone, you do NOT need to return a proxy card or voting instruction form.

Scanning

You may scan the QR Code provided to you to vote your shares through the internet with your mobile device. Internet voting is available 24 hours a day and will be accessible until 11:59 p.m. EDT on May 21, 2019. You will be able to confirm that the system has properly recorded your vote. If you scan your QR code to vote, you do NOT need to return a proxy card or voting instruction form.

Ballot

You may vote by ballot at the Annual Meeting if you decide to attend in person. If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record, you must obtain a proxy, executed in your favor, from the holder of record to be able to vote at the meeting. If you plan to vote by ballot at the Annual Meeting, you do NOT need to return a proxy card or voting instruction form.

Internet

You may vote your shares through the internet atproxyvote.com. Internet voting is available 24 hours a day and will be accessible until 11:59 p.m. EDT on May 21, 2019. As with telephone voting, you will be able to confirm that the system has properly recorded your vote. If you vote via the internet, you do NOT need to return a proxy card or voting instruction form.

Mail

If you received printed copies of the proxy materials by mail, you may vote by mail. Simply mark your proxy card or voting instruction form, date and sign it, and return it in the postage-paid envelope that we included with your materials.

All shares that have been properly voted and not revoked will be voted at the Annual Meeting. If you sign and return a proxy card but do not give voting instructions, the shares represented by that proxy card will be voted as recommended by the Board.

Your vote is very important to us. Please exercisevote your right to vote.shares.

 

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be Held on May 22, 2019ITEMS OF BUSINESS

 

The Company’s Proxy Statement and 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K are available atmaterials.proxyvote.com/344849.

April 12, 2019

Sheilagh M. Clarke

Senior Vice President,

General Counsel and Secretary


 

Proxies are being solicited by the Board of Directors of Foot Locker, Inc. (NYSE: FL) (“Foot Locker,” the “Company,” “we,” “our,” or “us”) to be voted at our 2019 Annual Meeting. As this is a summary of our Proxy Statement, please refer to the complete Proxy Statement for more complete information.

2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

Date and Time:ProposalBoard’s Voting RecommendationPage

May 22, 2019

at 9:00 a.m. EDT

Location:

NYC33, 125 West 33rd Street,
New York, New York 10001

Record Date:

March 25, 2019

 Elect ten membersdirectors to the Board to serve for one-year termsFOReach nominee 1
 Approve, on an advisory basis, our NEOs’ compensationFOR FOR32

 
Ratify the appointmenteach of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2019 fiscal year


FORnominees

69

On or about April 12, 2019, we started mailing a Notice Regarding the Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to our shareholders.

Director Nominees

Ten directors are standing for election at the 2019 Annual Meeting for one-year terms. The table below provides summary information about each of the nominees for director. See pages 6 through 12 for additional information about each nominee and pages 25 through 27 for additional information about the Committees of the Board. 

 

2019 Proxy Statement    

1

Proxy Statement Summary

Board Snapshot

Attendance

Over97%Attendance of Directors
at Board and Committee Meetings in 2018

 

Independence

9out of10directors are independent

 

All directors are independent, except the CEO



Diversity

Our directors represent a range of backgrounds and experience. The majority are women or ethnically diverse. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the “Nominating and Governance Committee”) is focused on ensuring continued diversity on the Board—in terms of gender, age, ethnicity, skills, business experience, service on our Board and the boards of other organizations, and viewpoints—during refreshment activities by requiring that candidate pools include diverse individuals meeting the recruitment criteria.

 



Tenure

 

Directors with varied tenure contribute to a range of perspectives and ensure we transition knowledge and experience from longer-serving members to those newer to our Board. We have a good mix of new and longer-serving directors.

Refreshment

 

3 New Directors Added Over Past Five Years

3 Directors Retired Over Past Five Years

Age

 



2

    Foot Locker, Inc.

Proxy Statement Summary

Environmental, Social, and Governance Highlights

The Company and the Board are focused on corporate social responsibility. We continuously look for new and better ways to foster a diverse and inclusive work environment, engage our surrounding communities, improve employee safety, and minimize our environmental impact, all while creating value for our shareholders. Below are some recent highlights of our diversity and sustainability initiatives.

    
     
     
Item  
Vote, on an advisory basis, to approve the Company’s NEOs’ compensation  FOR 
    
We have several women in senior leadership roles, including the Chief Financial Officer, Chief Human Resources Officer, General Counsel and Secretary, Chief Accounting Officer, Vice President—Global Total Rewards, and Vice President and General Manager, Foot Locker PacificOur independent directors represent a diverse rangeMajority of backgrounds and experience
    Votes Cast by
We strive to have a workforce that reflects the diversity of qualified talent that is available in the markets that we serve
Item   Shareholders
Vote, on an advisory basis, on whether the shareholder vote to approve the Company’s NEOs’ compensation should occur every 1, 2, or 3 years   FOR
1 year
 
     
     
Item    
 Ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2022 fiscal yearRaised and donated over$9 millionfor scholarships since 2004, plus footwear and apparel donations to several organizations U.S. non-store employees permitted paid time-off for volunteering in their communities
FOR 
    
    
     
Global Sourcing Guidelines (GSG) are distributed annually to our suppliers

Transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting and at any adjournment or postponement of the meeting

     

2022PROXY STATEMENT

1

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING

PROXY VOTING

You may vote using any of the following methods:

  

 

TELEPHONE

   If you are located within the United States or Canada, you may vote your shares by calling 800-690-6903 and following the recorded instructions. Telephone voting is available 24 hours per day and will be accessible until 11:59 p.m. EDT on May 17, 2022. The telephone voting system has easy to follow instructions and allows you to confirm that the system has properly recorded your vote. If you vote by telephone, you do NOT need to return a proxy card or VIF.
  
  

 

SCANNING

You may scan the QR Code provided to you to vote your shares through the internet with your mobile device. Internet voting is available 24 hours per day and will be accessible until 11:59 p.m. EDT on May 17, 2022. You will be able to confirm that the system has properly recorded your vote. If you scan your QR code to vote, you do NOT need to return a proxy card or VIF.
  
  

 

AT THE
VIRTUAL
ANNUAL
MEETING

You may vote at the virtual Annual Meeting using the 16-digit control number included on your Notice, proxy card, and VIF that accompanied your proxy materials.
  
 

 

INTERNET

Reduced energy (includingYou may vote your shares through the replacementinternet at proxyvote.com. Internet voting is available 24 hours per day and will be accessible until 11:59 p.m. EDT on May 17, 2022. You will be able to confirm that the system has properly recorded your vote. If you vote through the internet, you do NOT need to return a proxy card or VIF.

 

MAIL

If you received printed copies of all fluorescent fixturesthe proxy materials by mail, you may vote by mail. Simply mark your proxy card or VIF, date and sign it, and return it in the postage-paid envelope that we included with LED lights—which consume 80% less energy than conventional lights—in our stores, warehouses,your materials.

 

APP

You may vote your shares by using the ProxyVote app. Download the app from the App Store or Google Play, scan or enter your control number, and distribution centers)vote. App voting is available 24 hours per day and eliminated wastewill be accessible until 11:59 p.m. EDT on May 17, 2022. You will be able to confirm that the system has properly recorded your vote. If you vote using the app, you do NOT need to return a proxy card or VIF.

 

* U.S. workforce represents 74%

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of global workforce.Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting to be Held on May 18, 2022

The Company’s Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at materials.proxyvote.com/344849.

April 8, 2022

SHEILAGH M. CLARKE

Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

 

2019 Proxy Statement

3

Proxy Statement Summary

Recognition

 

For additional information, seeEnvironmental, Social, and Governance Highlightsbeginning on page 20.

Fiscal 2018 Results

We built positive momentum and improved our financial results in 2018. Highlights include the following:

 

*A reconciliation to GAAP is provided beginning on page 16 of our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

42

    Foot Locker, Inc. 

 

 

DEAR FELLOW SHAREHOLDERS:

Despite the many challenges we confronted and are continuing to experience—including impacts related to the COVID-19 pandemic, supply chain disruption, inflationary pressures, and an evolving geopolitical environment—we delivered record performance in 2021, which reflects the ongoing momentum we have built in our business. I believe the strategic decisions we have made throughout this period have put the Company in a position of strength to confront certain headwinds in the marketplace, including accelerated strategic shifts to DTC by our vendors, and succeed over the long term by creating shareholder value. Let me share with you a few recent highlights:

Merchandise and Vendor Diversification. Our journey to diversify our mix of business and expand our reach as a house of brands is ongoing. We made significant progress diversifying our brands, categories, and channels in 2021. We also expanded our customer base across demographics and high-growth geographies with the acquisitions of WSS and atmos. We made investments in our omni-channel platform to advance our DTC offense and expanded our private label merchandise offerings. We will accelerate these initiatives and others in 2022 as a part of our long-term strategy to strengthen our position at the intersection of youth culture, sports and lifestyle, and the sneaker community.

Investments in Growth. We added two high-growth companies–WSS and atmos–to the Foot Locker, Inc. family in 2021, each with its own differentiated strengths. These strategic acquisitions expand our customer base and geographic reach, strengthen our store footprint, and further diversify our product mix across consumers and price points. WSS, which we expect to double to approximately $1 billion of sales by 2024, gives us a strong off-mall presence in fast-growing markets with a full family offering and a special connection to the Hispanic community. atmos, which we expect to grow by 30% to approximately $300 million of sales over the next three years, provides us with a foothold in Japan and a key launching point into the rest of Asia with a digitally-led business model that combines premium product and creative collaborations to create excitement around the banner.

Climate Stewardship. Management and the Board have established ESG as a priority for the Company. We are committed to helping our planet remain a sustainable home for current and future generations. Unabated climate change presents risks for our business, industry, and society, but through climate stewardship, we may unlock opportunities to innovate and strengthen our relationships with our customers and the communities we serve. We recently announced our ambition to achieve net zero GHG emissions by 2050 or sooner, in alignment with climate scientists’ recommendations to transition toward a net zero state and avoid the worst impacts of climate change. We have also committed to setting a science-based target in line with the criteria established by the Science Based Target initiative (SBTi) and report our progress against certain metrics regarding our GHG emissions annually in our Impact Report, which is available at investors.footlocker-inc.com/impactreport, and is aligned with the reporting disclosure guidance of the SASB industry standards and the TCFD recommendations. This announcement marks an important milestone in our ESG journey. As the Company looks to fiscal 2022 and beyond, we are committed to building on this progress and strengthening our vision for a more sustainable world. To learn more about our efforts to power a more sustainable future, see ESG on page 96, and our Global Environmental and Climate Change Statement, which is available at investors.footlocker-inc.com/climate.

Human Rights. Our human capital is our most important asset. Protecting our team members, our customers, and the communities we serve is one of the most pressing challenges we face. We are proud to create jobs and secure livelihoods for our team members, provide products and engagement for our customers, support community development, and provide tax revenue for governments around the world to invest in the well-being of their

We know that our customer demands choice across a variety of brands and categories, so we continue to work to broaden our selection, including leaning into brands where we are under-penetrated, introducing new brand partners, and developing our own private labels.


people. Specifically, we have policies in place to ensure that we and our partners maintain work environments that respect and support human rights for everyone in our value chain around the world. This is a public good for all stakeholders. For additional information regarding our human rights efforts, see ESG on page 96, our Impact Report, which is available at investors.footlocker-inc.com/impactreport, our Global Human Rights Statement, which is available at investors.footlocker-inc.com/ humanrights, and our Global Sourcing Guidelines, which are available at investors.footlocker-inc.com/gsg.

Organizational Enhancements. In November 2021, we made certain organizational enhancements, including elevating Frank Bracken to the new role of Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. The addition of a Chief Operating Officer creates a more streamlined and agile organizational structure that builds on the success of our geo-focused growth strategy. We believe we will be in a stronger position to address new and emerging opportunities and to grow our connectivity with our consumers and the communities we serve. In March 2022, we recruited Samantha Lomow from outside the Company as our first President, Global Brands, reporting to Frank, to oversee our global brand portfolio and operating divisions across North America, EMEA, and APAC. Also, as part of a planned succession strategy, in April 2021, we recruited Andrew Page from outside the Company as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, succeeding Lauren Peters, who retired from the Company. Each of these organizational enhancements underscores our focus on aligning our team to drive productivity while we continue to pursue our global growth agenda.

Board Refreshment. I want to thank Matt McKenna who will be retiring from the Board at the Annual Meeting after serving for 16 years. Matt’s extensive financial experience has been an invaluable source of insights, and I can say on behalf of the Board and myself that he will be truly missed. I also welcome Gina Drosos who joined our Board in February. Gina is a dynamic and transformative leader with an impressive background and track record. She embodies what we seek from our directors–an agile mindset, proven leadership, and innovative thinking.

 

In addition to this Proxy Statement, I encourage you to review our Annual Report, which is available at investors.footlocker-inc.com/ar.

The Notice and this Proxy Statement each contains details of the business to be conducted at the Annual Meeting. Your vote is very important to us, so please vote your shares.

I am incredibly grateful to our team members, Board, customers, vendor partners, and shareholders.

Thank you for your support of our Company. I ask that you carefully consider the information in this Proxy Statement related to the proposals.

Sincerely,

RICHARD A. JOHNSON

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Learn more about the Board’s highlights from 2021 from our Lead Independent Director on page 28


(GRAPHIC) (GRAPHIC) 

INSPIRE AND EMPOWER YOUTH CULTURE

Foot Locker, Inc. (NYSE: FL) leads the celebration of sneaker and youth culture around the globe through a portfolio of brands, including Foot Locker, Kids Foot Locker, Champs Sports, Eastbay, atmos, WSS, Footaction, and Sidestep, including 2,858 operated stores, as well as websites and mobile apps, in 28 countries across North America, Europe, Asia, Australia, and New Zealand, in addition to 142 franchised stores in the Middle East and Asia.

(GRAPHIC) 

OUR STRATEGIC IMPERATIVES

We have established strategic imperatives for sustained performance centered around our customers:

(GRAPHIC)

2022PROXY STATEMENT

5

ABOUT FOOT LOCKER, INC.

 

GeneralOUR ESG PROGRAM

T

hereManagement and the Board understand that how we achieve our purpose is just as important as what results we achieve. We have long established ESG as a priority for the Company and are continuing to improve the environmental and social impacts of our business, measure the impacts we are making, and communicate with and drive accountability to our stakeholders. Our global ESG program is focused on four pillars:

(GRAPHIC) 

To learn more about our global ESG program, see ESG on page 96, and our Impact Report, which is presented consistent with the SASB reporting standards and TCFD reporting framework and is available at investors.footlocker-inc.com/impactreport.

OUR CLIMATE STEWARDSHIP

(GRAPHIC) 

The Company recently announced its ambition to achieve net zero GHG emissions by 2050 or sooner.

For additional information regarding the Company’s efforts to power a more sustainable future, see ESG on page 96, the Company’s Impact Report, which is aligned with the reporting disclosure guidance of the SASB industry standards and the TCFD recommendations and is available at investors.footlocker-inc.com/impactreport, and the Company’s Global Environmental and Climate Change Statement, which is available at investors.footlocker-inc.com/climate.


6

    Foot Locker, Inc.

ABOUT FOOT LOCKER, INC.

OUR FISCAL 2021 HIGHLIGHTS

Despite the many challenges we confronted and are continuing to experience—including the COVID-19 pandemic, supply chain disruption, inflationary pressures, and an evolving geopolitical environment—we delivered record performance in 2021, which reflects the ongoing momentum we have built in our business. Highlights include the following:

(GRAPHIC) 

(1)A reconciliation to GAAP is provided beginning on page 21 of our Annual Report, which is available at investors.footlocker-inc.com/ar.

EMERGING STRONGER FROM THE 

COVID-19 PANDEMIC

We recognize the human tragedy of the COVID-19 pandemic. Our foremost priority during the pandemic has been the health, safety, and security of our team members, our customers, and the communities we serve. Our approach is grounded in our Company’s purpose.

LEARN MORE ABOUT OUR COMPANY

You can learn more about the Company by visiting footlocker.com/corp. We also encourage you to read our Annual Report, which is available at investors.footlocker-inc.com/ar.

2022PROXY STATEMENT

7

(GRAPHIC) 

(GRAPHIC) 

DEMOGRAPHICS

TENURE

7 years (Median)

Directors with varied tenure contribute to a range of perspectives and ensure we transition knowledge and experience from longer-serving members to those newer to our Board. We have a good mix of new and longer-tenured directors.

AGE

63 years (Median)

DIVERSITY

Our director nominees represent a diverse range of backgrounds—in terms of gender, age, ethnicity, skills, and business and board experience—with an equally diverse range of perspectives. What we share is a common desire to support and oversee management in achieving the Company’s purpose to inspire and empower youth culture.

70% of the director nominees are women or persons of color.

60% of our committees are chaired by women or persons of color.

Our Responsibility Committee is focused on ensuring continued diversity on the Board during refreshment activities by requiring that candidate pools include diverse individuals meeting the relevant recruitment criteria.

SKILLS AND EXPERIENCES

We believe that our slate of director nominees possesses the appropriate mix of diversity in terms of skills, business and Board experience, and viewpoints.

(GRAPHIC) 

8

    Foot Locker, Inc.

VOTING ROADMAP

(GRAPHIC)

PAY-FOR-PERFORMANCE

The centerpiece of our compensation program is our pay-for-performance philosophy that aligns compensation payouts with the achievements of our annual operating plan and long-term strategy, and consequently shareholder value. This is showcased at senior levels of the Company—particularly the CEO—for which most compensation is tied to the Company’s operating and stock performance, as described below.

FactorDescription
Performance-BasedA significant proportion of the CEO’s compensation is performance-based.
Challenging Goals

Recent Annual Incentive Plan and LTI payouts underscore our pay-for-performance culture. For example, only twice in the past five years has the Annual Incentive Plan paid out greater than target and three of the past five PSU awards were not earned and paid out at 0%. 

FormulaicOur Annual Incentive Plan and LTI payouts are formulaically determined based on performance against challenging financial and operating goals. 
Lower Realized PayThe CEO’s five-year realized pay is expected to be lower than his five-year target compensation.
Peer BenchmarkedWe utilize an objective set of criteria to determine peer companies and position CEO pay at the peer group median. 
Reasonable2021 compensation for newly-appointed and outgoing executives was reasonable.

Responsive to  

Say-on-Pay Vote

Our Say-on-Pay support has been strong in recent years.
Compensation MixBeginning with LTI awards granted in 2021, we adopted a consistent mix of PSU awards (60%), stock option awards (20%), and RSU awards (20%). 

Recent Annual Incentive Plan and LTI payouts underscore our pay-for-performance culture:

ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLANPSU AWARDS
(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC)

2022PROXY STATEMENT

9

VOTING ROADMAP

TARGET COMPENSATION VS. REALIZED PAY(1)

Our executives’ realized pay over the past five years further reinforces our pay-for-performance philosophy. Failure to achieve the challenging threshold performance goals set for our Annual Incentive Plan awards and PSU awards results in no payout earned. Also, a decrease in the Company’s stock price results in a decrease in the value of previously-awarded stock option awards—potentially to $0—and no dilution to shareholders, as well as a decrease in the value of previously-awarded RSU awards. When our stock price increases and generates positive returns for our shareholders, the increase impacts an executive’s realized pay during the present fiscal year and for prior fiscal years during which the executive received equity awards that are held or still subject to vesting. Accordingly, a significant portion of our NEOs’ compensation is closely linked to the performance of our stock over time, motivating our executives to generate positive returns for shareholders.

The following chart demonstrates the relationship between the target and realized values of our CEO’s compensation for the past five years:

(GRAPHIC) 

(1)For each year, these amounts reflect the CEO’s base salary paid, Annual Incentive Plan payouts paid, values of PSU awards earned, stock option award tranches vesting during the year, and RSU awards vesting during the year. For 2020, the CEO’s realized pay includes the value of a one-time Accelerate Future Growth award earned.

COMPENSATION MIX

The Human Capital Committee seeks to align the compensation program with both our business strategy and our shareholders’ interests. In order to achieve these objectives, our executive compensation program includes both a mix of annual and long-term, as well as cash and equity, compensation. As shown in the charts below, for 2021, 90% of the CEO’s target compensation mix, and 72%, on average, of the remaining NEOs’ target compensation mix, was performance based.

CEO’s 2021 TARGET COMPENSATIONAVERAGE OF REMAINING NEOs’ 2021
TARGET COMPENSATION
(GRAPHIC) (GRAPHIC)

ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLANLTI PERFORMANCE METRICS
PERFORMANCE METRICS
(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC) 

10

    Foot Locker, Inc.

VOTING ROADMAP

(GRAPHIC) 

On or about April 8, 2022, we started mailing a Notice to our shareholders.

Proxies are being solicited by the Board to be voted at our Annual Meeting.

2022PROXY STATEMENT

11

(GRAPHIC) 

(GRAPHIC) 

2022PROXY STATEMENT

13

This page intentionally left blank.

There are currently 1011 directors on our Board. TheMr. McKenna will be retiring when his term expires at the conclusion of the Annual Meeting, and the Board has fixed the number of directors at 10.10 effective at such time. All current directors other than Mr. McKenna are standing for election for a one-year term at this meeting.

We have refreshed our Board over the past five years, as threefive highly-qualified directors were added to the Board and, threeas of the Annual Meeting, five directors retired.will have retired during that time period. We believe that the Board possesses the appropriate mix of diversity in terms of gender, age, ethnicity, skills, business and Board experience, service on ourand viewpoints.

DIRECTOR NOMINEES

Our Responsibility Committee is charged with recommending director candidates to fill current and anticipated Board vacancies. The Responsibility Committee identifies and evaluates potential candidates from recommendations from the Company’s directors, management, shareholders, and other outside sources, including professional search firms. In evaluating proposed candidates, the Responsibility Committee may review their résumés, obtain references, and conduct personal interviews. The Responsibility Committee considers, among other factors, the Board’s current and future needs for specific skills and the boardscandidate’s experience, leadership qualities, integrity, diversity, ability to exercise judgment, independence, and ability to make the appropriate time commitment to the Board. The Responsibility Committee strives to ensure the Board has a rich mix of relevant skills, diversity, and experiences to address the Company’s needs.

In 2021, the Responsibility Committee conducted a search to identify and recruit an independent director candidate based on specific criteria it previously established, including CEO experience in the specialty retail sector and expertise requirements under the NYSE rules to serve as an audit committee member. The Responsibility Committee reviewed its findings with the Board. In conducting its search, the Responsibility Committee collected names of potential candidates from the Company’s directors and engaged a third-party search firm to identify and recruit qualified candidates. After reviewing the qualifications of the potential pool of candidates and narrowing the field to a few candidates, the Lead Independent Director and Responsibility Committee Chair each interviewed the candidates, the Chairman reviewed the finalists, and the full Board met the finalist. Based on the Responsibility Committee’s review, the candidates’ résumés, and the other organizations,directors’ and viewpoints.Board’s interviews with the candidates, the Responsibility Committee recommended and the Board approved the election of Virginia C. Drosos, who was identified by the third-party search firm.

Nominees

Maxine Clark,Virginia C. Drosos, Alan D. Feldman, Richard A. Johnson, Guillermo G. Marmol, Matthew M. McKenna,Darlene Nicosia, Steven Oakland, Ulice Payne, Jr., Cheryl Nido Turpin, Kimberly Underhill, Tristan Walker, and Dona D. Young will be considered for election as directors to serve for one-year terms expiring at the 20202023 Annual Meeting. Each nominee has been nominated by the Board for election and has consented to serve. If, prior to the 2019 Annual Meeting, any nominee is unable to serve, then the persons designated as proxies for this meeting (Sheilagh(Andrew E. Page, Sheilagh M. Clarke, and John A. Maurer, and Lauren B. Peters)Maurer) will have full discretion to vote for another person to serve as a director in place of that nominee, or the Board may reduce the size of the Board.its size.

Director QualificationsDIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS

The Nominating and GovernanceResponsibility Committee reviewed and updatedevaluated the skills, experience, and qualifications catalogued under the Director Nominees’ Skillset Matrix on pages 23 through 24, and demonstrated by the director skill-set matrixnominees, in light of the Company’s long-term strategic plan and evaluated the directors’ skills, experience, and qualifications under the updated matrix, which is shown beginning on page 11.plan.

The Board, acting through the Nominating and GovernanceResponsibility Committee, considers its members, including those directors being nominated for reelection to the Board at the 2019 Annual Meeting, to be highly qualified for service on the Board due to a variety of factors reflected in each director’s education, areas of expertise, and experience serving on theother organizations’ boards of directors of other organizations during the past five years. Generally, the Board seeks individuals with broad-based experience and the background, judgment, independence, and integrity to represent the shareholders in overseeing the Company’s management in their operation of the business. Within this framework, specific items relevant to the Board’s determination for each director are listed in each director’s biographical information beginning on page 6.18. The ages shown are as of April 12, 2019.8, 2022. There are no family relationships among our directors or executive officers.

 

The Board recommends that shareholders vote2022 FOR the election of each of the ten identified nominees to the Board.

2019 Proxy Statement

515

 

Proposal 1: Election OF Directors DIRECTOR NOMINEES AT A GLANCE Ten directors are standing for election at the Annual Meeting for one-year terms. Matthew M. McKenna will be retiring from the Board when his term expires at the conclusion of the Annual Meeting. The table below provides summary information about each of the nominees for director. See pages 18 through 22 for additional information about each nominee and pages 41 through 42 for additional information about the committees. TENURE 7 Median 3 0-2 years 4 3-8 years 3 >9 years Directors with varied tenure contribute to a range of perspectives and ensure we transition knowledge and experience from longer-serving members to those newer to our Board. We have a good mix of new and longer-tenured directors. AGE 63 Median 4 37-59 5 60-69 1 _70 ATTENDANCE 99% Over 99% aggregate attendance of directors at Board and committee meetings in 2021 Alan D. Feldman F H Independent Retired Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Midas, Inc. Age: 70 Director Since: 2005 Other Public Company Board: John Bean Technologies Corporation Virginia C. Drosos A F Independent Chief Executive Officer of Signet Jewelers Limited Age: 59 Director Since: 2022 Other Public Company Board: Signet Jewelers Limited Darlene Nicosia A H Independent President, Canada and Northeast U.S., North America Operating Unit of The Coca-Cola Company Age: 54 Director Since: 2020 Richard A. Johnson E Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Foot Locker, Inc. Age: 64 Director Since: 2014 Other Public Company Board: H&R Block Inc. Guillermo G. Marmol A E H Independent President of Marmol & Associates Age: 69 Director Since: 2011 16INDEPENDENCE director nominees are independent. All director nominees are independent, except the CEO.

Maxine Clark
(PHOTO) 

Independent Director

Age: 70

Director since: 2013

(GRAPHIC) 
Ms. Clark served as Chief Executive Bear of Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (retail merchants) from her founding the company in 1997 until her retirement in June 2013, and served as its Chairman from April 2000 until November 2011. Following her retirement, Ms. Clark served as a consultant to Build-A-Bear Workshop until January 2014. Ms. Clark is a director of Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. Ms. Clark also serves as Chief Executive Officer of the Clark-Fox Family Foundation, Inspirator of The Delmar DivINe (real estate initiative for community development in St. Louis), Managing Partner of Prosper Women’s Capital, and Executive in Residence of Washington University in St. Louis, John M. Olin School of Business. She serves as chairwoman of the St. Louis Regional Educational and Public Television Commission (KETC/-Channel 9 Public Television) and as a director of each of PBS, the Barnes-Jewish Hospital in St. Louis, the Goldfarb School of Nursing at Barnes-Jewish College, and New America (non-partisan think tank). She was previously a director of Gymboree Corp. from November 2014 to September 2017 and a trustee of the International Council of Shopping Centers.Ms. Clark has extensive experience in both domestic and international retailing, including founding and leading Build-A-Bear Workshop, serving as President of Payless ShoeSource, Inc., and serving for 19 years as an executive of The May Department Stores Company. She adds significant experience to our Board in strategic planning, real estate, digital technology, and marketing. Her retail and business background, as well as her financial expertise, are particularly useful for her service as a member of the Finance and Strategic Planning Committee (the “Finance Committee”).

Alan D. Feldman
(PHOTO) 

Independent Director

Age: 67

Director since: 2005

(GRAPHIC) 
Mr. Feldman served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Midas, Inc. (automotive repair and maintenance services) from May 2006 to April 2012, and as President and Chief Executive Officer of Midas, Inc. from January 2003 to April 2006. He was an independent consultant from March 2002 to January 2003. Mr. Feldman previously served as an executive at PepsiCo, Inc., Pizza Hut, Inc., and McDonald’s Corporation. Mr. Feldman is a director of John Bean Technologies Corporation and GNC Holdings, Inc., the Chair of the Foundation Board of the University of Illinois, and a member of the Governing Council of Good Samaritan Hospital. He was a director of Midas, Inc. from January 2003 to April 2012.Mr. Feldman is a recognized business leader with a broad base of experience in franchised retail operations, brand management, and customer relations. He previously served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Midas, Inc. and currently serves on the boards of two other public companies, John Bean Technologies Corporation and GNC Holdings, Inc. Mr. Feldman’s leadership skills, retail knowledge, financial expertise, and executive experience provide particularly useful background for his service as a member of the Finance Committee and the Compensation and Management Resources Committee (the “Compensation Committee”).

 (GRAPHIC)

6

    Foot Locker, Inc.

Proposal 1: Election OF Directors COMMITTEES A Audit E Executive F Finance H Human Capital R Responsibility Committee Chair DIVERSITY Our director nominees represent a diverse range of backgrounds—in terms of gender, age, ethnicity, skills, and business and board experience—with an equally diverse range of perspectives. What we share is a common desire to support management in achieving the Company’s purpose to inspire and empower youth culture. 70% of the director nominees are women or persons of color 60% of committees are chaired by women or persons of color Hispanic/ Latinx African American/ Black Women 0 6 2 4 Our Responsibility Committee is focused on ensuring continued diversity on the Board during refreshment activities by requiring that candidate pools include diverse individuals meeting the recruitment criteria. Kimberly Underhill E H R Independent Senior Advisor of Boston Consulting Group Age: 57 Director Since: 2016 Tristan Walker F R Independent Founder and Chief Executive Officer of Walker & Company Brands Inc. Managing Member of Heirloom Management Company, LLC Age: 37 Director Since: 2020 Other Public Company Board: Shake Shack Inc. Ulice Payne, Jr. A E R Independent President of Cyber-Athletix, LLC President and Managing Member of Addison-Clifton, LLC Age: 66 Director Since: 2016 Other Public Company Boards: ManpowerGroup Inc. WEC Energy Group, Inc. REFRESHMENT Over past years new directors added and, as of 2022 Annual Meeting, directors will have retired Foot Locker, Inc. Policy: Retirement Age 72 Steven Oakland E F R Independent Chief Executive Officer and President of TreeHouse Foods, Inc. Age: 61 Director Since: 2014 Other Public Company Board: TreeHouse Foods, Inc. Dona D. Young A E R Lead Independent Director Independent executive and board consultant Retired Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of The Phoenix Companies, Inc. Age: 68 Director Since: 2001 Other Public Company Board: Aegon N.V. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT 17

 

 

 

ProposalPROPOSAL 1: Election of DirectorsELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

RichardRICHARD A. JohnsonJOHNSON
 
(PHOTO) 

Chairman President and

Chief Executive officerOfficer

Age: 64

Director since: 2014

Age: 61

Director since: 2014

(GRAPHIC) 

  

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

Foot Locker, Inc. 

Mr. Johnson has served as the Company’s Chairman of the BoardChairman, since May 2016 and

President and Chief Executive Officer, since December 2014. Mr. Johnson served as Executive Vice President2014

OTHER BOARD SERVICE

Director and Chief Operating Officer from May 2012 to November 2014. He served as Executive Vice Presidentmember of the Audit and Group President-Retail Stores from July 2011 to May 2012; President and Chief Executive Officer of Foot Locker U.S., Lady Foot Locker, Kids Foot Locker, and Footaction from January 2010 to June 2011; President and Chief Executive Officer of Foot Locker Europe from August 2007 to January 2010; and President and Chief Executive Officer of Footlocker.com/Eastbay from April 2003 to August 2007. Mr. Johnson has been a director ofCompensation committees, H&R Block, Inc., since September 2015 and was previously a director of

Director, Maidenform Brands, Inc. from, January 2013 to October 2013.2013

Mr. Johnson has extensive experience as a retail company executive, including 22 years at the Company. He serves as our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Johnson has led almost all of the Company’s major businesses in the United States, International, and Direct-to-Customer and has extensive knowledge of all facets of the Company’s business. He has played an integral role in developing and executing the Company’s strategic plans. He also has experience serving as a director of a public company through his current service as a director of H&R Block Inc. (including on the audit and compensation committees) and past service at Maidenform Brands, Inc. Mr. Johnson is also a director of the Retail Industry Leaders Association (RILA) and the Footwear Distributors and Retailers of America (FDRA) and serves on theRILA

Director, FDRA

Member, University of Wisconsin—Eau Claire National Leadership Council.Council

REASONS FOR NOMINATION

Mr. Johnson has extensive experience as a retail company chief executive, including 25 years at the Company. He has led almost all of the Company’s major businesses in the United States, International, and Direct-to-Customer, has extensive knowledge of all facets of the Company’s business, and played an integral role in developing and executing the Company’s strategic plans.

 

Guillermo G. MarmolCOMMITTEERELEVANT SKILLS
DONA D. YOUNG
 
(PHOTO) 

Lead Independent Director

Age: 68

Director since: Age:2001 66

Director since: 2011

(GRAPHIC) 

  
Mr. Marmol has served as President of Marmol & Associates (consulting firm that provides advisory services and investment capital to early stage technology companies) since March 2007 and, prior to that, from October 2000 to May 2003. He served as Division Vice President and a member of the Executive Committee of Electronic Data Systems Corporation (global technology services company) from June 2003 to February 2007, and as a director and Chief Executive Officer of Luminant Worldwide Corporation (internet professional services company) from July 1998 to September 2000. He served as Vice President and Chair of the Operating Committee of Perot Systems Corporation (information technology and business solutions company) from December 1995 to June 1998. He began his career at McKinsey & Company (management consulting firm) from 1990 to 1995, rising to Senior Partner, and was a leader of the organization and business process redesign practices. Mr. Marmol is a director of Vitamin Shoppe, Inc. and Morae Global Corporation, and he is a member of the Board of Trustees and Chair of the Finance Committee of the Center for a Free Cuba. Mr. Marmol was a director of Information Services Group, Inc. from 2012 to 2013, KERA/KXT North Texas Public Broadcasting Inc. from 2015 to 2017, and Principal Solar Inc.Mr. Marmol has a significant background in information technology and systems, which continues to be highly important to the Company as we enhance our technology and systems and build a more powerful digital business to connect with our customers. He also serves as a director and Chair of the Nomination and Governance Committee of another public company, Vitamin Shoppe, Inc. Through his long tenure as a management consultant focusing on strategic analysis and business processes, he brings valuable knowledge and expertise to his service on the Board, as Chair of the Audit Committee and as a member on the Finance Committee.

 

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

 (GRAPHIC)

 

Independent executive and board consultant

The Phoenix Companies, Inc. (insurance and asset management company)

 

2019 Proxy Statement    

7

Proposal 1: Election of Directors

Matthew M. McKenna
(PHOTO) 

Independent Director

Age: 68

Director since: 2006

(GRAPHIC) 
Mr. McKenna has served as Executive in Residence of Georgetown University’s McDonough School of Business since February 2017 and General Partner of the Open Prairie Rural Opportunities Fund, L.P. (private equity fund) since April 2018. He served as Senior Advisor to the U.S. Secretary of Agriculture from July 2013 to January 2017;Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, of Keep America Beautiful, Inc. (non-profit community improvement and educational organization) from January 2008April 2003 to June 2013; and Senior Vice President of Finance of PepsiCo, Inc. (global snack and beverage company) from August 2001 to December 2007. Mr. McKenna serves on the board of Green Dot Bioplastics LLC (bioscience social enterprise and full-service bioplastics company), and MTC Productions, Inc., a non-profit affiliateApril 2009

OTHER BOARD SERVICE

Chairman of the Manhattan Theater Club. He is also an adjunct professor at Fordham University School of Law. Mr. McKenna was a director of PepsiAmericas, Inc. from 2001 to 2010.Mr. McKenna has extensive financial, tax, and legal expertise, having served as a partner at an international law firm in New York City, a senior financial officer of PepsiCo, Inc., and a general partner of a private equity fund, which is useful for his service as Chair of the FinanceSupervisory Board Risk Committee and as a member of the Supervisory Board Nomination and Governance Committee, Aegon N.V. (insurance, pension, and asset management company)

Vice Chair of Audit Committee. The Board has determined that Mr. McKenna qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined by the rules under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). In addition, Mr. McKenna has government experience based on his experience as Senior Advisor to the U.S. Secretary of Agriculture. He also brings the perspectiveCommittee and member of the non-profit sector from his previous positions as PresidentNominating and Chief Executive Officer of Keep America Beautiful, Inc.Governance, and Chairman of Ignatian Volunteer Corps., as well as his current positions as Executive in Residence of Georgetown UniversityCompensation and adjunct professor at Fordham University.Workforce committees, USAA (United Services Automobile Association)

Steven Oakland
(PHOTO) 

Independent Director,

Age: 58

Director since: 2014

(GRAPHIC) 
Mr. Oakland has served as Chief Executive Officer and President of TreeHouse Foods, Inc. (manufacturer of packaged foods and beverages) since March 2018. He previously served as Vice Chair and President, U.S. Food and Beverage of The J.M. Smucker Company (“Smucker’s”) (manufacturer of packaged foods and beverages) from May 2016 to March 2018; President, Coffee and Foodservice of Smucker’s from April 2015 to April 2016; President, International Food Service of Smucker’s from May 2011 to March 2015; and President, U.S. Retail-Smucker’s Jif, and Hungry Jack from August 2008 to May 2011. He also serves on the board of MTD Products, Inc., a privately-held manufacturing company, and Foster Farms, a privately-held poultry business.Mr. Oakland brings to our Board a broad-based business background and extensive experience in domestic and international consumer products operations, with particular strength in customer engagement, marketing, brand-building, and strategic planning. Additionally, Mr. Oakland is actively involved in management resources issues and governance matters as the chief executive of a public company, providing him with relevant expertise as a member of the Compensation Committee, and Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee. Mr. Oakland also has risk management, business development,Committee, NACD

Board Member, Spahn & Rose Lumber Co.

Director and mergersmember of the Audit and acquisitions experience.Governance committees, Save the Children Association and Save the Children International (non-profit organizations)

Director and member of the Audit Committee, Save the Children U.S.

Trustee, Saint James School in Saint James, Maryland

 

REASONS FOR NOMINATION

Ms. Young has significant governance, legal, mergers and acquisitions, risk management, and financial experience given her prior service as a public company General Counsel, and later CEO, which are relevant in her role as Lead Independent Director. The education and experience Ms. Young acquired through her board service at Save the Children are useful in her oversight of the Company’s human rights efforts. In addition, she was named by the Financial Times’ Outstanding Directors Exchange as a member of its Outstanding Directors class of 2021, the NACD Directorship 100 for 2015, and a NACD Board Leadership Fellow since 2013. She is NACD Directorship Certified™, completed the NACD Cyber-Risk Oversight Program, earned a CERT Certificate in Cybersecurity Oversight conferred by Carnegie Mellon University, and was a 2012 Advanced Leadership Fellow at Harvard University.

COMMITTEESRELEVANT SKILLS
A  E  R

 

18

    Foot Locker, Inc.

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

VIRGINIA C. DROSOS
 
 (GRAPHIC)Independent Director
Age: 59

Director since: 2022

 

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

Signet Jewelers Limited (specialty jewelry retailer)

Chief Executive Officer, since August 2017

Assurex Health, Inc. (personalized medicine company)

President and Chief Executive Officer, August 2013 to July 2017

OTHER BOARD SERVICE

Director, Signet Jewelers Limited, since 2012

Director, Akron Children’s Hospital, since April 2019

Director, American Financial Group, Inc., 2013 to December 2021

Director, Assurex Health, Inc., August 2013 to July 2017

REASONS FOR NOMINATION

Ms. Drosos brings valuable skills and insights to the Board, including proven expertise in strategy, branding, marketing, digital commerce, and global operations. She has proven retail expertise in mergers and acquisitions and business expansions into new product lines, retail channels, and geographies. Ms. Drosos is the sitting CEO of a specialty retailer, she is a visionary and transformational leader with an entrepreneurial mindset, and she has a proven track record of growing and scaling global businesses through deep consumer understanding, product and experience innovation, and heightened employee engagement. Further, Ms. Drosos is actively involved in financial planning issues as the CEO of a public company, providing her with relevant expertise as a member of the Audit Committee and Finance Committee.

COMMITTEESRELEVANT SKILLS
A  F
ALAN D. FELDMAN
Independent Director
Age: 70

8Director since: 2005

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

Midas, Inc. (automotive repair and maintenance service provider)

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, May 2006 to April 2012

President and Chief Executive Officer, January 2003 to April 2006

OTHER BOARD SERVICE

Director, John Bean Technologies Corporation, since July 2008

Director, GNC Holdings, Inc., June 2013 to June 2020

Director, Foundation Board, University of Illinois Foundation, since September 2012

REASONS FOR NOMINATION

Mr. Feldman has extensive chief executive, financial, and franchised retail experience as the former CEO of a public company specializing in retail franchises, providing him with relevant expertise as a member of the Human Capital Committee and Finance Committee.

COMMITTEESRELEVANT SKILLS
F  H

2022 PROXY STATEMENT

19

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

GUILLERMO G. MARMOL
Independent Director
Age: 69

Director since: 2011

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

Marmol & Associates (consulting firm that provides advisory services and investment capital to early-stage technology companies)

President, since March 2007 and October 2000 to May 2003

OTHER BOARD SERVICE

Non-executive Chief Executive Officer, Viron Therapeutics Holdings Inc., since 2021

Director and Audit Committee member, Morae Global Corporation, until August 2021

Director, Vitamin Shoppe, Inc., February 2016 to December 2019

Chair of the Board of Trustees, Center for a Free Cuba

REASONS FOR NOMINATION

Mr. Marmol has a significant background in information technology and systems, which is highly important to the Company as we continue to invest in our technology and systems and build a more powerful digital business to connect with our customers. Mr. Marmol also has extensive executive, financial, strategic analysis, and business process experience as a management consultant at Marmol & Associates and McKinsey & Company and a former senior executive officer of Luminant Worldwide Corporation, Electronic Data Systems Corporation, and Perot Systems Corporation, providing him with relevant expertise as a member of the Human Capital Committee and Audit Committee Chair.

COMMITTEESRELEVANT SKILLS

 

DARLENE NICOSIA
Independent Director
Age: 54

Director since: 2020

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

The Coca-Cola Company (beverage company)

President, Canada and Northeast U.S., North America Operating Unit, since January 2021

President of the Canada Business Unit, January 2019 to January 2021

Vice President, Commercial Product Supply, May 2016 to January 2019

OTHER BOARD SERVICE

Advisory Board Member, Georgia Institute of Technology, Scheller College of Business

Chair of the Board, Canadian Beverage Association

Member, Food, Health, and Consumer Products of Canada Association

REASONS FOR NOMINATION

Ms. Nicosia brings to our Board a broad-based global business background, particularly brand-building and global supply chain management, gained through her experience in the consumer products industry. Throughout her career, Ms. Nicosia has led sustainability initiatives and navigated complex regulatory environments and shifting consumer preferences. Her extensive understanding of supply chain, marketing operations, third-party risk management, and business transformation is an asset to our Board, particularly our Audit Committee and Human Capital Committee.

COMMITTEESRELEVANT SKILLS
A  H

20

    Foot Locker, Inc. 

 

 

 

 

ProposalPROPOSAL 1: Election of DirectorsELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Ulice Payne, Jr.STEVEN OAKLAND
 
 (PHOTO)

Independent Director

Age: 61

Director since: Age:2014 63

Director since: 2016

(GRAPHIC) 

  

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

TreeHouse Foods, Inc. (manufacturer of packaged foods and beverages)

Chief Executive Officer and President, since March 2018

The J.M. Smucker Company (manufacturer of packaged foods and beverages)

Vice Chair and President, U.S. Food and Beverage, May 2016 to March 2018

President, Coffee and Foodservice, April 2015 to April 2016

OTHER BOARD SERVICE

Director, TreeHouse Foods, Inc.

Director and member of Compensation committee, Foster Farms

Director, Food Industry Association

Director, MTD Products, Inc., until December 2021

REASONS FOR NOMINATION

Mr. Oakland brings to our Board a broad-based business background and extensive experience in domestic and international consumer products operations, with particular strengths around business development, mergers and acquisitions, risk management, strategic planning, customer engagement, marketing, and brand building. Mr. Oakland is actively involved in governance and financial matters as the sitting CEO of a public company, providing him with relevant expertise as a member of the Responsibility Committee and Finance Committee Chair.

COMMITTEESRELEVANT SKILLS

 

ULICE PAYNE, JR.
 
Mr. Payne has served as Independent Director
Age: 66

Director since: 2016

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

Cyber-Athletix, LLC (esports healthcare company)

President, since March 2021

Addison-Clifton, LLC (global trade compliance advisory services provider)

President and Managing Member, of Addison-Clifton, LLC (global trade compliance advisory services provider) since May 2004. He previously served as President2004

OTHER BOARD SERVICE

Director and Chief Executive Officermember of the Milwaukee Brewers Baseball Club from September 2002 to December 2003; Managing Partner, from 2001 to 2002,Audit and Partner, from February 1998 to September 2002,Governance and Sustainability committees, ManpowerGroup, Inc.

Director and member of Foley & Lardner, LLP, a Milwaukee-based law firm;the Finance Committee and the Wisconsin Commissioner of Securities from February 1985 to December 1987. Mr. Payne presently serves as a director of ManpowerGroup Inc., andCompensation Committee Chair, WEC Energy Group, Inc. He previously served as a director

Director, Wisconsin Conservatory of Badger Meter, Inc. from 2000 to 2010,Music

Director, The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, fromJanuary 2005 to May 2018 Midwest Air Group, Inc. from 1998 to 2007, and The Marcus Corporation from 1996 to 2000.Mr. Payne brings to our Board significant managerial, operational, financial, public service, and global experience as a result of the many senior positions he has held, including as President and Managing Member of Addison-Clifton, LLC, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Milwaukee Brewers Baseball Club, Managing Partner of Foley & Lardner, LLP, and the Wisconsin Commissioner of Securities. He also serves as a director of two other public companies, ManpowerGroup Inc., and WEC Energy Group, Inc. As Foot Locker is a global company, the Board also benefits from his broad experience in, and knowledge of, international business and global trade compliance. In addition, Mr. Payne’s past and present experience on the boards of several public corporations includes service as a member of either the audit or finance committee at each of these companies, which is beneficial to the Board.

REASONS FOR NOMINATION

Mr. Payne brings to our Board significant governance, operational, financial, public service, trade compliance, and international experience as a result of the many senior positions he has held, including as President and Managing Member of Addison-Clifton, LLC since May 2004, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Milwaukee Brewers Baseball Club from September 2002 to December 2003, Managing Partner of Foley & Lardner, LLP from 2001 to 2002, Partner of Foley & Lardner, LLP from February 1998 to September 2002, and the Wisconsin Commissioner of Securities from February 1985 to December 1987. Mr. Payne’s extensive experience provides him with relevant expertise as a member of the Audit Committee and Responsibility Committee Chair.

 

Cheryl Nido TurpinCOMMITTEESRELEVANT SKILLS
(PHOTO) 

Independent Director

Age: 71

Director since: 2011

(GRAPHIC) 
Ms. Turpin served as President and Chief Executive Officer of The Limited Stores (retail merchants), a division of Limited Brands, Inc., from June 1994 to August 1997. Prior to that, she served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Lane Bryant, a subsidiary of The Limited Stores, Inc., from January 1990 to June 1994. Ms. Turpin served as a director of The Warnaco Group, Inc. from 2004 to February 2013, and as a director of Stage Stores, Inc. from 2010 to 2011.Ms. Turpin brings to our Board long experience as a retail executive, most recently as President and Chief Executive Officer of The Limited Stores, where she worked in a multi-divisional retail structure similar to our Company. She previously served as a director of two other public companies, The Warnaco Group, Inc. and Stage Stores, Inc., and she served as chair of the compensation committees of those companies. Her retail and brand marketing background strongly complements the expertise of the Board, and her past service as chair of the compensation committees of other public retail companies provides particularly useful background for her service on our Compensation Committee.

 (GRAPHIC)

 

 2019 Proxy Statement    2022 PROXY STATEMENT

921

 

 

ProposalPROPOSAL 1: Election of DirectorsELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Kimberly UnderhillKIMBERLY UNDERHILL
 
 (PHOTO)

Independent Director

Age: 57

Director since: Age:2016 54

Director since: 2016

(GRAPHIC) 

  

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

Boston Consulting Group (management consulting firm)

Senior Advisor, since November 2021

Kimberly-Clark Corporation (manufacturer of branded personal care, consumer tissue, and professional healthcare products)

Ms. Underhill has served as President, North America Consumer, of Kimberly-Clark Corporation (global manufacturer of branded personal care, consumer tissue, and professional healthcare products) since May 2018. She previously served in other senior leadership positions with Kimberly-Clark, including 2018 to September 2021

Global President of Kimberly-Clark Professional, from April 2014 to May 2018; President, Consumer Europe from August 2011 to April 2014; Vice President Country Manager, UK and Ireland from September 2009 to August 2011; and President, North America Group Products, Family Care from October 2006 to August 2009. She is also a2018

OTHER BOARD SERVICE

Advisory board member, of theRawhide Youth Services

Director, Board of Directors of theTrustees, ThedaCare

Co-Chair and Leadership Giving Chair, United Way Fox Cities Campaign

Director and Compensation Committee Chair, Network of Executive Women, (women’s leadership organization serving retail and consumer goods industries).Ms. Underhill brings to our Board a broad-based business background and extensive experience in domestic and international consumer products operations, with particular strength in marketing, brand-building, strategic planning, and international business development. Additionally, Ms. Underhill is actively involved in management resources issues as a senior executive of a public company, which provides relevant expertise to both our Compensation Committee, of which she is Chair, and Finance Committee, of which she is a member. Through her senior executive position at Kimberly-Clark, Ms. Underhill also has significant international and business development experience.until 2021

Director, Kimberly-Clark de Mexico, S.A.B. de C.V., until September 2021

Director, Food Industry Association, until 2021

REASONS FOR NOMINATION

Ms. Underhill brings to our Board a broad-based business background and extensive experience in domestic and international consumer products operations, with particular strengths in marketing, brand building, strategic planning, international business, and business development. She is NACD Directorship CertifiedTM. Ms. Underhill’s management resources experience from her prior service as a senior executive of a public company is relevant to both our Human Capital Committee, of which she is Chair, and Responsibility Committee, of which she is a member.

 

Dona D. YoungCOMMITTEESRELEVANT SKILLS

 

TRISTAN WALKER
 
(PHOTO) Independent Director
Age: 37

Independent Lead Director since: 2020

Age: 65

Director since: 2001

(GRAPHIC) 

  

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

Walker & Company Brands Inc. (manufacturer of health and beauty products for persons of color), a subsidiary of the Procter & Gamble Company

Mrs. Young retired in April 2009 as Chairman, PresidentFounder and Chief Executive Officer, of The Phoenix Companies, Inc. (at the time an insurance and asset management company) after a nearly 30-year career. She currently engages in independent strategic advising and consulting, with a focus on corporate social responsibility and board governance issues, and CEO coaching and counseling. She is a member of the Supervisory Board of Aegon N.V. (multinational life insurance, pension, and asset management company), a director of the National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD), a trustee of the Saint James School in Saint James, Maryland, and a director and Audit Committee Chair of Save the Children US, and a director of Save the Children International and Save the Children Association (each a non-profit organization). She has previously served as a director of The Phoenix Companies, Inc., Wachovia Corporation, Sonoco Products Company, and Wittenberg University in Springfield, Ohio.Mrs. Young brings significant financial, governance, and legal experience to our Board. Her prior service as General Counsel, and later Chief Executive Officer, of Phoenix has exposed her to a number of areas, including financial reporting, leadership and talent development, and risk management. She also has extensive transactional experience, including mergers and acquisitions, divestitures, spin-offs, and restructurings. Mrs. Young’s leadership skills and broad corporate governance experience concerning board succession planning, board composition, and executive leadership, are useful for her service as Lead Director and a member of both the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Audit Committee. Mrs. Young serves as a member of the Supervisory Board, Chair of the Risk Committee, and a member of the Nominating and Governance Committee and Audit Committee of Aegon N.V. Mrs. Young is a director of the NACD, a faculty member of the NACD Board Advisory Services, was named to the NACD Directorship 100 for 2015, and has been an NACD Board Leadership Fellow since 2013. She was a 2012 Advanced Leadership Fellow at Harvard University. Mrs. Young completed the NACD Cyber-Risk Oversight Program and earned a CERT Certificate in Cybersecurity Oversight conferred by Carnegie Mellon University.April 2013

 

Heirloom Management Company, LLC (micro venture capital fund)

 (GRAPHIC)Managing Member, since March 2022

 

OTHER BOARD SERVICE

Director, Shake Shack, Inc.

Trustee, Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta

Chairman, CODE2040 (non-profit organization that matches high-performing Black and Latino software engineering students and graduates with technology firms and start-ups), until January 2020

REASONS FOR NOMINATION

Mr. Walker’s brand marketing and technology experience are deeply connected to the mission of designing solutions for consumers while bridging the gap between technology product innovation and youth culture. Mr. Walker understands how to utilize innovation and technology to drive change and deliver growth. His work at the intersection of technology and the consumer experience benefits our Board, and his financial and ESG experience as a CEO provides him with relevant expertise as a member of the Finance Committee and Responsibility Committee.

COMMITTEESRELEVANT SKILLS
F  R

1022

    Foot Locker, Inc. 

 

 

 

ProposalPROPOSAL 1: Election of DirectorsELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

Summary of Director Qualifications and Experience and Demographic MatrixDIRECTOR NOMINEES’ SKILLSET MATRIX

 

We believe that our slate ofthe director nominees possessespossess the appropriate mix of diversity in terms of gender, age, ethnicity, skills, business experience, service on ourand Board and the boards of other organizations,experience, and viewpoints. We have refreshed our Board over the past five years, as threefive highly-qualified directors were added to the Board and, threeas of the Annual Meeting, five directors retired. will have retired during that time period.

 (GRAPHIC)

2022PROXY STATEMENT

23

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Each director is individually qualified to make unique and substantial contributions. Collectively, our directors’ diverse viewpoints and independent-mindedness enhance the quality and effectiveness of Board deliberations and decision making. This blend of qualifications, attributes, and tenure results in highly effective leadership and is summarized below.highly-effective oversight.

 

(GRAPHIC) 

Knowledge, Skills, and Experience24

ClarkFeldmanJohnsonMarmolMcKennaOaklandPayneTurpinUnderhillYoung
Leadership

    
(LOGO) Chief Executiveexperience is important because directors who have served as CEOs of public or substantial privately-held or non-profit companies have experience working, communicating, and engaging with a variety of important stakeholder groups, including shareholders, bondholders, and investment analysts
Strategy
(LOGO)Broad-Based Businessexpertise provides a depth of experience to leverage in evaluating issues, and making business judgments
(LOGO)Digital and Channel Connectivityexperience is important to the Company as we build a more powerful digital experience for our customers
(LOGO)Public Serviceexperience is relevant to the Company as it is affected by government actions
(LOGO) Information Securityexperience is relevant given the importance of protecting both the Company’s and our customers’ information
(LOGO)Internationalexperience is important in understanding and reviewing our business and strategy outside of the United States, particularly in Europe and Asia
(LOGO)Retail, Brand Marketing, and Social Mediaexperience gives directors an understanding of assessing, developing, and implementing our marketing and customer engagement strategies
(LOGO)Strategic Investmentsexperience is important in evaluating our financial statements and investment strategy
(LOGO) Strategic Planning and Analysisexperience provides a practical understanding of assessing, developing, and implementing the metrics of our long-term financial objectives and strategic priorities
(LOGO)Supply Chainexperience is important to understand the omnichannel commerce distribution model with multiple fulfilment points to serve the customer
Foot Locker, Inc. 

 

2019 Proxy Statement

11

 

 

 

Proposal 1: Election of Directors

Knowledge, Skills, and ExperienceClarkFeldmanJohnsonMarmolMcKennaOaklandPayneTurpinUnderhillYoung
            
(LOGO)Technology and Systemsexperience is important given the importance of technology to the retail marketplace, our internal operations, and our customer engagement initiatives          
            
            
(LOGO)Youth Culture/Target Marketexperience is important to understand our business and strategy as our brands keenly focus on their target customers, particularly youth culture          
            
Governance          
            
Accounting or Financialexpertise gained from experience as a CEO, audit professional, or finance executive is important because it assists our directors in understanding and overseeing our financial reporting and internal controls          
            
            
(LOGO)Business Development / Mergers and Acquisitionsexperience is important because it helps in assessing potential growth opportunities          
            
            
(LOGO)Environmental, Social, and Governanceexperience is important because it supports our goals of strong Board and management accountability, transparency, and protection of shareholder interests          
            
            
(LOGO)Risk Managementexperience is helpful to the Board’s role in overseeing the risks facing the Company          
            
Demographic Background          
            
Board Tenure (Year Joined)2013200520142011200620142016200120162001
Years61458135318318
Gender          
Male          
Female          
Age (at April 12, 2019)          
Years old70676166685863715465
Race/Ethnicity          
African American          
Hispanic         
White           
Number of Other Public Company Boards1211121

12

Foot Locker, Inc.

(GRAPHIC)  (GRAPHIC)

 

The Board is committed to good corporate governance and has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines and other policies and practices to guide the Board and senior management.OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

Our Board of Directors

(GRAPHIC)

Our By-Laws provide for a Board consisting of between 7 and 13 directors. The exact number of directors is determined from time to time by the entire Board. TheThere are currently 11 directors on our Board. Mr. McKenna will be retiring when his term expires at the conclusion of the Annual Meeting, and the Board has fixed the number of directors at 10 and there are currently 10 directors on our Board.effective at such time.

 

Directors’ IndependenceDIRECTORS’ INDEPENDENCE

 

A director is not considered independent under New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”)NYSE rules if he or she hasthey have a material relationship with the Company that would impair his or hertheir independence. In addition to the independence criteria established by the NYSE, the Board has adopted categorical standards to assist it in making its independence determinations regarding individual directors. These categorical standards are contained in the Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are posted on the Company’s corporate websiteavailable atfootlocker.com/corpinvestors.footlocker-inc.com/cgg.

 

The Board has determined that the following categories of relationships are immaterial for purposes of determining whether a director is independent under the NYSE listing standards:

 

Categorical RelationshipDescription
Investment Relationships with the CompanyA director and any family member may own equities or other securities of the Company.
Relationships with Other Business EntitiesA director and any family member may be a director, employee (other than an executive officer), or beneficial owner of less than 10% of the shares of a business entity with which the Company does business, provided that the aggregate amount involved in a fiscal year does not exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of either that entity’s or the Company’s annual consolidated gross revenue.
Relationships with Not-for-Profit EntitiesA director and any family member may be a director or employee (other than an executive officer or the equivalent) of a not-for-profit organization to which the Company (including the Foot Locker Foundation) makes contributions, provided that the aggregate amount of the Company’s contributions in any fiscal year do not exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of the not-for-profit entity’s total annual receipts.

 

We individually inquire of each of our directors and executive officers about any transactions in which the Company and any of these related persons or their immediate family members are participants. We also make inquiries within the Company’s records for information on any of these kinds of transactions. Once we gather the information, we then review all relationships and transactions of which we are aware in which the Company and any of our directors, executive officers, their immediate family members, or five-percent5% shareholders are participants to determine, based on the facts and circumstances, whether the related persons have a direct or indirect material interest. TheOur General Counsel’s office coordinates the related person transaction review process. The Nominating and GovernanceResponsibility Committee reviews any reported transactions involving directors and their immediate family members in making its recommendation to the Board on the independence of the directors. In approving, ratifying, or rejecting a related person transaction, the Nominating and GovernanceResponsibility Committee considers such

2019 Proxy Statement    

13

Corporate Governance

information as it deems important to determine whether the transaction is on reasonable and competitive terms and is fair to the Company. The Company’s written policies and procedures for related person transactions are included within both the Corporate Governance Guidelines and the Code of Business Conduct. There were no related person transactions in 2018.2021.

2022PROXY STATEMENT

25

GOVERNANCE

 

The Board, upon the recommendation of the Nominating and GovernanceResponsibility Committee, has determined that the following directors are independent under the NYSE rules because they have no material relationship with the Company that would impair their independence:

 

(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC) (GRAPHIC) (GRAPHIC) (GRAPHIC) 

DONA D. 

YOUNG

Age: 68

Director since: 2001

Lead Independent

Director

VIRGINIA C. 

DROSOS

Age: 59

Director since: 2022

ALAN D. 

FELDMAN

Age: 70

Director since: 2005

GUILLERMO G. 

MARMOL

Age: 69

Director since: 2011

MATTHEW M. 

MCKENNA

Age: 71

Director since: 2006

 

(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC) (GRAPHIC) (GRAPHIC) (GRAPHIC)

DARLENE 

NICOSIA

Age: 54

Director since: 2020

STEVEN 

OAKLAND

Age: 61

Director since: 2014

ULICE 

PAYNE, JR.

Age: 66

Director since: 2016

KIMBERLY 

UNDERHILL

Age: 57

Director since: 2016

TRISTAN 

WALKER

Age: 37

Director since: 2020

 

Jarobin Gilbert, Jr. served as a director of the Company during 2018 until his retirement from the Board in May 2018. The Board determined that Mr. Gilbert was independent under NYSE rules through the end of his term as a director because he had no material relationship with the Company that would impair his independence.

In making its independence determination, the Board reviewed recommendations of the Nominating and Governance Committee and considered Dona D. Young and Ulice Payne, Jr.’s

(GRAPHIC) 

directors are independent. All

directors are independent,

except the CEO.

Maxine Clark served as a director of the Company during 2021 until her retirement from the Board in May 2021. The Board determined that Ms. Clark was independent under NYSE rules through the end of her term as a director because she had no material relationship with the Company that would impair her independence.

In making its independence determination, the Board reviewed recommendations of the Responsibility Committee and considered Mr. Payne and Ms. Young’s relationships as directors of companies with which we do business. The Board has determined that these relationships meet the categorical standard for Relationships with Other Business Entities and are immaterial with respect to determining independence.

The Board has determined that all members of the Audit Committee, the Finance Committee, the Human Capital Committee, and the Responsibility Committee are independent as defined under the NYSE listing standards and the director independence standards adopted by the Board.

26

    Foot Locker, Inc.

GOVERNANCE

BOARD TENURE AND TERM LIMITS

The Company is focused on having a well-constructed and high-performing Board. To that end, the Responsibility Committee selects director nominees who think and act independently and can clearly and effectively communicate their convictions. The Board does not believe long tenure alone presumptively renders a director to not be independent. Conversely, the Board recognizes the contributions experienced directors add to the Board. The Board has determined that these relationships meetits longer-tenured directors have important experience, bring diverse perspectives, and provide tangible value to the categorical standard for Relationships with Other Business EntitiesBoard and are immaterial with respect to determining independence.

the Company. The Board has also determined that all memberstheir length of tenure has allowed these directors to accumulate valuable knowledge and experience based upon their history with the Company. This knowledge and experience improves the ability of the Audit Committee,Board to provide constructive guidance and informed oversight to management. Furthermore, in the Compensation Committee,Board’s opinion, the Finance Committee,length of tenure of its members has not in any way impaired the willingness of any director to question and confront any issue or exercise independent and impartial oversight of the Nominating and Governance Committee are independent as defined underCompany in any area. The Board benefits from the NYSE listing standards andcontributions of its experienced directors who have developed insight into the director independence standards adopted byCompany over the course of their service on the Board.

 

The Responsibility Committee has specifically considered the feedback of some shareholders as well as the discussions of some commentators that suggest lengthy Board Leadership Structuretenure should be balanced with new perspectives. Specific to the Company, the Responsibility Committee has structured the Board such that there are directors of varying tenures, with new directors and perspectives joining the Board over time while retaining the institutional memory of longer-tenured directors. Longer-tenured directors, balanced with newer directors, enhance the Board’s oversight capabilities. The Board believes it is important to balance refreshment with the need to retain directors who have developed, over time, significant insight into the Company and its operations and who continue to make valuable contributions to the Company that benefit our shareholders. The Board believes that it has an appropriate mix of longer-tenured directors and newer directors, which provides an appropriate and dynamic balance.

Furthermore, the Board has not adopted formal director term limits, in part, because the imposition of director term limits on a board implicitly discounts the value of experience and continuity among directors and runs the risk of excluding experienced and potentially valuable directors as a result of an arbitrary determination. In addition, imposing this restriction means the Board would lose the contributions of longer-tenured directors who have developed a deeper knowledge and understanding of the Company over time. The Board does not believe that long tenure impairs a director’s ability to act independently of management.

BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE

 

Our Board evaluates, from time to time as appropriate, whether the same person should serve as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,CEO, or whether the positions should be held by different persons, in light of all relevant facts and circumstances and what it considers to be in the best interests of the Company and our shareholders. Since May 2016, the positions of Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerCEO have been held by Richard A.Mr. Johnson, with Dona D.Ms. Young serving as independent Lead Independent Director. The Board has utilized various leadership structures since 2010, as shown below:

 

January 2010

(GRAPHIC) 

December 2014May 2015May 2016
Positions combined, with an independent Lead DirectorPositions separated, with the former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer serving as Executive Chairman, and an independent director serving as Lead DirectorPositions separated, with an independent director serving as Non-Executive ChairmanPositions combined, with an independent Lead Director
The Board believes that, based on the Company’s current facts and circumstances, its Board leadership structure is appropriate.


Lead Director

 

The Board believes that, particularlybased on the Company’s current facts and circumstances, its Board leadership structure is appropriate.

2022PROXY STATEMENT

27

GOVERNANCE

LEAD INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR

The Board believes that, because the positions of Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerCEO are held by the same person, the appointment of ancombined, a lead independent lead director is appropriate.

 

The Lead Independent Director’s responsibilities include:

 

presiding at executive sessions of the independent directors, and Board meetings at which the Chairman is absent;
presiding at executive sessions of the independent directors, and Board meetings at which the Chairman is absent;

attending meetings of each of the Board committees;

14

    Foot Locker, Inc.attending meetings of each of the Board committees;

encouraging and facilitating active participation by, and communication among, all directors;

serving as the liaison between the independent directors and the Chairman;

approving Board meeting agendas and schedules after conferring with the Chairman and other members of the Board, as appropriate, and adding agenda items in her discretion;

possessing the authority to call meetings of the independent directors;

leading the Board’s annual CEO performance evaluation;

Corporate Governance

advising the Chairman and the committee chairs in fulfilling their designated roles and responsibilities; and

encouraging and facilitating active participation by, and communication among, all directors;

serving as the liaison between the independent directors and the Chairman;

approving Board meeting agendas and schedules after conferring with the Chairman and other members of the Board, as appropriate, and adding agenda items in her discretion;

having the authority to call meetings of the independent directors;

leading the Board’s annual performance evaluation of the Chief Executive Officer;

being available to advise the Chairman and the committee chairs in fulfilling their designated roles and responsibilities; and

performing such other functions as the Board or other directors may request.
performing such other functions as the Board or other directors may request.

 

The Board periodically considers the periodic rotation of the Lead Independent Director, from time to time, taking into account experience, continuity of leadership, and the best interests of the Company.

 

Dona D.Ms. Young currently serves as the Lead Independent Director. The Board believes that Mrs.Ms. Young is well suited to serve as Lead Independent Director, given her governance, business, and financial and governance background,background. The Board also recognizes that it benefits from Ms. Young’s tenure as well asan experienced director who has developed insight into the Company over the course of her more than eighteen years of service on our Board.the Board, which improves her ability to provide constructive, independent, and informed guidance and oversight to management.

NOTE FROM OUR LEAD INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR

 

Director On-BoardingDespite the many challenges we confronted and Educationare continuing to experience—including impacts related to the COVID-19 pandemic, supply chain disruption, inflationary pressures, and an evolving geopolitical environment—we delivered record performance in 2021. While it is important to celebrate this achievement, the Board, like management, never rests because we recognize certain headwinds in the marketplace. Our Board is engaged in confronting these challenges and believes that our strategic plan puts the Company in a position of strength. On behalf of the Board, I am pleased to share with you some highlights of the governance work we have done to navigate these challenges and make strategic choices to create long-term, consistent shareholder value:

Long-Term Strategy Oversight. The Board has overseen the long-term strategy initiatives implemented in 2021 to diversify our brands, categories, and channels, as well as expand our demographic and geographic customer base with the acquisitions of WSS and atmos. As the business and industry continue to evolve, the Board remains engaged and committed to accelerating certain initiatives in 2022 as a part of our long-term strategy to address the accelerated strategic shift to DTC by our vendors while also returning capital to shareholders, including further diversification of our merchandise and vendor mix, accelerating our off-mall pivot and key growth banner rollout, enhancing omni-channel evolution efforts, and implementing a new cost savings program.

Board Refreshment. Ongoing Board refreshment is critical to ensure we have the right mix of skills, diversity, and expertise to support the Company’s progress. We recently strengthened our Board with the election of Gina Drosos in February 2022 in anticipation of Matt McKenna’s retirement from the Board in May 2022. Gina brings significant financial, industry, and operational experience from her current role as a sitting CEO of a speciality retailer.

Succession Planning. The Board believes that a high-performing management team is critical to our success as a global brand that leads with purpose. To ensure we have the appropriate succession plan in place, the full Board is engaged in a long-term process with management to maximize the pool of emerging diverse talent who possess the skills, experiences, and attributes required to be effective leaders in light of the Company’s global business strategies, opportunities, and challenges. For additional information, see Human Capital Management and Succession Planning Oversight on page 34.

Shareholder Engagement. Our Board serves at the pleasure of you, our shareholders. Therefore, as a Board, one of our highest priorities is hearing from you, our shareholders, who have entrusted us with this responsibility. For the past five years, I have led, on behalf of our Board, a structured and governance-focused shareholder engagement program designed to accomplish this by facilitating transparency and creating a platform to receive shareholder feedback to share with the Board. For additional information, see Shareholder Engagement on page 38.

ESG. ESG is embedded in our ability to achieve our strategic imperatives. The Board has worked with management in its oversight capacity to support the integration of its ESG efforts into its over-arching growth strategy, as illustrated in our Impact Report. For example, we believe DIBs is a strategic business driver. Management and the Board have been tested in multiple ways throughout the pandemic and our diversity has proven to be an important asset, which has led us to make better strategic decisions. For additional information regarding our global ESG program and Board oversight, see ESG on page 96, ESG Oversight on page 35, and our Impact Report, which is available at investors.footlocker-inc.com/impactreport.

The Board is incredibly grateful to all our stakeholders for their continued commitment to supporting the Company.

 (GRAPHIC)

“While the Board knows that it is important to celebrate the Company’s record performance in 2021, the Board, like management, never rests because we recognize certain headwinds in the marketplace and our oversight responsibility to make the strategic decisions necessary to create long-term, consistent value for you, our shareholders.”

DONA D. YOUNG

Lead Independent Director



28

    Foot Locker, Inc.

GOVERNANCE

DIRECTOR ON-BOARDING

 

We have ana two-phase on-boarding program for new directors that is intended to educate a new director on the Company and the Board’s practices. During the first year of the director’s service, the newly-electedpractices:

(GRAPHIC) 

DIRECTOR CONTINUING EDUCATION

Director education is an ongoing process, which begins when a director meets with the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Human Resources Officer, General Counsel and Secretary, and other members of senior management, to review the Company’s business operations, financial matters, strategy, investor relations, risk management, corporate governance, composition of thejoins our Board. We host quarterly Board and its committees,committee presentations and succession and development plans. Additionally, he or she visits our stores nearseparate education sessions to keep directors appropriately apprised of key developments concerning the Company’s New York headquarters, and elsewhere, with senior management for an introduction to store operations. During this first year, new directors periodically meet with the Lead Director and with the committee chairs for an immersion into the work of the committees.following topics so they can effectively carry out their oversight responsibilities:

 

The second phase of the on-boarding program commences approximately 18 months after the director joins the Board and is specifically tailored to the individual director, taking into consideration his or her experience as a director of other public companies, the committees of our Board on which he or she serves, and areas of our business and strategy that the director would like to explore more thoroughly with management. For example, during this second phase of the program, directors participate in enhanced discussions in the areas of customer data, retail accounting and operations, and risk management, and meet with key talent. Regular check-ins with the Lead Director continue throughout the on-boarding program.(GRAPHIC) 

 

We also provide the Board with educational training, using both internal and external resources, in connection with each quarterly Board meeting and provide outside speakers on relevant topics during Board dinners. We encourage all directors to attend other continuing education programs to maintain their expertise and provide feedback toshare takeaways with the other directors on these programs. We reimburse directors for reasonable expenses incurred in attending continuing education programs. Our directors have attended a variety of continuing education programs, conferences, and events hosted by universities, trade groups, law firms, accounting firms, and other advisory service firms on a variety of topics, including the following:

 

Mandatory Resignation or Retirement(GRAPHIC) 

2022PROXY STATEMENT

29

GOVERNANCE

MANDATORY RESIGNATION OR RETIREMENT

 

The Board has established a policy whereby a non-employee director is required to advise the Responsibility Committee Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee of any change to his or hertheir principal employment. If requested by the Responsibility Committee Chair, after consultation with the other members of the Responsibility Committee, the director willis required to submit a letter of resignation to the Responsibility Committee Chair, offor the Responsibility Committee and the Committee would then meet to consider whether to accept or reject the resignation.consider.

 

The Corporate Governance Guidelines also require that directors retire from the Board at the annual meeting of shareholders following the director’s 72nd birthday.

 

Corporate Governance GuidelinesCORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

 

The Corporate Governance Guidelines assist the Board has responsibility for establishing broad corporate policies, reviewing significant developments affectingin the Company, overseeingexercise of its governance responsibilities and serve as a framework within which the Board may conduct its business, strategy, and monitoringincluding the general performance of the Company.following duties:

 

  Director Responsibilities► Director Independence► Director Qualifications
  Board Leadership Board Committees► Director Retirement Policy
  Change in Director’s Principal Employment► Director Resignation Policy► Setting Board Meeting Agendas
  Media and Stakeholder Engagement► Board Access to Management and Independent Advisors► Director Compensation
  Stock Ownership Guidelines► Director On-Boarding► Director Continuing Education
  Human Capital Management and Succession Planning Oversight► CEO and Board Evaluations► Policy on Outside Directorships

The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines.

The Board periodically reviews the guidelines and revises them, as appropriate. The Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on the corporate governance section of the Company’s corporate website atfootlocker.com/corpinvestors.footlocker-inc.com/cgg. You may also obtain a printed copy of the guidelines by writing to the Secretary at the Company’s headquarters.

 

2019 Proxy Statement    

15

Corporate Governance

Board AttendanceBOARD ATTENDANCE

 

The Board held six11 meetings during 2018. All of our directors2021. Each director attended at least 75%95% of the aggregate of the meetings of theall Board and ofcommittee meetings for the committees on which they served in 2018.during 2021.

 

The Board holds regularly scheduledregularly-scheduled executive sessions of non-managementindependent directors in conjunction with each Board meeting. Dona D.Ms. Young, as Lead Independent Director, presides at these executive sessions.

 

Directors are expected to attend annual meetings of shareholders.meetings. The annual meeting is normallytypically scheduled on the same day as a quarterly Board meeting. In 2018,2021, all of the directors attended the annual meeting.meeting, which was held virtually given the health and safety concerns surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic.

 

Retention of Outside AdvisorsRETENTION OF OUTSIDE ADVISORS

 

The Board and all of its committees have authority to retain outside advisors and consultants that they consider necessary or appropriate in carrying out their respective responsibilities. The independent accountants are retained by, and report directly to, the Audit Committee. In addition, the Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing the qualifications, performance, and compensation of the internal auditors, to which the Company has partially outsourced in part.to an independent public accounting firm. Similarly, the consultant retained by the CompensationHuman Capital Committee to assist in the evaluation ofevaluating senior executive compensation reports directly to that committee.

Board Evaluations

 

Each year, the

30

    Foot Locker, Inc.

GOVERNANCE

BOARD EVALUATIONS

The Board and its committees engage in a robust evaluationBoard and committee assessment process consistent with the Board’s goal of continuous improvement. The Nominatingevery year, and Governance Committee oversees the evaluation processa 360-degree peer and reviews the procedures, which may vary from year to year, in advance of each year’s evaluation. The process isself-assessment facilitated by an independent third party approximately every three years, both designed to elicit candid feedback regarding the areas in which the Board and its committees could improve, their effectiveness and utilizes surveys, individual interviews, and action planning.

In addition,as described in 2018, the table below. The Board enhanced its evaluation process and undertooklast conducted a 360-degree peer evaluation process facilitated by an independent third party. Each director completed an evaluation and individual interview with the third party. The Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Lead Director each received copies of the completed evaluations. The Lead Director met separately with each director, and the Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee met with the Lead Director, to discuss the results of the individual evaluations. The Board plans to conduct peer evaluations approximately every two to three years.self-assessment in 2021.

Action ItemBoard and Committee Assessment360-Degree Peer and Self-Assessment
CadenceAnnualTriennial
Assessments

Each director completes a separate detailed assessment to evaluate the Board and each committee on which they serve.

Topics covered include, among others:

►    Board and committee structure, size, composition, skills, diversity, and succession planning.

►  The effectiveness of the Board, committees, and committee chairs.

►  Board strategy and operational oversight.

►  Board culture and dynamics, including the effectiveness of discussion and debate at Board and committee meetings.

►  The quality of Board and committee agendas, meeting length, and presentations.

►  The appropriateness of Board and committee priorities.

►  Board interactions with management, including the quality of meeting materials and the information provided to the Board and committees.

Each independent director completes a detailed peer and self-assessment.

Topics covered include, among others, whether each director:

►     Demonstrates commitment to the Company’s core values.

►     Participates actively and constructively in, and is well-prepared for, Board and committee meetings.

►     Exercises independent judgment when considering issues before the Board and committees.

►     Seeks opportunities to proactively strengthen their understanding of their role as a director and are open to ongoing training and constructive feedback.

►     Brings functional expertise to the Board to augment management’s thinking and development.

►     Seeks opportunities to better understand the Company’s business and issues that are important to shareholders and offers innovative solutions to these challenges.

Reporting

The results of the assessments are processed as follows:

►    The General Counsel reviews and summarizes the responses from each director’s assessment for the Lead Independent Director and each of the committee chairs.

►    Each director participates in a confidential, open-ended, one-on-one interview facilitated by the Lead Independent Director to discuss the results of the assessments regarding Board and committee performance, and solicit input on the performance and effectiveness of the Board and the committees (except the Lead Independent Director, who meets with the Responsibility Committee Chair).

►    Each committee chair meets separately with each of its members to discuss the results of that committee’s assessment.

The results of the peer and self-evaluations are processed as follows:

►  An independent third party tabulates the results of the evaluation and prepares individual, confidential reports reflecting the directors’ peer and self-evaluation findings and recommendations.

►  The reports are provided to the Lead Independent Director, except the report on the Lead Independent Director, which is provided to the Responsibility Committee Chair.

►    The Lead Independent Director briefs the CEO on the results.

►    Confidential, open-ended, one-on-one interviews are facilitated by the Lead Independent Director and, for the Lead Independent Director, by the Responsibility Committee Chair.

Action 

Planning

These evaluations have consistently found that the Board and its committees are operating effectively.

This evaluation process has led to various refinements designed to increase Board effectiveness over the past few years, including:

►    Adding additional responsibilities for the Responsibility Committee, including overseeing the Company’s ESG efforts.

►  Ensuring that Board and committee agendas are appropriately focused on strategic priorities.

►    Increasing focus on continuous Board succession planning and refreshment.

►    Continuing to prioritize diversity when seeking new Board candidates.

►    Enhancing Board evaluation process with a 360-degree peer and self-assessment facilitated by an independent third party.

These evaluations have consistently identified development opportunities for each director. They have also found that each director:

►     Demonstrates a commitment to the Company’s core values.

►  Participates actively and constructively in, and is well-prepared for, Board and committee meetings.

►  Exercises independent judgment when considering issues before the Board and committees.

►  Seeks opportunities to proactively strengthen their understanding of their role as a director and is open to ongoing training and constructive feedback.

►     Brings functional expertise to the Board to augment management’s thinking and development.

►  Seeks opportunities to better understand the Company’s business and issues that are important to shareholders and offers innovative solutions to these challenges.

 

Stock Ownership Guidelines

2022PROXY STATEMENT

31

GOVERNANCE

STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES

 

The Board has adoptedCompany’s Stock Ownership Guidelines applicablealign the interests of non-employee directors and executives with the interests of shareholders, and promote the Company’s commitment to sound corporate governance. These guidelines apply to the Board, the Chief Executive Officer,Company’s non-employee directors, executive officers, corporate officers, and certain other covered executives. The Guidelinesparticipants are expected to achieve and maintain beneficial ownership of Common Stock having a value equal to at least the multiple indicated in the table below of the remuneration payable to them from time to time. The individual guidelines established for each participant are as follows:

 

Covered PositionStock Ownership GuidelinesMultiple
Non-employeeNon-Employee Director4x

4xAnnual Retainer Fee 

(both Cash and Equity) 

 

(GRAPHIC) 
Chief Executive Officer

6x

Annual Base Salary

 

Rate
(GRAPHIC)
Chief Operating Officer4xAnnual Base Salary Rate (GRAPHIC)
Executive Vice President

3x

Annual Base Salary Rate (GRAPHIC)

Senior Vice President; President 
Senior Vice President and General Manager

2x

Annual Base Salary

 

Rate
 (GRAPHIC)

Corporate Vice President; President 
Vice President and General Manager
Select Vice Presidents 

0.5x

Annual Base Salary

 

Rate
 (GRAPHIC)

16

    Foot Locker, Inc.

Corporate Governance

 

SharesFor purposes of unvested restricted stock, unvested restricted stock units (“RSUs”),calculating beneficial ownership, (i) Common Stock, RSUs, and deferred stock units (“DSUs”) are countedDSUs count towards ownership, for purposes of the Stock Ownership Guidelines. Performance-based RSUs (“PBRSUs”) are counted(ii) PSUs and ESPP shares count once earned. Stockearned and purchased, respectively, and (iii) stock options and shares held through the Foot Locker 401(k) Plan are disregarded in calculating ownership.disregarded.

 

Directors, the Chief Executive Officer,Executives and other covered executivesNon-Employee Directors are required to be in complianceachieve their Stock Ownership Guideline within five years of becoming subjecttheir hiring or promotion effective date that caused such employee to be covered by these guidelines.guidelines, and their election to the Board, respectively. In the event of any increase in the required ownership level, whethereither as a result of an increase in the annual retainer feeremuneration paid or base salary or an increase in the required ownership multiple, the target date for compliance with thesuch increased ownership guideline would beis five years after the effective date of such increase.

 

All executives and directors who were requiredIn the event any person subject to be in compliance with thethese guidelines as of the end of the 2018 fiscal year are in compliance. The Company measures compliance with the guidelines at the end of the prior fiscal year based on the market value of the Company’s stock at that time.

If a director, the Chief Executive Officer, or other covered executive fails to be in compliance withby the guidelines as of the end of the prior fiscal year, he or she mustapplicable compliance date, they are required to hold the net shares obtained through all future stock option exercises and restricted stock and RSU vestings, after withholding for the payment of applicable taxes, until again regaining compliance with the guidelines. Insuch person is in compliance; provided, however, that in order to take into consideration fluctuations in the Company’s stock price, any person who has been in compliance with the guidelines as of the end of at least one of the two preceding fiscal years and who has not subsequently sold shares will not be subject to thisthe holding requirement. For non-employee directors, the Nominating and Governancerequirements.

The Responsibility Committee will consider a director’sNon-Employee Director’s failure to comply with the Stock Ownership Guidelinesthese guidelines when considering that director for reelection.re-election to the Board.

 

The non-employee directors receive one-halfCompany measures compliance at the end of their annual retainer fees, including committee chair retainer fees,each fiscal year, with the compliance determination at that point in sharestime applying for the entire ensuing fiscal year, regardless of fluctuations in the Company’s stock price.

All director nominees, the CEO, and all other executives subject to these guidelines were in compliance as of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Common Stock”), withend of the balance payable in cash. Directors may elect to receive up to 100% of their annual retainer fees in stock.2021 fiscal year.

 

Political ContributionsPOLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND PUBLIC ADVOCACY

 

Our Code of Business Conduct prohibits making contributions on behalf of the Company to political parties, political action committees, political candidates, or holders of public office.

The Company is a member of severalcertain trade associations, which support their member companies by offering educational forums, public policy advocacy, networking, and advancement of issues important to the retail and footwear industries, as well as the business community generally. Given the diversity of interests, viewpoints, and broad membership represented by these trade associations, the positions they take may not always reflect the Company’s positions. Also, we monitor the use of membership dues paid to trade associations for consistency with the Company’s values and business objectives.

32

    Foot Locker, Inc.

GOVERNANCE

The Company is a member of, and has paid membership fees to, the following organizations which, as part of their overall activities, may engage in advocacy activities with regard to issues important to the retail industryor footwear industries or the business community generally.generally, as applicable:

FDRA

RILA

U.S. Chamber of Commerce

Mr. Johnson is a director of FDRA and Chairman of RILA.

 

Our Board’s Oversight of Our BusinessNotwithstanding these policies, we believe that our stakeholders look to us for leadership and to have a voice that is aligned with their values. As a purpose-driven organization, we have an obligation to add our voice and actions to drive meaningful and lasting change within our Company and the communities we serve.

 

RiskFor additional information regarding our Board’s political and public advocacy oversight, see Political and Public Advocacy Oversight on page 36.

OUR BOARD’S OVERSIGHT OF OUR BUSINESS

Oversight of the Company’s business strategy is a key responsibility of the Board, including work embedded in the Board committees. The Board believes that overseeing and monitoring strategy is a continuous process and takes a multilayered approach in exercising its duties. The Board’s oversight and management’s execution of business strategy are viewed with a long-term mindset and a focus on assessing both opportunities for, and potential risks to, the Company. In addition to financial and operational performance, other measures, including ESG goals, are discussed regularly by the Board and its committees.

The Board believes deeply that it must be fit for its purpose and provide strategic value to the Company. This dynamic has been highlighted during the COVID-19 pandemic, as the Board’s focus quickly pivoted toward protecting the communities we serve, keeping our team members safe, and maintaining financial stability for our shareholders.

While the Board and its committees oversee strategic planning, management is charged with developing and executing the business strategy. Management is completely transparent with the Board. To monitor the performance of the Company’s strategic goals, the Board maintains an open dialogue with, has regular access to, and receives ongoing updates from, management. For example, our Lead Independent Director has monthly calls with management, and each of the committee chairs regularly engages with their respective management liaisons. These discussions are enhanced with “hands-on” experiences, such as store and facility visits, to provide directors with opportunities to see strategy execution first hand.

2022PROXY STATEMENT

33

GOVERNANCE

HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT AND SUCCESSION PLANNING OVERSIGHT

The Board believes that the strength of the Company’s workforce is one of the significant contributors to our success as a global brand that leads with purpose. One of the primary responsibilities of the Board is to ensure that the Company has a high-performing CEO and management team. To meet that goal, the Board, the Human Capital Committee, the Responsibility Committee, and management share responsibility for management development and succession planning:

Responsible PartyOversight Area
Board

Oversight of these topics as part of its overall oversight role, including regular reviews of management development and succession planning to maximize the pool of emerging diverse talent who can assume top management positions without undue interruption.

In assessing possible CEO and other senior leadership candidates, our independent directors identify the skills, experiences, and attributes they believe are required to be an effective leader in light of the Company’s global business strategies, opportunities, and challenges. This process is designed to prepare the Company for both expected successions, such as those arising from anticipated retirements, as well as those occurring when executives leave unexpectedly, or due to death, disability, or other unforeseen events. Each director has complete and open access to any member of management. Members of management, including those several levels below senior management, are invited regularly to make presentations at Board and committee meetings and meet with directors in informal settings to allow the directors to form a more complete understanding of the executives’ skills and character. We maintain updated emergency succession plans for the CEO and other executive committee members. Succession reviews for key executive roles consist of an assessment of internal candidates as well as external talent identified by executive search firms.
Human Capital CommitteeAs described in its charter, primary responsibility for organizational talent and development and management succession planning, including regular reviews of executive performance, potential, and succession planning with a deeper focus than the full Board review, emphasizing career development of promising management talent. The Board made human capital management a priority through its Human Capital Committee, which oversees the Company’s strategies and initiatives on diversity and inclusion, employee well-being, compensation and benefits program, and engagement.
Responsibility CommitteeAs described in its charter, primary responsibility for reviewing and making recommendations regarding the governance and process around CEO succession planning. The Board made ESG a priority through its Responsibility Committee, which oversees the Company’s ESG efforts, including diversity and inclusion and the LEED initiative, which serve as talent recruitment tools.
ManagementCollaboration of the Chief Human Resources Officer and senior Human Resources leaders with functional leaders across the Company in developing and implementing programs to attract, assess, and develop management-level talent for possible future senior leadership positions.

For additional information on the Company’s human capital management strategies and initiatives, see our Annual Report, which is available at investors.footlocker-inc.com/ar.

34

    Foot Locker, Inc.

GOVERNANCE

ESG OVERSIGHT

The Board is actively engaged in the oversight of the Company’s global ESG program. In exercising its authority, the Board recognizes that the long-term interests of our shareholders are best advanced when considering other stakeholders and interested parties, including customers, team members, business partners, and the communities we serve. The Responsibility Committee oversees our global ESG program, and the Board receives updates from the Responsibility Committee Chair throughout the year. In addition, each of the Audit Committee, Finance Committee, and Human Capital Committee have certain ESG oversight responsibilities relevant to their respective committees.

Inspired by engagement with our shareholders, the Company has begun publishing an annual Impact Report. The Impact Report provides details on our global ESG program, consistent with the SASB reporting standards and TCFD reporting framework. Our global ESG program is focused on:

For additional information regarding our global ESG program and Board oversight, see ESG on page 96, ESG Oversight on page 35, and our Impact Report, which is available at investors.footlocker-inc.com/impactreport.

The Company has adopted the following policy statements related to its global ESG program:

Policy StatementPurpose
Global Environmental and Climate Change StatementSets out certain sustainability and environmental commitments and priorities, including reducing GHG emissions that have an adverse effect on climate change, and certain responsibilities of its suppliers. This policy statement is available at investors.footlocker-inc.com/climate.
Global Human Rights StatementSets out certain commitments, including maintaining a work environment that  respects and supports the provision of basic human rights to all of its team members around the world, regardless of the country in which they work, to the full extent permitted by law, and certain responsibilities of its suppliers. This policy statement is available at investors.footlocker-inc.com/humanrights.
Global Occupational Health and Safety StatementSets out certain commitments, including operating in a safe and responsible manner to protect the health and safety of its team members, partners, and customers, and certain responsibilities of its suppliers. This policy statement is available at investors.footlocker-inc.com/safety.
Global Water Stewardship StatementSets out certain commitments, including operating in a safe and responsible manner to protect against water risks and seeking to promote the human right to water and sanitation, and certain responsibilities of its suppliers. This policy statement is available at investors.footlocker-inc.com/water.

2022 Proxy Statement

35

GOVERNANCE

POLITICAL AND PUBLIC ADVOCACY OVERSIGHT

Our Board has political and public advocacy oversight responsibility, including ensuring that management’s political and lobbying expenditures are aligned with the Company’s strategy. The Board has adopted policies and procedures to oversee political and lobbying expenditures. As part of its ESG oversight responsibility, the Responsibility Committee reviews annually the Board’s policies and procedures regarding politics and public advocacy and that the Company’s publicly-stated positions are aligned with its related activities and spending. For additional information regarding our policies concerning political contributions and public advocacy, see Political Contributions and Public Advocacy beginning on page 32.

RISK OVERSIGHT

 

The Board has oversight responsibilities regarding risks that could affect the Company. This oversightOversight for some of these risks is conducted primarily throughassigned to the committees—largely the Audit Committee.Committee—based on the individual risk.

 

The Audit Committee has established procedures for reviewing the Company’s risks. These procedures include regular risk monitoring by management to update current risks and identify potential new and emerging risks, quarterly risk reviews by management with the Audit Committee, and an annual risk report to the full Board. In addition, the Audit Committee receives regular briefings from our Chief Information and Customer ConnectivitySecurity Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, General Counsel, headVice President of our internal audit function,Internal Audit, and outside experts on cybersecurity risks and cyber risk oversight. During these meetings, the Audit Committee and management discuss these risks, risk management activities and efforts, best practices, lessons learned from incidents at other companies, the effectiveness of our security measures, and other related matters. The Audit Committee Chair reports on the committee’s meetings, considerations, and actions to the full Board at the next Board meeting following each committeeAudit Committee meeting.

 

The CompensationHuman Capital Committee considers risk in relation to the Company’s compensation policies and practices. The CompensationHuman Capital Committee’s independent compensation consultant provides an annual report to the committee on risk relative to the Company’s compensation programs.

 

The Company believes that this process for risk oversight process is appropriate in light of the Company’s business, size, and active senior management participation, including by the Chief Executive Officer,CEO, in managing risk and holding regular discussions on risk with the Audit Committee, the CompensationHuman Capital Committee, and the Board.

 

CYBERSECURITY

2019 Proxy Statement    

17

Corporate Governance

Cybersecurity

 

We are subject to technology risks, including failures, security breaches, and cybersecurity risks, whichthat could harm our business, damage our reputation, and increase our costs in an effort to protect against such risks. Our cybersecurity program includes the following elements:

 

Technology: We employ a layered “defense, detect, and respond” strategy.
Element

Strategy

TechnologyWe employ a layered “defense, detect, and respond” strategy.
Benchmarking and External EngagementWe benchmark our security practices against other organizations and are active in the information security community.
Third-Party AssessmentsWe engage a range of outside experts to regularly assess our organizational security programs, processes, and capabilities.
Internal AssessmentsWe regularly test and improve our information systems through security risk and compliance review, user access campaigns, and other strategies.

 

Benchmarking and external engagement: We benchmark our security practices against other organizations and are active in the information security community.

PRIVACY

Third-party assessments: We engage a range of outside experts to regularly assess our organizational security programs, processes, and capabilities.

Internal assessments: We regularly test and improve our information systems through security risk and compliance review, user access campaigns, and other strategies.

Privacy

 

Our Privacy PolicyPolicies and Privacy StatementStatements govern our treatment of customer data. Our policies provide explanations of the types of customer personal information we collect, how we use and share that information, and the measures we take to protect the security of that information. Our policies provide multiple points of contact through which our customers may initiate inquiries, requests, and raise concerns to us regarding our collection, sharing, and use of their personal data. Our privacy policies and practices in the European Union were updated in 2018 in response to the EU Global Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)GDPR requirements. OurSimilarly, our privacy statements and practices in the United States are currently being reviewedwere updated in response to the requirements of the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA),CCPA, which is scheduled to comecame into force in January 2020.

 

36

    Foot Locker, Inc.

 

Code of Business Conduct

GOVERNANCE

CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT

 

The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct forapplicable to directors, officers, and all other employees, including its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Accounting Officer.team members. The Company periodically reviews the Code of Business Conduct and revises it, as appropriate. A copy of the Code of Business Conduct is available on the corporate governance section of the Company’s corporate website atfootlocker.com/corp. You may obtain a printed copy of the Code of Business Conduct by writing to the Secretary at the Company’s headquarters.

Any waivers of the Code of Business Conduct for directors and executive officers must be approved by the Audit Committee. The Company promptly discloses amendments to the Code of Business Conduct is available at investors.footlocker-inc.com/cobc, and anyall current waivers of the Code of Business Conduct for directors and executive officers on the corporate governance section of the Company’s corporate websiteare available atinvestors.footlocker-inc.com/cobcwaiversfootlocker.com/corp.

 

Global Sourcing GuidelinesGLOBAL SOURCING GUIDELINES

 

The Company has adoptedWithout a sound commitment to human rights and implementation through due diligence, jobs can be precarious, compensation can be below a living wage, and individuals can be subjected to modern day slavery, among a range of other potential impacts. Therefore, as part of our ESG program, we have policies, processes, and practices in place to systematize our human rights approach and how we respond to serious allegations. This is a public good for all stakeholders.

Our Global Sourcing Guidelines require all of our suppliers to respect certain employment standards that set outwe believe should be universal, notwithstanding more relaxed standards applicable(if any) imposed by law. In the selection of our suppliers, we work hard to choose reputable business partners who are committed to our ethical standards and business practices. The Global Sourcing Guidelines are distributed annually to each of our suppliers and each supplier agrees that, by accepting orders from us, it will abide by and implement its terms and require the productionsame from each of its subcontractors. Each of our suppliers acknowledges that its failure to honor these guidelines will compel us to reevaluate, and possibly terminate, our business relationship with them. The Global Sourcing Guidelines are an integral part of our purchase agreements with suppliers, and to assure conformity with the Global Sourcing Guidelines, we reserve the right to make periodic, unannounced inspections of their facilities, and suppliers agree to maintain and provide upon request all products sold in our stores. documentation necessary to demonstrate compliance.

Our Global Sourcing Guidelines provide the following:

StandardPolicy
Employment

We will only do business with suppliers whose workers are, in all cases, present voluntarily, compensated fairly, allowed the right of free association, and who are not put at risk of physical harm, discriminated against, or exploited in any way. For additional information regarding our commitment to human rights, see our Global Human Rights Statement available at investors.footlocker-inc.com/humanrights.

Child LaborChild labor is not permissible.
Forced Labor

Forced labor, whether in the form of prison labor, involuntary or slave labor (including human trafficking), indentured labor, bonded labor, or otherwise is not permissible. Employment must always be on a voluntary basis.

Wages and Benefits

We will only deal with suppliers who compensate their employees fairly by providing wages, overtime premiums, and benefits that, at the very least, comply with legally-mandated minimum standards.

Working Hours

We will only deal with suppliers who maintain reasonable work hours, not exceeding prevailing local standards, or any maximum prescribed by applicable laws.

Health and Safety

We will only deal with suppliers who provide their employees with a safe and healthy work environment, designed to prevent accidents and injury to health arising out of or occurring in the course of work. At a minimum, we require that suppliers comply with all applicable, legally-mandated standards for workplace health and safety. For additional information regarding our commitment to health and safety, see our Global Occupational Health and Safety Statement available at investors.footlocker-inc.com/safety.

Nondiscrimination

We believe that employment should be based on ability and not on belief or any other personal characteristics. We will only deal with suppliers who do not practice discrimination in employment, including in hiring, salary, benefits, advancement, discipline, termination, retirement, or in other aspects of employment on the basis of race, color, nationality, ethnic origin, gender, religion, age, sexual orientation, disability, or similar factors.

Harassment and Abuse

We expect all employees to be treated with respect and dignity. We will not deal with suppliers whose employees are subjected to physical, sexual, psychological, or verbal harassment or abuse.

Freedom of Association

We expect all of our suppliers to grant their employees the right to choose to affiliate with legally-sanctioned organizations or associations without interference.

Subcontracting

Our suppliers may not utilize subcontractors to manufacture our products without our prior written approval and only after the subcontractor has agreed to comply with the Global Sourcing Guidelines.

The Company periodically reviews the guidelines and revises them, as appropriate. The Global Sourcing Guidelines are available on the corporate governance section of the Company’s corporate website atfootlocker.com/corpinvestors.footlocker-inc.com/gsg. You may also obtain a printed copy of the guidelines by writing to the Secretary at the Company’s headquarters.

  

Succession Planning

The Board engages in an effective planning process to identify, evaluate, and select potential successors to the Chief Executive Officer and other members of senior management. The Chief Executive Officer reviews senior management succession planning with the Board. Each director has complete and open access to any member of management. Members of management, including those several levels below senior management, are invited regularly to make presentations at Board and committee meetings and meet with directors in informal settings to allow the directors to form a more complete understanding of the executives’ skills and character.

2022 Proxy Statement

1837

    Foot Locker, Inc.

 

 

 

 

Corporate GovernanceGOVERNANCE

SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

 

Shareholder Engagement and VotingWHY WE ENGAGE

 

The Board’s relationship with shareholders is an important part of the Company’s success. The Board believes it is important to foster long-term relationships with shareholders and understand their perspectives. The Board has a long tradition of engaging with shareholders. The Board values an open dialogue with shareholders, and the Board believes that regular communication is a critical part of the Company’s long-term success. Through these activities, the Board discusses the Company’s corporate governance, executive compensation programs, ESG, and other topics of interest to shareholders. We value ouralso closely monitor policy statements and areas of focus for shareholders. These engagement efforts allow the Board to better understand the Company’s shareholders’ viewspriorities and insights, which is why last year we extended our proactive shareholder engagement programperspectives and provide the Board with a specific focus onuseful input concerning the Company’s compensation, corporate governance, and compensation. ESG practices.

The Board is committed to:

Accountability. Drive and support leading corporate governance and board practices.

Transparency. Maintain high levels of transparency on a range of financial, governance, and ESG issues to build trust and sustain two-way dialogue.

Engagement. Proactively engage with shareholders and proxy advisory firms on a range of topics to identify emerging trends and issues to inform the Board’s thinking and approach.

This shareholder engagement program complements the ongoing dialogue throughout the year among our shareholders and our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Investor Relations team on our financial and strategic performance. Our engagement program is designed to reach out to our shareholders and hear their perspectives about issues that are important to them, both generally and with regard to the Company, and gather feedback. We believe that this engagement program promotes transparency between the Board and our shareholders and builds informed and productive relationships.

 

Beginning inWHO WE ENGAGE

During the fall of 2018,2021–22 season, our Lead Independent Director, General Counsel, and a memberthe head of managementour global ESG leadership team will have met individually with sevenshareholders representing approximately 30% of our larger shareholders,total shares outstanding, as well as proxy advisory firms, and discussed topics such as board refreshment and composition, the board evaluation process, boardroom and company culture, executive compensation, and environmental, social, and governance topics. firms.

TOPICS OF ENGAGEMENT

Board Refreshment and CompositionHuman Capital Management
Board Evaluation ProcessExecutive Compensation Programs
Boardroom and Company CultureESG

HOW WE HAVE BEEN RESPONSIVE TO ENGAGEMENT

The Lead Independent Director sharedshares the feedback gained from theseour shareholder engagement meetings with the full Board and the Nominating and GovernanceResponsibility Committee, as well as compensation-specific feedback with the Compensation Committee,Human Capital Committee. In recent years, we have taken a number of actions based on shareholder feedback to strengthen our governance practices, global ESG program, and asdisclosure. For example, the Board voluntarily adopted proxy access, amended our By-Laws to implement a result ofmajority voting standard in uncontested director elections, and added the feedback, enhancements have been madeDirector Nominees’ Skillset Matrix to this proxy statementProxy Statement to further improve transparency. As reflected indescribe each director’s qualifications. The Company also enhanced its ESG disclosure by publishing an Impact Report, which is presented consistent with the following engagement cycle, the Company overseesSASB reporting standards and TCFD reporting framework and is available at investors.footlocker-inc.com/impactreport. These examples evidence our continued commitment to remain responsive on a rigorous and comprehensivevariety of shareholder engagement process:

 

concerns. Please continue to share your thoughts or concerns at any time. The Board has established a process to facilitate communication by shareholdersshareholder communications with the Board, described below.


38

    Foot Locker, Inc.

GOVERNANCE

 

Communications with the BoardCOMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD

 

Shareholders and other interested parties who wish to communicate directly with the non-managementindependent directors of the CompanyBoard should send a letter to the Board. The Procedures for Communications with the Board of Directors, c/o Secretary, Foot Locker, Inc., 330 West 34th Street, New York, New York 10001.

Theare available at investors.footlocker-inc.com/boardcomms. Our Secretary will promptly send a copy of the communication to the Lead Independent Director, who may direct theour Secretary to send a copy of the communication to the other non-managementindependent directors and may determine whether a meeting of the non-managementindependent directors should be called to review the communication.

 

A copy of the Procedures for Communications with the Board of Directors is available on the corporate governance section of the Company’s corporate website atfootlocker.com/corpMAJORITY VOTING IN THE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS. You may obtain a printed copy of the procedures by writing to the Secretary at the Company’s headquarters.

2019 Proxy Statement    

19

Corporate Governance

Majority Voting in the Election of Directors

 

Directors must be elected by a majority of the votes cast in elections for which the number of nominees for election does not exceed the number of directors to be elected. A plurality vote standard applies to contested elections where the number of nominees exceeds the number of directors to be elected. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that any incumbent director who does not receive a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested election is required to tender his or hertheir resignation for consideration by the Nominating and GovernanceResponsibility Committee. The Nominating and GovernanceResponsibility Committee will make a recommendation to the Board whether to accept or reject the resignation, or whethertake other action should be taken.action. The director who tenders his or hertheir resignation will not participate in the Committee’sResponsibility Committee or the Board’s decision. In determining its recommendation to the Board, the Nominating and GovernanceResponsibility Committee will consider all factors that it deems relevant. Following such determination, the Company will promptly publicly disclose publicly the Board’s decision, including, if applicable, the reasons for rejecting the tendered resignation.

 

Proxy AccessPROXY ACCESS

 

Under our proxy access by-law, a shareholder, or a group of up to 20 shareholders, owning at least 3% of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock continuously for at least three years as of the date of the notice of nomination, may nominate and include in the Company’s proxy materials director nominees constituting up to two individuals or 20% of the Board, whichever is greater (subject to certain limitations set forth in the By-Laws), provided that the shareholder(s) and nominee(s) satisfy the requirements specified in the By-Laws.

 

Environmental, Social, and Governance Highlights

Foot Locker recognizes the importance of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues to shareholders and formed a global cross-functional team, including Legal, Human Resources, Supply Chain, Sourcing, and Real Estate/Construction, among other functions, to monitor our ESG efforts. The Board oversees our ESG program and receives regular updates from management.

Foot Locker’s ESG priorities are centered onOpportunity;Community;Worker Dignity; andSustainability.

Opportunity

We aim to create opportunities for all of our employees.

Employ over 49,000 people globally

Provide great jobs and inclusive advancement in retail

Women represent 46% of our total global workforce, 33% of executives, and 44% of independent directors of the Board

84% of our U.S. workforce* and 22% of the independent directors of the Board are ethnically diverse

Initiated disability hiring program to attract, hire, and retain employees with disabilities

944 employees promoted globally in 2018

*U.S. workforce represents 74% of global workforce.

20

    Foot Locker, Inc.

Corporate Governance

Fostering Diversity, Inclusion, and Equality

 

Our goal is to attract, develop, and retain employees from all walks of life. As of the fiscal year-end, women comprised 46% of our total employees globally, 33% of our executives, and 44% of our independent directors. At Foot Locker, women serve in several key leadership roles, including as Chief Financial Officer, Chief Human Resources Officer, General Counsel and Secretary, Chief Accounting Officer, Vice President—Global Total Rewards, and Vice President and General Manager, Foot Locker Pacific. As of the fiscal year-end, 84% of our U.S. employees, and 22% of the independent directors of the Board were ethnically diverse. Foot Locker treats all employees fairly regardless of their race, gender, age, ethnicity, sexual orientation, disability, or national origin. Foot Locker was recognized again in 2018 for our industry leading ESG practices with awards for Best Workplaces for Diversity, and Best Workplaces in Retail, both conferred by the Great Place to Work Institute. Foot Locker was also rated on Forbes’ Most Engaged Customer List in 2018 for its “relentless focus on the customer experience.” We are also committed to Board diversity; 66% of the independent directors are ethnically diverse or female, including our Lead Director. In 2018, the NACD honored the Board with an NACD NXT recognition award for excellence in harnessing board diversity and innovation as a strategy for building long-term value. According to NACD, Foot Locker was chosen “for its devotion to diversity and inclusion which is clearly systemic and strategic for the board, management, and operations.” We also recently created a disability hiring initiative in partnership with the National Organization on Disability at one of our distribution centers in order to establish the appropriate conditions to attract, hire, and retain employees with disabilities. Our goal is to increase the number of qualified applicants by tapping talent pools of individuals with disabilities, including veterans, and train employees with respect to disability awareness. Our commitment to diversity and inclusion is also reinforced by the Code of Business Conduct (COBC), which includes a zero-tolerance policy for any form of discrimination, harassment, or retaliation.

Advancing Careers and Developing Talent
We strive to develop a diverse pipeline of talent and provide our employees with advancement opportunities. As a retailer that values hands-on experience in our stores, our store employees have opportunities to take on higher-level field and corporate positions. The best testaments to the opportunities we provide are our employees who started out at stores and rose through the ranks to senior management positions. Employees frequently work for multiple brands and in multiple functions throughout their careers. Average non-store employee tenure (at the manager and higher levels) is 12 years. We also offer employees at all levels a variety of training opportunities, ranging from online courses to in-person workshops and multi-day programs.
At Foot Locker, we are all about developing and supporting our people. E-learning, training, and scholarships are a few ways in which we enrich employees professionally. “You Develop,” our e-learning program, features an objectives worksheet to help employees have constructive career conversations with their managers. In 2018, we launched a “Leading in a Matrix Organization” training workshop across our global offices to skill-build in the areas of collaboration and trust to enable employees to work more effectively as a team. Internal and external speakers share lessons learned during “Shoe on This” trainings (sessions are recorded and posted on our employee portal) and our online learning platform, Lynda.com, offers video courses on software and professional skills. Our Foot Locker Associate Scholarship Program awards nine $5,000 scholarships, and one $10,000 scholarship (known as the Ken C. Hicks Associate Scholarship), annually to employees.

 

 2019 2022 Proxy Statement

2139

 

 

 

Corporate Governance

Benefits
We believe we offer competitive compensation and benefits, including health and wellness benefits (i.e., medical, dental and vision coverage), financial benefits (i.e., pension, 401(k) Plan with Company matching contribution, Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) at a 15% discount, and commuter benefits), and work-life balance and lifestyle benefits (paid time off (PTO) and Employee Discount Program).
To be the best, employees need to feel their best. As part of our comprehensive benefits offering, we provide eligible employees with personalized wellness coaching. The one-on-one program integrates phone and mail-based communications with an online interactive health coach and is designed to target specific goals around nutrition, exercise, and heart health. Select facilities feature an on-site gym for convenient workouts and our employee discount platform, “YouDecide,” offers discounted rates for local fitness clubs. While health is a year-round priority, some corporate offices organize a Wellness Month with free workout classes, a health fair, and fresh fruit delivery.
We are our customers—our employees are true sneakerheads. One of the great aspects of our culture is our ability to celebrate and fuel the sneaker passion of not just our customers, but also our employees. To celebrate that passion, we offer employee product discounts and access to exclusive offerings from a range of vendors. With the ever-evolving retail landscape, Foot Locker is committed to fostering elevated in-store experiences featuring high-profile guests through vendor partnerships that make us stand out from the crowd. Our employees gain exposure to unique opportunities with athletes, celebrities, and other tastemakers who impact the youth culture that inspires and fuels the Company, as well as access to events like the New York City Marathon (employees can gain coveted entry in the race), NBA All Star Weekend, NBA Drafts, and concerts.
Ensuring Worker Safety
We are dedicated to fundamental worker safety. We strive to prevent and promptly address any employee work-related injuries. Over time, we have experienced a decrease in the number of recorded accidents and lost time from employees out of work due to work-related injuries. We have a centralized online reporting system that tracks all incidents and injuries. We analyze the information at least quarterly to assess risks and develop preventive measures. Our Risk Management team analyzes recurring injuries and issues to determine trends and if current policies or practices need to be amended or if more training is required to address risks. Our field auditors review safety measures in their audit process.
Ethics and Compliance
Culture is the foundation of everything we do at Foot Locker. We define culture as our values in action. Our culture is one of high performance, and it is how we live out our values.How we do business is just as important aswhat we do. The COBC serves as our ethical compass for the commitment we make to our stakeholders, customers, and one another. Our Global Legal Department manages our COBC program by providing training and online education, and partners with the Internal Controls Department to audit employee assessments. Employees are required to certify COBC compliance annually. When issues arise, our employees are encouraged to speak up and use our open-door process for discussing any concerns. We also provide a confidential COBC hotline. The General Counsel reports to the Audit Committee on the COBC program.
  Community
We aim to help strengthen and support local communities where we do business.
●      Raised and donated over $9 million for scholarships since 2004, plus footwear and apparel donations to several organizations
●      U.S. non-store employees permitted paid time-off for volunteering in their communities

22

    Foot Locker, Inc.

Corporate Governance

Adopt One Village Inc, a not-for-profit organization that provides aid to small villages in Ghana

At Foot Locker, we do well by doing good. Giving back to those in need and enriching people’s lives is a deep-rooted philosophy imbued in our corporate culture that extends to our employees around the world. That’s why we permit all U.S. non-store employees one paid day off each year to give back to their communities. In 2018, our employees exemplified our core value of community by uniting to effect positive change during times of need. In addition to monetary contributions from the Foot Locker Foundation and our long-standing partner, the Two Ten Footwear Foundation, we donated footwear and apparel to families in need.

The Foot Locker Foundation channels our support to those in need through educational initiatives, namely the Foot Locker Scholar Athletes Program, which awards 19 $20,000 scholarships, and one $25,000 scholarship (known as the Ken C. Hicks Scholar Athletes Scholarship), annually to student athletes since 2011. The program has invested nearly $3 million in the education and future of some of America’s most promising student athletes since 2011. We have also raised millions of dollars in support of higher education through our annual “On Our Feet” fundraising gala, benefitting hundreds of students through a joint scholarship program with our partner, the United Negro College Fund, Inc. We have raised and donated over $9 million for scholarships since 2004. In addition, Kids Foot Locker collaborates with the Boys & Girls Clubs of America (BGCA) on the “In My Shoes Challenge” by inviting children from BGCA to share their interests and what it means to them—such as sports, music, art, writing, or photography—by posting a photo and caption through social media. Foot Locker also dedicates significant resources to many other important social causes around the world, such as the Fred Jordan Missions, the Two Ten Foundation, the American Red Cross, the American Cancer Society’s Making Strides Against Breast Cancer Walk, Adopt One Village Inc. (Ghana), the Pluryn Foundation (The Netherlands), the Starlight Children’s Foundation (Australia), and the Special Olympics (Canada).

  Worker Dignity
We respect all workers involved in our supply chain.
●     Global Sourcing Guidelines (GSG) are distributed annually to our suppliers
●     Foot Locker has consolidated its private label supplier base to work more closely with fewer suppliers with deeper partnerships
●     Private label products sourced by Foot Locker are produced in China (59%), Pakistan (27%), Vietnam (10%), and Other (Thailand, United States, Portugal, Turkey, and Honduras) (4%)
Foot Locker is concerned with the safety and fair treatment of all workers involved in our supply chain, wherever the workers are located. We work hard to choose reputable business partners who are committed to ethical standards and business practices. At a minimum, we expect our suppliers to comply, and to ensure that their subcontractors comply, with all legal requirements applicable to their business. Foot Locker will only do business with suppliers whose workers are, in all cases, present voluntarily, compensated fairly and allowed the right of free association and who are neither put at risk of physical harm, discriminated against, nor exploited in any way. To this end, Foot Locker has developed GSG, which are distributed annually and require all branded and private-label vendors and suppliers globally to respect certain standards, notwithstanding more relaxed standards, if any, imposed by applicable local law. We have also developed several other policies to address specific ESG concerns, including the Anti-Corruption Policy and Conflict Minerals Policy. The GSG are incorporated into our Vendor Standards Manual. Regular factory audits are performed by a third party or our in-house auditors. Foot Locker also reserves the right to make periodic, unannounced inspections to verify compliance with the GSG. Suppliers agree to maintain and provide, upon request, all documentation necessary to demonstrate compliance. In recent years, we have taken steps to consolidate our supplier base so that we are working more closely with fewer suppliers, and deepen our partnerships with suppliers to forge a more collaborative approach grounded in continuous engagement and improvement.

2019 Proxy Statement

23

Corporate Governance

  Sustainability
We aim to enhance the sustainability of our operations and value chains.
●      Reduced energy and eliminated waste
Our dedication to reducing the environmental impact of our stores, distribution centers, and offices means implementing practices that are more efficient and reducing our waste production. These efforts both reduce our environmental impact and are cost-effective.
Energy
Foot Locker is in the process of a multi-year rollout to replace all of its fluorescent fixtures with LED lights—which consume 80% less energy than conventional lights—in its stores, warehouses, and distribution centers. Not only are these changes good for the environment, but they could reduce our annual energy costs over time and they last five to 10 times longer. We have also begun installing “lightstat” thermostats in many of our stores. These “smart” thermostats utilize a photocell to determine whether a space is occupied and resets the heating or cooling accordingly. We are also exploring other options that achieve significant energy reductions while balancing business needs. Our corporate headquarters in New York has partnered with our landlord to set corporate goals to reduce our energy consumption in our headquarters by 35%, aligning with the NYC Mayor’s commitment of reducing 80% of carbon emissions by 2050.
Distribution
Foot Locker has implemented measures to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions. We have committed to increasing the amount of freight we ship within each carrier and only shipping trucks or containers once full. We have committed to using cleaner modes of transportation and encouraging the use of fuel-saving strategies and technologies. We are also enhancing our data collection capabilities to better measure results. We are working with our vendor partners and adding mini-distribution centers into our supply chain network to accept and distribute product. This decreases shipping runs and accelerates speed of product to the customer. Our trucks frequently run overnight to reduce idling time and pollution. We also make efforts to ship intermodal when available.
Waste
Our biggest waste stream is from packaging, namely boxes used to transport and protect our merchandise as it moves from our distribution centers to stores. We curtail this waste, however, by reusing boxes within our supply chain system and for products returned to the vendors. We do not utilize hangers or tote bags for shipping. We primarily utilize corrugated and recycled boxes and sell back several thousand tons of corrugated boxes for recycling each year. We also continue to search for additional solutions, including through partnerships with our brands, suppliers, and the greater footwear and apparel industry, to reduce packaging weight and change packaging materials to decrease overall waste volume and allow for greater recycling. For example, the Retail Industry Leaders Association (RILA), of which we are a member, has convened retailers to explore ways to collect and recycle these major waste streams.

24

    Foot Locker, Inc.

(GRAPHIC) 

CommitteesOur Board consists of individuals from a diverse range of backgrounds—in terms of gender, age, ethnicity, skills, and business and Board experience—with an equally diverse range of perspectives. What our Board shares is a common desire to support and oversee management in achieving the BoardCompany’s purpose to inspire and empower youth culture.

 

The Board has delegated certain duties to its committees, which assist the Board in carrying out its responsibilities. There are five standing committees of the Board. Each independent director serves on at least two committees. The key oversight responsibilities of the committees, the current committee memberships, and the number of meetings held during 2018 are described below.

 

The Board has adopted charters for each of the Audit Committee the Compensation Committee, the(investors.footlocker-inc.com/audit), Finance Committee (investors. footlocker-inc.com/finance), Human Capital Committee (investors.footlocker-inc.com/comp), and the Nominating and Governance Committee. Copies of the charters for these committees are available on the corporate governance section of the Company’s corporate website atResponsibility Committee (investors.footlocker-inc.com/govfootlocker.com/corp). You may also obtain printed copies of these charters by writing to the Secretary at the Company’s headquarters.

 

As a general principle, the Board believes that the periodic rotation of committee and committee chair assignments on a staggered basis is desirable and provides an opportunityopportunities to foster diverse perspectiveperspectives, develops further the depth and develop breadth of knowledge within the Board.Board, and prepares the Board for future director succession. In 2018,May 2021, Mr. FeldmanMcKenna rotated off as Chair of the CompensationFinance Committee, remainingand was replaced by Mr. Oakland, and Mr. Oakland rotated off as a memberChair of the Responsibility Committee, and was replaced by Mr. Payne. In February 2022, Ms. Underhill took onDrosos was added to the role of Committee Chair.Audit and Finance Committees.

 

 

Audit

40

    Foot Locker, Inc.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

COMMITTEES

The key oversight responsibilities of the committees, the current committee memberships, and the number of meetings held during 2021 are as follows:

 

AUDIT

GUILLERMO G.
MARMOL
Chair

Other Members:
Drosos, McKenna, Nicosia,
Payne, and Young

9 meetings in 2021

  A
 (GRAPHIC) 

Key Oversight Responsibilities

KEY OVERSIGHT RESPONSIBILITIES

appoints the independent auditors

approves the independent auditors’ compensation

assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities in the following areas:

accounting policies and practices

the integrity of the Company’s financial statements

compliance with legal and regulatory requirements

the Company’s risk assessment and risk management policies

cybersecurity

the qualifications, independence, and performance of the independent auditors

the qualifications, performance, and compensation of the internal auditors

reviews and monitors compliance with the Company’s Code of Business Conduct

●  
establishes procedures for the receipt, retention, and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting and audit controls, and auditing matters

reviews and discusses risk assessments from management with respect to ESG-related risks, and relevant ESG metrics and attestations associated with these metrics

This committee consists of six independent directors, as independence is defined under the SEC and NYSE rules applicable to audit committee members. All of the members meet the expertise requirements under the NYSE rules. The Board has determined that Mr. McKenna qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined by the rules under the Exchange Act, through his relevant experience as a former senior financial executive of a large multinational corporation. The Board believes that there are other directors who would also qualify for this designation and the Board will designate a new “audit committee financial expert” upon Mr. McKenna’s retirement.

The Audit Committee Reportappears on page 101.

 

This committee consists of four independent directors, as independence is defined under the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and NYSE rules applicable to audit committee members. All of the members meet the expertise requirements under the NYSE rules. The Board has determined that Mr. McKenna qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined by the rules under the Exchange Act, through his relevant experience as a former senior financial executive of a large multinational corporation.

TheAudit Committee Reportappears on page 70.

Chair

Guillermo G. Marmol

 
 

Other Members

McKenna, Payne, Young

9meetings in 2018EXECUTIVE

 

 

RICHARD A.
JOHNSONChair

Other Members:
Marmol, Oakland, Payne,
Underhill, and Young

No meetings in 2021

 

 

KEY OVERSIGHT RESPONSIBILITY

2019 Proxy Statement

25

shares all of the powers of the Board during intervals between Board meetings, except for certain matters reserved to the Board

  

Board of Directors

Compensation  C
 (GRAPHIC) 

Key Oversight Responsibilities

determines the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer

reviews and approves all compensation for the Company’s executive management group, which consists of the executive officers and corporate officers

responsible for decisions regarding equity compensation for other employees

 assesses risk in relation to the Company’s compensation policies and practices

 administers the Company’s various compensation plans, including the incentive plans, the equity-based compensation plans, and the ESPP (other than the Company’s 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Stock Incentive Plan”), committee members are ineligible to participate in these compensation plans)

 reviews and makes recommendations to the Board concerning executive development and succession

 reviews non-employee directors’ compensation and makes recommendations to the Board concerning the form and amount of non-employee directors’ compensation

This committee consists of five independent directors, as independence is defined under the NYSE rules applicable to compensation committee members.FINANCE

 

See theSTEVEN
Compensation Discussion OAKLANDChair

Other Members:
Drosos, Feldman, McKenna,
and AnalysisWalker

5 meetings in 2021(“CD&A”) on pages 33 through 50 for a discussion of the Compensation Committee’s procedures for determining compensation, and theCompensation Committee Reporton page 50.

Chair

Kimberly Underhill

Other Members

Clark, Feldman, Oakland, Turpin

6meetings in 2018

Finance  F
 (GRAPHIC) 

Key Oversight Responsibilities

KEY OVERSIGHT RESPONSIBILITIES

reviews the Company’s financial plans and objectives

reviews and makes recommendations to the Board regarding the Company’s annual operating budget and two-year plans

● 
reviews the Company’s allocation of capital, annual capital budget for, and policies related to, capital and other expenditures

reviews and makes recommendations to the Board regarding the Company’s uses of cash, including capital expenditures, stock and bond repurchases, and dividend payments

reviews and makes recommendations to the Board regarding the Company’s cash requirements and sources of cash, including debt or equity issuances, revolving credit facilities, or other debt instruments or facilities

reviews the Company’s insurance and self-insurance reserves

reviews the Company’s derivatives policy and its use of derivatives

reviews and makes recommendations to the Board regarding proposed mergers, combinations, acquisitions, offers to purchase the Company’s shares or significant assets, divestitures, and strategic investments

reviews the Company’s Corporate Development Approvalcorporate development approval process

reviews reports from the Company’s Retirement Plan Committee regarding the asset allocation and investment performance of the Company’s North America pension funds


2022 PROXY STATEMENT

41

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

HUMAN CAPITAL

KIMBERLY
UNDERHILL Chair

Other Members:
Feldman, Marmol, and Nicosia

4 meetings in 2021

Chair

Matthew M. McKenna

 

Other Members

Clark, Feldman, Marmol, Underhill

9meetings in 2018 

 

KEY OVERSIGHT RESPONSIBILITIES

determines the CEO’s compensation

26

Foot Locker, Inc.reviews and approves the executive officers’ and corporate officers’ compensation

approves team members’ equity compensation

assesses risk in relation to the Company’s compensation policies and practices

administers the Company’s compensation plans

reviews and makes recommendations to the Board concerning executive development and succession
reviews non-employee directors’ compensation and makes recommendations to the Board concerning the form and amount of non-employee directors’ compensation

 

BoardThis committee consists of Directorsfour independent directors, as independence is defined under the NYSE rules applicable to compensation committee members.

 

See the CD&A beginning on page 50 for a discussion of the Human Capital Committee’s procedures for determining compensation, and the Human Capital Committee Report on page 69.

    
 

Nominating RESPONSIBILITY

ULICE
PAYNE, JR.Chair

Other Members:
Oakland, Underhill, Walker,
and GovernanceYoung

N4 meetings in 2021

 (GRAPHIC) 

Key Oversight Responsibilities

KEY OVERSIGHT RESPONSIBILITIES

●  
oversees corporate governance matters affecting the Company, including developing and recommending criteria and policies relating to director service and tenure

●  
establishes criteria for Board candidates

●  
retains a third-party search firm from time to time to identify potential director candidates

selects new director nominees to recommend to the Board

considers the re-nomination of existing directors after it conducts an annual review of each director’s qualifications, experience, and independence

●  

reviews membership on the Board committees and, after consultation with the Chief Executive OfficerCEO and the Lead Independent Director, makes recommendations to the Board annually regarding both committee members and committee chair assignments

  oversees the annual self-assessment process for the Board and committees

reviews trends and governance with regard to non-employee directors'nonemployee directors’ compensation

Shareholders who wish to recommend candidates for Board membership may contact
oversees the NominatingCompany’s ESG initiatives and Governance Committeereviews and considers related public reporting, including the Company’s annual Impact Report, and the role of ESG in the manner described on page 19 underCommunications with the Board.Company’s strategy


Shareholders who wish to recommend candidates for Board membership may contact the Responsibility Committee in the manner described under Communications with the Board on page 39. Shareholder nominations must be made according to the procedures required under, and within the timeframe described in, the By-Laws and underDeadlines and Procedures for Nominations and Shareholder Proposals for the 2023 Annual Meeting on page 104. Shareholder-recommended candidates and shareholder nominees whose nominations comply with these procedures will be evaluated by the Responsibility Committee in the same manner as the Company’s nominees.

42

    Foot Locker, Inc.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

This discussion relates to the compensation we pay to non-employee directors. We do not pay additional compensation to any director for service on the Board or any committee who is also a Company employee.

KEY PRINCIPLES OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PROGRAM

The Company compensates its non-employee directors for their service according to the following principles:

CategoryDescription
Pay PositionThe targeted pay position for our outside directors’ compensation program is the median of the retail and general industry market reference points.
Peer GroupsWhen establishing reference points for market comparisons of our outside directors’ compensation program, we consider the retail peer group used for our executive compensation purposes and general industry data for similarly-sized companies. See Benchmarking Approach on page 73. Shareholder-recommended candidates65 for more information on our peer group.
Pay Evaluation PerspectiveWhen assessing the competitive position of our outside directors’ compensation program, the primary focus is on total targeted compensation opportunity.
Pay MixOur outside directors’ compensation program consists of a balance of cash and shareholder nominees whose nominations complyequity, with these procedures will be evaluated byan emphasis on equity over cash. See Components of Director Compensation Program on page 44 for further information.
DifferentiationThe outside directors’ compensation provides additional compensation for leadership positions on the NominatingBoard, including lead independent director and Governance Committeecommittee chair roles. See Components of Director Compensation Program on page 44 for further information.
Stock OwnershipSignificant stock ownership guidelines established for outside directors encourage better alignment with shareholders’ interests, with compliance measured at least annually, as described further in Stock Ownership Guidelines beginning on page 32.
Deferral OpportunitiesNon-employee directors may elect to receive all or a portion of the cash component of their annual retainer fee, including committee chair retainers, in the same mannerform of DSUs or to have these amounts placed in an interest account. Directors may also elect to receive all or a portion of the stock component of their annual retainer fee in the form of DSUs. Beginning in 2022, directors may also elect to receive all or a portion of their RSU awards in the form of DSUs.
Total Compensation LimitsMeaningful limits on outside directors’ compensation have been established to ensure consistency with sound governance practices. See Components of Director Compensation Program on page 44 for further information.
Regular ReviewThe Responsibility Committee conducts regular reviews of governance practices and trends in directors’ compensation to ensure consistency of our program with sound governance practices and makes recommendations, as appropriate, to the Company’s nominees.Board. The Human Capital Committee conducts regular reviews of our outside directors’ compensation program and makes recommendations to the Board regarding the amount and form of directors’ compensation each year.

2022PROXY STATEMENT

43

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

COMPONENTS OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PROGRAM

The Company’s non-employee directors were paid in the following fees in 2021:

ChairFee

Steven OaklandAmount

Form of Payment
Annual Retainer$150,000 

Other MembersCommittee Chair Retainer

Payne, Turpin, Young

4meetings in 2018 

 
Audit Committee$25,00050% cash(1) and 50% Common Stock(2)
Finance Committee$15,000
Human Capital Committee$25,000
Responsibility Committee$15,000
Lead Independent Director Retainer$50,000Cash
Meeting Fee(3)$2,000 per Board and committee meeting
RSU Award$70,057RSUs(4)

 

Executive(1)E
 (GRAPHIC)

Key Oversight Responsibilities

●  sharesDirectors may defer all or a portion of the powersfee in the form of DSUs or have these amounts placed in an Interest Account.

(2)Directors may defer all or a portion of the fee in the form of DSUs.
(3)The Company also reimburses reasonable expenses incurred in attending Board during intervals between Boardand committee meetings, except for certain matters reserved toother meetings with management, and continuing education programs, including transportation, hotel accommodations, and meals.
(4)Beginning in 2022, directors may defer all or a portion of the Board

Chair

Richard A. Johnson

Other Members

Marmol, McKenna,

Oakland, Underhill, Young

No meetingsRSU awards in 2018

the form of DSUs.

 

Each non-employee director’s compensation, inclusive of cash and equity, is capped at $600,000 per fiscal year. Directors are eligible to receive the same discount on purchases of merchandise from our stores, catalogs, and websites that is available to team members.

2019 Proxy Statement

27

 

BoardFor all compensation periods through and including fiscal 2021, six of Directorsour current directors have previously elected to defer all or a portion of one or more of their annual retainers into DSUs, and none of the current directors have elected to place any amount of their annual retainer fees into an interest account.

 

Director CompensationGOVERNANCE

 

The Nominating and GovernanceHuman Capital Committee and CompensationResponsibility Committee jointly oversee our non-employee director compensation program, and conduct annual reviews, and make recommendations for adjustments, as appropriate, to the Board. The CompensationResponsibility Committee reviews trends and governance with regard to non-employee directors’ compensation. Following consultation with the Responsibility Committee, the Human Capital Committee reviews non-employee directors’ compensation and makes recommendations to the Board concerning the form and amount of non-employee directors’ compensation. The Nominating and Governance Committee reviews trends and governance with regard to non-employee directors’ compensation.

Our non-employee directors are paid an annual retainer fee and meeting fees for attendance at each Board and committee meeting. The Lead Director and the committee chairs are each paid additional retainer fees for service in these capacities. Our non-employee directors’ compensation program consists of a balance of cash and equity, with an emphasis on equity over cash.

 

In connection with the review conducted in fiscal year 2018,2021, the independent outside consultant on director compensation retained by the Compensation Committeeconsultant assessed the compensation paid to our non-employee directors against non-employee director compensation trends and data from our company peer group, including overall trends and governance principles, market competitiveness of our program, and the mix of cash and equity provided under our program. After consultation with the independent outside consultant, the Nominating and Governance Committee and Compensation Committee foundFollowing this review, no changes were made to the non-employee director compensation program to be appropriate, and no changes toin 2021 because the compensation program were recommended or implemented in 2018, aswas competitive with the compensation approximates theCompany’s peer group median and the pay mix is aligned with peer and broad market practice.

In February 2019, on the recommendationmedian. Other aspects of the Nominating and Governance Committee,program, including the Board placed a cap of $600,000 on non-employee directors’ compensation, inclusivemix of cash and equity, forwere found to be aligned with industry norms and best practices.

44

    Foot Locker, Inc.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

FISCAL 2021 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

The amounts paid to each non-employee director for fiscal 2021, including amounts deferred under the Stock Incentive Plan, and the RSUs granted to each fiscal year.director are reported in the tables below:

 

Key Principles of Director Compensation Program

(a)

 

 

 
Name

(b)
Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash
($)

(c)

 
Stock
Awards
($)(1)

(d)

 

 
Total
($)

Clark(2)41,00431,24672,250
Feldman111,058175,201286,259
Marmol131,547157,510289,057
McKenna124,165148,142272,307
Nicosia112,808163,878276,686
Oakland118,500158,193276,693
Payne124,262150,733274,995
Underhill121,547157,510279,057
Walker111,000146,035257,035
Young100,250275,378375,628

 

(1)Peer Groups: When establishing reference points for market comparisons of our outside directors’ compensation program, we considerColumn (c) reflects the retail peer group used for our executive compensation purposes and general industry data for similarly-sized companies. SeeBenchmarking Approachon page 45 for more information on our peer group.following three items:

(A)Pay Evaluation Perspective: When assessing the competitive position of our outside directors’ compensation program,grant date fair value determined in accordance with FASB ASC 718 for the primary focus is on total targeted compensation opportunity.

Pay Position: The targeted pay position for our outside directors’ compensation program is the median of the retail and general industry market reference points.

Pay Mix: Our outside directors’ compensation program consistsportion of a balance of cash and equity, with an emphasis on equity over cash. SeeComponents of Director Compensation Programon page 29 for further information.

Differentiation: The outside directors’ compensation provides additional compensation for leadership positions on the Board, including non-executive chair, lead director, anddirector’s annual retainer fees (including committee chair roles. SeeComponentsretainer fees) for fiscal year 2021 paid in shares of Director Compensation Programon page 29 for further information.

Common Stock Ownership: Significant stock ownership guidelines established for outside directors encourage better alignment with shareholders’ interests, with compliance measured at least annually, as described further(including any portions deferred in the form of DSUs under the Stock Ownership Guidelineson page 16.

Deferral Opportunities: Outside directors are provided withIncentive Plan) ($61.63 per share representing the opportunity to defer compensation by making additional investments in ourclosing price of a share of Common Stock on an elective basis. SeeDeferral ElectionJune 30, 2021). Such shares of Common Stock are fully vested on page 29 for further information.grant, regardless of whether deferred into DSUs.

Total Compensation Limits: Meaningful limits on outside directors’ compensation have been established to ensure consistency with sound governance practices.

Regular Review: The Nominating and Governance Committee conducts regular reviews of governance practices and trends in directors’ compensation to ensure consistency of our program with sound governance practices and makes recommendations, as appropriate, to the Board. The Compensation Committee conducts regular reviews of our outside directors’ compensation program and makes recommendations to the Board regarding the amount and form of directors’ compensation each year.

28

Foot Locker, Inc.

Board of Directors

Components of Director Compensation Program

Our non-employee directors are paid an annual retainer fee and meeting fees for attendance at each Board and committee meeting. The Lead Director and the committee chairs are each paid additional retainer fees for service in these capacities. We do not pay additional compensation to any director who is also a Company employee for service on the Board or any committee. None of the current independent directors is entitled to receive any retirement benefits.

Below is a summary of the fees paid to the non-employee directors in 2018:

Fee(B)Amount
Annual Retainer$140,000 payable 50%the grant date fair value determined in cash and 50%accordance with FASB ASC 718 for RSUs granted in Common Stock. Directors may elect to receive up to 100% of their annual retainer, including their committee chair retainer, in Common Stock. We calculate the number of shares paid to the directors for their annual retainer by dividing their retainer fee byfiscal year 2021 ($61.67 per share representing the closing price of a share of Common Stock on the last business day preceding the July stock payment date.
Committee Chair Retainers$25,000:Audit Committee Chair
$25,000:Compensation Committee Chair
$15,000:Finance Committee Chair
$15,000:Nominating and Governance Committee Chair
None:Executive Committee Chair
The committee chair retainers are paid in the same form as the annual retainer.
Lead Director Retainer$50,000 payable in cash.
Meeting Fees$2,000 per Board and committee meeting attended.
RSUsRSUs valued at $70,022 awarded to continuing directors following the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.grant date). In 2018,May 2021, each director received an award of 1,5551,136 RSUs. The number of RSUs granted was calculated by dividing $70,000 by the closing price of a share of Common Stock on the grant date ($45.03).date. The RSUs will vest in May 2019, one year following the grant date,2022, provided that the director continues to serve on the Board through the vesting date. Each RSU represents the right to receive one share of Common Stock on the vesting date. No dividends are paid or accrued on the RSU awards.

Deferral Election

Non-employee directors may elect to receive all or a portion of the cash component of their annual retainer fee, including committee chair retainers, in the form of DSUs or to have these amounts placed in an interest account. Directors may also elect to receive all or part of the stock component of their annual retainer fee in the form of DSUs. A DSU is an accounting equivalent of one share of Common Stock. The interest account is a hypothetical investment account bearing interest at the rate of 120% of the applicable federal long-term rate, compounded annually, and set as of the first day of each plan year. None of the current directors have elected to place any amount of their annual retainer fee in an interest account.

Directors’ Retirement Plan

The Directors’ Retirement Plan was frozen as of December 31, 1995. No current directors are eligible to participate in this plan. Currently, two former directors participate in the plan. The retirement benefit under this plan is $24,000 per year, payable quarterly for the lesser of 10 years after the director leaves the Board or until the director’s death.

Miscellaneous

We reimburse non-employee directors for reasonable expenses incurred in attending Board and committee meetings, other meetings with management, and continuing education programs, including their transportation, hotel accommodations, and meals. Directors and their immediate families are eligible to receive the same discount on purchases of merchandise from our stores, catalogs, and websites that is available to employees.

2019 Proxy Statement

29

Board of Directors

Fiscal 2018 Director Compensation

The amounts paid to each non-employee director for fiscal 2018, including amounts deferred under the Company’s Stock Incentive Plan, and the RSUs granted to each director are reported in the tables below:

Director Compensation

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e)
Name Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash ($)
 Stock
Awards
($)(1)
 All Other
Compensation
($)
 Total
($)
M. Clark 112,028 139,994  252,022
A. Feldman 121,425 190,831  312,256
J. Gilbert, Jr.(2) 39,384 29,115 18,000(3)86,499
G. Marmol 130,550 152,472  283,022
M. McKenna 125,552 147,470  273,022
S. Oakland 111,552 149,616  261,168
U. Payne, Jr. 104,028 139,994  244,022
C. Turpin 104,028 201,456  305,484
K. Underhill 115,153 139,994  255,147
D. Young 120,417 263,200  383,617

Notes to Director Compensation Table

(1)Column (c) reflects the following four items:

(i)the grant date fair value determined in accordance with FASB ASC 718 for the portion of a director’s annual retainer fees (including committee chair retainer fees) for fiscal year 2018 paid in shares of Common Stock (including any portions deferred in the form of DSUs under the Stock Incentive Plan) ($52.65 per share representing the closing price of a share of Common Stock on June 29, 2018). Such shares of Common Stock are fully vested on grant, regardless of whether deferred into DSUs.

(ii)the grant date fair value determined in accordance with FASB ASC 718 for the portion of a director’s quarterly retainer fees (including committee chair retainer fees) for fiscal year 2018 payable in cash but deferred in the form of DSUs under the Stock Incentive Plan ($47.29 per share for DSUs granted on January 1, 2018 (pro rated for two months of 2018 fiscal year), $43.83 per share for DSUs granted on April 1 2018, $52.04 per share for DSUs granted on July 1, 2018, and $50.20 per share for DSUs granted on October 1, 2018 representing the closing price of a share of stock on the quarterly grant date). Such shares of Common Stock are fully vested on grant.

(iii)the grant date fair value determined in accordance with FASB ASC 718 for RSUs granted in fiscal year 2018 ($45.03 per share representing the closing price of a share of Common Stock on the grant date). The RSUs will vest in May 2019. The amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions.

(iv)(C)the grant date fair value, determined in accordance with FASB ASC 718, for dividend equivalents paid on DSUs and credited in the form of additional DSUs, made to Messrs. Feldman, Oakland, Payne, and OaklandWalker, and Mmes. TurpinMses. Nicosia and Young ($41.6758.98 per share for DSUs granted on May 4, 2018, $47.16April 30, 2021, $57.06 per share for DSUs granted on August 3, 2018, $48.80July 30, 2021, $47.67 per share for DSUs granted on November 2, 2018,October 29, 2021, and $55.60$44.43 per share for DSUs granted on February 1, 2019,January 28, 2022, representing the closing price of a share of stockCommon Stock on the quarterly payment date). Such additional DSUs are fully vested on grant.

2022PROXY STATEMENT

45

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

The following table sets forth the grant date fair value of the above stock awards granted to our directors in fiscal year 2018:2021:

 

Name Stock Fees
(including
DSUs)
($)
 RSUs
($)
 Dividend
Equivalents
($)
 Total
($)
M. Clark 69,972 70,022  139,994
A. Feldman 82,450 70,022 38,359 190,831
J. Gilbert, Jr. 29,115   29,115
G. Marmol 82,450 70,022  152,472
M. McKenna 77,448 70,022  147,470
S. Oakland 77,448 70,022 2,146 149,616
U. Payne, Jr. 69,972 70,022  139,994
C. Turpin 69,972 70,022 61,462 201,456
K. Underhill 69,972 70,022  139,994
D. Young 106,000 70,022 87,178 263,200
 Stock FeesRSUsDSUsTotal
Name($)($)($)($)
Clark(2)31,24631,246
Feldman74,94270,05730,202175,201
Marmol87,45370,057157,510
McKenna78,08570,057148,142
Nicosia74,94270,05718,750163,878
Oakland82,50070,0575,636158,193
Payne79,63770,0571,039150,733
Underhill87,45370,057157,510
Walker75,00070,057978146,035
Young131,25070,05774,071275,378

 

(2)  Ms. Clark served as a director during 2021 until her retirement from the Board in May 2021.

For additional information on the valuation assumptions, refer to Note 21 to the Company’s financial statements in our 2018 Annual Report, on Form 10-K.

30

Foot Locker, Incwhich is available at investors. footlocker-inc.com/ar.

Board of Directors

 

As of the end of fiscal year 2018,2021, the number of RSUs and DSUs held by our directors waswere as follows:

 

Name RSUs Outstanding
on 02/02/19
(#)
 DSUs Outstanding
on 02/02/19
(#)
M. Clark 1,555 
A. Feldman 1,555 28,279
G. Marmol 1,555 
M. McKenna 1,555 
S. Oakland 1,555 1,582
U. Payne, Jr. 1,555 
C. Turpin 1,555 45,310
K. Underhill 1,555 
D. Young 1,555 64,779
 RSUsDSUs
Name(#)(#)
Feldman1,13630,603
Marmol, McKenna, and Underhill1,136
Nicosia1,136433
Oakland1,1365,981
Payne1,1361,314
Walker1,1361,237
Young1,13675,523

 

(2)Jarobin Gilbert, Jr. served as a director of the Company during 2018 until his retirement from the Board in May 2018.

46

(3)    Foot Locker, Inc.Reflects payments under the Director Retirement Plan.

 

Directors and Officers Indemnification and InsuranceBOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

We have purchased directors and officers liability and corporation reimbursement insurance from a group of insurers comprising ACE American Insurance Co. (Chubb), Zurich American Insurance Co., North American Specialty Insurance Co. (SwissRe), St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company (Travelers), Freedom Specialty Insurance Co. (Nationwide), Berkley Insurance Co., Argonaut Insurance Co., Beazley Insurance Company, Inc., XL Catlin Bermuda Ltd., National Union (AIG), and Endurance American Insurance Co. These policies insure the Company and all of its wholly-owned subsidiaries. They also insure all of the directors and officers of the Company and the covered subsidiaries. The policies were written for a term of 12 months, from October 12, 2018 until October 12, 2019. The total annual premium for these policies, including fees and taxes, is $914,448. Directors and officers of the Company, as well as all other employees with fiduciary responsibilities under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, are insured under policies issued by a group of insurers comprising Zurich American Insurance Co., Travelers Casualty, Surety Company of America, and ACE American Insurance Co. (Chubb), which have a total premium, including fees and taxes, of $330,250 for the 12-month period ending October 12, 2019.DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE

 

The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with its directors and officers, as approved by shareholders at the 1987 Annual Meeting.annual meeting.

 

We have purchased directors and officers liability and corporation reimbursement insurance from the following group of insurers:

►   ACE American Insurance Co. (Chubb)

►   American International Group (AIG)

►   Arch Insurance Co.

►   Argonaut Insurance Co. (Argo RE)

►   Beazley Insurance Co.

►   Berkley Insurance Co. (W.R. Berkley)

►    Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd. (Chubb)

►    Continental Casualty Co. (CNA) 

►    Endurance American Insurance Co. (Sompo International)

►    Freedom Specialty Insurance Co. (Nationwide)

►   Hartford Accident & Indemnity (The Hartford)

►   Markel Insurance Co. 

►   North American Specialty Insurance Co. (Swiss Re)

►   Zurich American Insurance Company

These policies insure all of the directors and officers of the Company and its covered subsidiaries, as well as the Company and all of its wholly-owned subsidiaries. The policies were written for a 12-month term, expiring October 12, 2022. The total annual premium for these policies, including fees and taxes, is $1,553,815.

Directors and officers of the Company, as well as all other team members with fiduciary responsibilities under ERISA, are insured under policies issued by the following group of insurers:

►   ACE American Insurance Co. (Chubb)

►   Continental asualty Co. (CNA)

►     Endurance American Insurance Co. (Sompo International)

►   Hudson Insurance Co. (Euclid)

►   Zurich American Insurance Co.

The policies were written for a 12-month term, expiring October 12, 2022. The total annual premium for these policies, including fees and taxes, is $251,168.

 2019 Proxy Statement2022PROXY STATEMENT    

3147

 

 

(GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC) 

 

The Board is asking

In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Exchange Act and the related SEC rules, our shareholders have the opportunity to approve, on acast an annual non-binding, advisory basis,vote to approve the compensation of our NEOs, as described in this Proxy Statementdisclosed beginning on pages 33 through 67.page 50 (a “Say-on-Pay” vote). We currently hold our “Say-on-Pay” vote every year. Shareholders have an opportunity to cast an advisory vote on the frequency of Say-on-Pay votes at least every six years. The next advisory vote on the frequency of the Say-on-Pay vote is expected to occur at the 2022 Annual Meeting.

 

As described in detail underin the CD&A beginning on page 33,50, our compensation program is designed to attract, motivate, and retain talented executives responsible for leading our strategic priorities and, in turn, deliver value to our shareholders. Our executive compensation program ties pay closely to performance. A significant portion of the compensation provided to the NEOs is based upon the Company’s performance or the performance of our share price, and we believe this compensation structure closely aligns the interests of our NEOsexecutives with the interests of our shareholders. The more seniorhigher an executive’s position, the greater portionpercentage of his or hertheir compensation that is tied to performance.

 

At the 2018 Annual Meeting, almost 95% of the votes cast on the advisory vote to approve the compensation of our NEOs were voted in favor of the proposal.“Say-on-Pay” received nearly 96% support at last year’s annual meeting. The CompensationHuman Capital Committee believes this affirms our shareholders’ support for the Company’s approach to executive compensation. We also have discussions with many of our shareholders on an ongoing basis regarding various corporate governance topics, including executive compensation, and take into account the views of shareholders regarding the design and effectiveness of our executive compensation program. We believe you should read the CD&A, beginning on page 50, and the compensation tables beginning on page 3370, in determining whether to approvevote in favor of this proposal.

 

The Board recommends approval ofShareholders are being asked to approve the following resolution:resolution at the Annual Meeting:

 

“RESOLVED, that the Company’s shareholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our NEOs, as disclosed in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2019 Annual Meeting pursuant to the SEC’s compensation disclosure rules, including the CD&A, the 20182021 Summary Compensation Table, and the other related tables and disclosures.”

 

As an advisory vote, this proposal is not binding on the Company, the Human Capital Committee, or the Board. However, the Human Capital Committee and the Board value the opinions expressed by shareholders in their votes on this proposal and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions regarding our NEOs.

The Board recommends a voteFORProposal 2.

2022PROXY STATEMENT

3249

Foot Locker, Inc.

 

 

 

(GRAPHIC) 

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis, or CD&A describes our compensation philosophy and objectives, and provides context for compensation decisions for our NEOs, and discussesdescribes how our 20182021 compensation is linked to performance against the goals that were established for the annualAnnual Incentive Plan and long-term incentive compensation programs. LTI.

For 2018,2021, our NEOs were as follows:

 

(GRAPHIC) (GRAPHIC) (GRAPHIC) (GRAPHIC) (GRAPHIC) 
   
RICHARD A.ANDREW E.FRANKLIN R.W. SCOTTANDREW I.
JOHNSONPAGE(1)BRACKEN(2)MARTIN(3)GRAY
     
Richard A. JohnsonChairman,Executive ViceExecutive ViceExecutive ViceExecutive
President andPresident andPresident andPresident,Vice President
Chief ExecutiveChief FinancialChief OperatingChief Strategyand Chief
OfficerOfficerOfficerand CorporateCommercial
 Lauren B. PetersDevelopmentOfficer
 Stephen D. “Jake” JacobsLewis P. Kimble*Pawan Verma
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer 

(1)Mr. Page joined the Company as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerExecutive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer— North AmericaExecutive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer— Asia PacificExecutive Vice President and Chief Information and Customer Connectivity Officer on April 12, 2021.

*(2)Mr. KimbleBracken served as Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer-International during 2018. He has beenOfficer—North America until November 15, 2021, and was promoted to Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, effective November 16, 2021.

(3)W. Scott Martin served as Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer-AsiaOfficer—Asia Pacific sinceand Chief Strategy and Development Officer until November 15, 2021, President—Asia Pacific from November 16, 2021 through March 11, 2019.17, 2022, and Executive Vice President, Chief Strategy and Corporate Development Officer, effective March 18, 2022.

 

Table of Contents

LAUREN B. PETERS(4)VIJAY TALWAR(5)
Former Executive Vice President andFormer Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial OfficerChief Executive Officer─EMEA

 

(4)Ms. Peters served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer until April 12, 2021, and retired from the Company on May 1, 2021.

(5)Mr. Talwar served as Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer—EMEA until November 17, 2021, and departed from the Company on December 16, 2021.

50

2019 Proxy Statement        Foot Locker, Inc.

33


 

 

Executive CompensationEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Executive SummaryFISCAL 2021 HIGHLIGHTS

FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

Despite the many challenges we confronted and are continuing to experience—including the COVID-19 pandemic, supply chain disruption, inflationary pressures, and an evolving geopolitical environment—we delivered record performance in 2021, which reflects the ongoing momentum we have built in our business. Highlights include the following:

(GRAPHIC) 

(1)       A reconciliation to GAAP is provided beginning on page 21 of our Annual Report, which is available at investors.footlocker-inc.com/ar.

 

Our Compensation Committee, comprised of five independent directors, oversees the executive compensation program. We design our executive2021 compensation program, to attract, motivate, and retain talented executives responsible for leadingas outlined in detail in the Company’s short- and long-term strategic priorities and, in turn, deliver valuefollowing pages, was tied to our shareholders. key objectives, demonstrating our strong connection between pay and performance.

LEADERSHIP APPOINTMENTS

As part of a planned succession strategy, in 2021, we recruited Mr. Page from outside the Company to serve as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, replacing Ms. Peters, who retired from the Company. Also, in 2021, we made certain organizational enhancements, including elevating Mr. Bracken to the new role of Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, to advance our long-term global growth and power our omni-channel ecosystem. The addition of a Chief Operating Officer creates a more streamlined and agile organizational structure that builds on the success of our geo-focused growth strategy. Both of these organizational enhancements underscore our focus on enhancing our finance and operations teams to drive organizational productivity.

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

In connection with Mr. Page’s employment, the Human Capital Committee approved a compensation package that reflects the competition for talented senior finance executives, particularly in retail companies. The Human Capital Committee set his annual base salary at $615,000. Mr. Page was (1) granted a sign-on equity award in the form of RSUs having a value on the grant date of $750,000, and (2) granted a sign-on cash payment in the amount of $500,000 (repayable if termination occurs within two years of hire). The sign-on awards were intended to replace certain stock-based awards and other compensation that Mr. Page forfeited from prior employment in connection with his recruitment to the Company. Mr. Page is also eligible to receive Annual Incentive Plan (prorated) and LTI awards (prorated) at target of 75% and 150%, respectively, of base salary. The RSU award vests one third on each of the first three anniversaries of grant subject to continued employment with the Company through the vesting dates. Mr. Page also participated in our regular annual LTI grants commensurate with his job level.

CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER

In connection with Mr. Bracken’s promotion, the Human Capital Committee approved a compensation package that reflects the increased responsibilities of his new role as well as the competition for talented senior operating executives, particularly in our industry. The Human Capital Committee set his annual base salary at $800,000 effective November 2021. Mr. Bracken was (1) granted an equity award in the form of RSUs having a value on the grant date of $600,000, and (2) eligible to receive Annual Incentive Plan (prorated) and LTI awards at target of 100% and 200%, respectively, of base salary and prorated between these targets. The RSU award vests in full on the third anniversary of grant subject to continued employment with the Company through the vesting date.

2022PROXY STATEMENT

51

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

SAY-ON-PAY SHAREHOLDER VOTE

(GRAPHIC)At our 2021 annual meeting, nearly 96% of shares voted on the advisory vote on executive compensation supported the executive compensation program. The Human Capital Committee considered the results of the 2021 Say-on-Pay vote and our shareholders’ support of our executive compensation program in reviewing the program for 2022. See page 38 for more details on our shareholder engagement program. In light of this support, the Human Capital Committee decided to retain the general program design. Beginning in 2021, the Human Capital Committee adopted a consistent mix of LTI awards. In the future, the Human Capital Committee will continue to assess the executive compensation program against changing business conditions and shareholder feedback. Our Say-on-Pay vote is currently held every year, consistent with the preference expressed by a majority of our shareholders.

COMPENSATION PROGRAM DESIGN AND STRUCTURE

PAY-FOR-PERFORMANCE

The centerpiece of our compensation program is our pay-for-performance philosophy that aligns pay outcomes tocompensation payouts with the achievementachievements of our annual operating plan and long-term strategy, and the creation ofconsequently shareholder value. This is especially trueshowcased at senior levels of the Company where a significant portion ofCompany—particularly the CEO—for which most compensation is tied to Company performance. As shown in the charts below, 92%achievement of metrics driving the CEO’s target compensation mixCompany’s operating and 80%, on average, of the other NEOs’ target compensation mix for the compensation program represented performance-based compensation for 2018.stock performance, as described below.

 

CEO’s 2018 Target Compensation Mix

 

Average of Other NEOs’ 2018 Target Compensation Mix

 



Our Key Compensation Governance Policies

What We Do

FactorClosely align executive pay with performance and Company’s strategy

Set rigorous, objective performance goals

Maintain a clawback policy

Impose and monitor meaningful stock ownership guidelines

Require a one-year time-based vesting period for earned long-term incentive plan (“LTIP”) payouts following attainment of performance goals

Include double-trigger change in control provisions in employment agreements and equity awards

Mitigate undue risk in compensation programs

Provide reasonable perquisites

Retain independent compensation consultant to advise the Compensation Committee

Hold annual “Say-on-Pay” advisory vote

Conduct shareholder outreachDescription

What We Do Not Do

No tax gross-ups for perquisites or change in control payments

No hedging of the Company’s stock

No repricing of stock options without shareholder approval

No stock options granted below fair market value

No dividends or dividend equivalents on time-based RSUs or unearned PBRSUs

No excessive severance benefits
  
  
Performance-BasedA significant proportion of the CEO’s compensation is performance-based.
  
  
Challenging GoalsRecent Annual Incentive Plan and PSU payouts underscore our pay-for-performance culture. For example, only twice in the past five years has the Annual Incentive Plan paid out greater than target and three of the past five PSU awards were not earned and paid out at 0%.
  
  
FormulaicOur Annual Incentive Plan and PSU payouts are formulaically determined based on performance against challenging financial and operating goals.
Lower Realized PayThe CEO’s five-year realized pay is expected to be lower than his five-year target compensation.
Peer BenchmarkedWe utilize an objective set of criteria to determine peer companies and position CEO pay at the peer group median.
Reasonable2021 compensation for newly-appointed and outgoing executives was determined to be reasonable.
Responsive to Say-on-Pay VoteOur Say-on-Pay support has been strong in recent years.
Compensation MixBeginning with LTI awards granted in 2021, we adopted a consistent mix of PSU awards (60%), stock option awards (20%), and RSU awards (20%).
 


3452

    Foot Locker, Inc. 

 

Executive CompensationEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Performance Highlights

We built positive momentumRecent Annual Incentive Plan and improvedLTI payouts underscore our financial results in 2018. Highlights include the following:

 

*A reconciliation to GAAP is provided beginning on page 16 of our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Impact of Company Performance on Annual and Long-Term Incentive Pay

Foot Locker strives to be a consistently high-performing company, with a history of setting very challenging performance goals.Only when we achieve or exceed our goals are incentive payouts earned.

Our most-recently completed performance periods illustrate our commitment to pay for performance. Overall, our 2018 fiscal year was very strong, and we were highly profitable; however, we fell short of our plan in certain areas of the business. As a result, Mr. Johnson, Ms. Peters, and Mr. Verma earned annual incentive payouts of 84.5% of their respective target awards for 2018.

Annual Bonus Plan for Corporate Executivespay-for-performance culture:

 

Performance MetricANNUAL INCENTIVE PLANTargetPayoutPSU AWARDS

Financial Performance Metric

(in millions) 

Adjusted Pre-Tax Income 

(weighted 80%)


$766.8

Profit Payout

87.6%

  
(GRAPHIC) 

Customer Connected Scorecard

Know Our Customers/ 

Satisfy Our Customers 

(weighted 20%)

Customer 

Connected Payout

72.1%

Total Annual Bonus Payout

(Corporate Executives)

84.5%(GRAPHIC) 

 

TARGET COMPENSATION VS. REALIZED PAY(1)

Our executives’ realized pay over the past five years further evidences our pay-for-performance philosophy. Failure to achieve the challenging threshold performance goals set for our Annual Incentive Plan awards and PSU awards results in no payout earned. Also, a decrease in the Company’s stock price results in a decrease in the value of previously-awarded stock option awards—potentially to $0— and no dilution to shareholders, as well as a decrease in the value of previously-awarded RSU awards. When our stock price increases and generates positive returns for our shareholders, the increase impacts an executive’s realized pay during the present fiscal year and for prior fiscal years during which the executive received equity awards that are held or remain subject to vesting requirements. Accordingly, a significant portion of our NEOs’ compensation is closely linked to the performance of our stock over time, motivating our executives to generate positive returns for shareholders and aligning interests.

The following chart demonstrates the relationship between the target and realized values of our CEO’s compensation for the past five years:

(GRAPHIC) 

(1)For each year, these amounts reflect the CEO’s base salary paid, Annual Incentive Plan payouts paid, values of PSU awards earned, stock option award tranches vesting during the year, and RSU awards vesting during the year. For 2020, the CEO’s realized pay includes the value of a one-time Accelerate Future Growth award earned.

 

 2019 Proxy Statement2022PROXY STATEMENT    

3553

 

 

 

Executive Compensation

As division executives, Mr. Jacobs’s and Mr. Kimble’s annual incentive awards were based on their respective division’s omni-channel profit (weighted 80%) and customer connected scorecard (weighted 20%). Mr. Jacobs earned an annual incentive payout of 157.2% of his target award. Mr. Kimble did not earn a payout for 2018.

LTIP

For the two-year 2017-18 performance period under the LTIP, no payouts were earned by any of the NEOs because our performance over this two-year period did not meet the rigorous goals we established for the period.

Performance MetricsTargetPayout

Average Annual Adjusted Net Income

(in millions)


$727.2

0% of

Target Award

Two-Year Average ROIC
15.5%

See pages 38 through 42 for more details on these incentive programs and performance goals.

Say-on-Pay Shareholder Vote

 

At our 2018 Annual Meeting, almost 95% of shareholders voting on the advisory vote on executive compensation supported the executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee considered the results of the 2018 Say-on-Pay vote and our shareholders’ strong support of our executive compensation program in reviewing the program for 2019. In light of this support, the Compensation Committee decided to retain the general program design, but added new customer connected objectives to the annual incentive plan, reflecting the Company’s customer-centric priorities, and granted a new long-term incentive intended to accelerate growth and better enable the Company to compete in a rapidly changing retail landscape. In the future, the Compensation Committee will continue to assess the executive compensation program against changing business conditions and shareholder feedback. Our Say-on-Pay vote is currently held on an annual basis, consistent with the preference expressed by a majority of our shareholders.


2018 Compensation Design ChangesEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

During the Compensation Committee’s 2018 compensation planning cycle, the Committee considered the Company’sstrategic initiatives and long-term goals, recognizing the significant disruption that was occurring in the retail industry, and discussed the actions and results that were critical to incentivize through the executive compensation program. As a result, the 2018 incentive compensation design represents a portfolio approach that is intended to motivate the right behaviors and reward achievement of our short- and long-term business results. In addition to providing incentives through the core annual cash incentive plan and LTIP, the Committee determined that an additional long-term incentive award distinctly focused on accelerating the Company’s growth, both organic and inorganic, in this disruptive environment was appropriate and in the best interests of the Company and our shareholders.

Our executive compensation program uses distinct metrics and varying time periods, which the Committee believes provide the appropriate incentives while also managing risk. The changes to the short- and long-term incentives for the NEOs, which are described below, are designed to incentivize the execution of the Company’s customer connected strategy, to accelerate our long-term growth, and to further align our executives’ and shareholders’ interests.

36

Foot Locker, Inc.

Executive CompensationCOMPENSATION MIX

Annual
Cash Incentive
Incorporated strategic metrics in addition to financial metrics into the core design of the annual incentive plan. Knowing and focusing on the customers of each of our brands increases the opportunity to provide the products and experiences they desire and increases the opportunity to satisfy our customers. Given the Company’s customer-centric culture, the Committee added “customer connected” objectives and enablers composed of additional project milestones that support these objectives to the financial metrics in the annual cash incentive program. The customer connected objectives are weighted at 20%. The remaining 80% of the annual incentive is based on pre-tax income (for corporate executives) or division omni-channel profit (for division executives).
Modified the maximum for the annual incentive performance range from 120% to 110%, which is consistent with our peers.
Long-Term
Equity Incentives
Rebalanced the annual equity awards for executives by splitting the total value of the award between stock options and time-based RSUs, rather than granting the full value of the award in stock options, in order to increase the retentive aspect of the awards.
Eliminated the cash portion of the payout for earned awards under the LTIP beginning with the 2018-19 performance period and paying the entire earned award in equity for all NEOs to further align our executives’ and shareholders’ interests.
Provided an additional long-term incentive opportunity through the Accelerate Future Growth (“AFG”) award specifically focused on accelerating the Company’s growth, expanding our direct-to-customer business, and maintaining the profitability of our “brick and mortar” stores over a three-year period (2018-20). The AFG award is 100% performance-based for the CEO and 75% performance-based for the other NEOs and is payable in RSUs.

2018 Compensation Decisions

The CompensationHuman Capital Committee made compensation decisions for our NEOs in 2018, including setting and approving incentive compensation performance goals. In making its decisions, the Committee considered (i) the significant disruption occurring in the retail industry, (ii) each executive’s compensation components in light of his or her position and responsibilities, (iii) internal peer pay comparisons, (iv) relevant market data for comparable positions and, where applicable, year-over-year changes in market data, and (v) retention and succession planning.

Base SalariesNo base salary increases were approved for the NEOs for 2018 given the Committee’s desire to provide accountability for the Company’s below-threshold performance in 2017.
CEO Annual
Incentive Award
The Committee increased the target annual incentive award for Mr. Johnson to 200% of his annual base salary, from 150% in the prior year, which positions his target total cash compensation slightly above the peer median.
AFG AwardThe Committee granted the AFG award to the NEOs that is designed to incentivize efforts to accelerate the Company’s growth, expand our direct-to-customer business, and maintain the profitability of our stores over the three-year performance period.
Long-Term
Equity Incentives
Beginning with the 2018-19 performance period, earned payouts for all NEOs will be in the form of equity, as the Committee eliminated the cash component of the LTIP awards to further align the executives’ interests with shareholders. This decision is consistent with the payout structure the Committee instituted for the CEO beginning with the 2017-18 performance period.

2019 Proxy Statement

37

Executive Compensation

Compensation Program Design and Structure

Components of Executive Compensation Program

Another goal of the Compensation Committee isseeks to align the compensation program with both our business strategy and our shareholders’ interests. In order to achieve these objectives, our executive compensation program includes both a mix of annual and long-term, compensation, as well as a mix of cash and equity, compensation. As shown in the charts below, for 2021, 90% of the CEO’s target compensation mix, and 72%, on average, of the remaining NEOs’ target compensation mix, was variable based on performance.

CEO’s 2021 TARGET COMPENSATIONAVERAGE OF REMAINING NEOs’ 2021 TARGET COMPENSATION
(GRAPHIC) (GRAPHIC) 
ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN PERFORMANCE METRICSLTI PERFORMANCE METRICS
(GRAPHIC) (GRAPHIC) 

COMPONENTS OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

The key components of our executive compensation program are described in the following chart:table:

 

(GRAPHIC) 

54

    Foot Locker, Inc.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

BASE SALARY

As part of its annual review of compensation, the Human Capital Committee approved base salary increases effective May 1, 2021, for Messrs. Bracken, Martin, Gray, and Talwar, as shown below, based on each NEO’s performance and a position-oriented analysis of market salaries.

Beginning in fiscal 2021, individual performance goals are aligned around the Company’s four strategic imperatives:

The Company strives for DIBs to be ingrained in our culture to ensure the Company is a world-class organization according to our customers, community leadership, and team members. To achieve this goal, all team members, including the NEOs, need to play a key role in our DIBs strategy, which is centered on five strategic pillars:

Within the Leverage the Power of Our People performance objective, all team members are measured against a DIBs goal:

 2022 Proxy Statement

55

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 Year-End 2020Year-End 2021Base Salary
 Base Salary RateBase Salary RateRate Increase
Name($)($)(%)
Bracken(1)575,000800,000(1)39.1
Martin and Gray600,000615,0002.5
Talwar650,000665,0002.3

Compensation
Component(1)
Description and Purpose
(GRAPHIC) Base SalaryAnnual fixed compensation supports the objective of attracting and retaining talented executives.
Provides executives with market-competitive fixed compensation appropriateMr. Bracken received an increase in his annual base salary to their position, experience, and responsibilities.
ANNUALPerformance-Based
Annual Cash
Incentive
Links annual cash compensation to attainment of short-term performance goals$615,000, effective May 2021, based on the Company’s pre-tax income, division omni-channel profit,his performance and customer connected objectives.
LTI ProgramComprises the performance-based LTIP, stock options,a position-oriented analysis of market salary. Mr. Bracken was promoted to Executive Vice President and time-based RSUs. These long-term incentivesChief Operating Officer in November 2021 and awards, which are linkedreceived a salary increase to multi-year performance goals and the Company’s stock price, provide an incentive to work towards achievement of long-term strategic objectives. Long-term incentives support executive retention.
LTIPTwo-year performance goals based on net income (70%) and ROIC (30%), with an additional one-year vesting period for earned awards. Earned awards are payable in equity.
LONG-TERMStock OptionsProvide the opportunity to purchase stock at the exercise price over a ten-year period from the grant date, subject to applicable vesting and exercisability conditions.
Link realized compensation over long-term appreciation in stock price and represent value to executives only if the stock price increases.
RSUsTime-based RSUs align executives’ and shareholders’ interests with value that fluctuates based on stock price performance.
AFG AwardAFG award incentivizes accelerated growth over a three-year period (2018-20) to build on our strength and grow our business in a disruptive retail environment. This award is 100% performance based for the CEO and 75% performance based for the other NEOs.
OTHERRetirement
Benefits
Provide pension and retirement savings benefits, which align with the objective of attracting and retaining talented executives.
PerquisitesOffer reasonable perquisites similar to our peer companies, which also aid in attracting and retaining talented executives.$800,000.

 

Base SalariesANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN

 

The Compensation Committee did not approve any base salary increases for the NEOs for 2018, given the Committee’s desire to provide accountability for the Company’s below-threshold performance in 2017.

 

Annual Bonus Plan

In 2018,Consistent with our pay-for-performance culture, the CompensationHuman Capital Committee consideredestablished rigorous Adjusted Pre-Tax Income and NPS targets for 2021. The targets the Company’s strategic initiatives relating to customer engagement and creating desired experiences in an environment where customers have many shopping choices. Given this, theHuman Capital Committee incorporated “customer connected” objectives into the annual incentive plan to further incentivize execution of our customer-centric initiatives, in addition to the financial metrics that have historically been utilized for this performance-based plan. The financial targets are weighted 80%, and the customer connected objectives are weighted 20%.

The financial targets established by the Compensation Committee under the annual incentive plan are based upon the business plan and budget reviewed and approved each year by our Finance Committee and the Board. The financial targets applicable to Mr. Johnson, Ms. Peters, and Mr. Verma were based on the Company achieving Adjusted Pre-Tax Income of $766.8$668.4 million (which accounts for 2018, in line with80% of the Company’s financial planpayout), and strategic objectives and reflects an increasea certain NPS score (which accounts for 20% of 2.2% compared to 2017 results. Actualthe payout), each as illustrated below. We drove strong Adjusted Pre-Tax Income totaled $754.1 million for 2018.in 2021, particularly given the COVID-19 pandemic and supply chain challenges.

 

The Human Capital Committee established Adjusted Pre-Tax Income as one of the performance targets in connection with the Annual Incentive Plan in 2021. This was a return to our long-standing practice after the disruptions caused by COVID-19 pandemic and social unrest in 2020, which had resulted in store closures. In 2020, sales had been established as a performance metric under the Annual Incentive Plan to allow for measurement based on when stores were open. The Annual Incentive Plan Adjusted Pre-Tax Income metric is calculated by deducting the following items from our non-GAAP income: the income related to completed acquisitions ($18 million), the income associated with minority investments ($69 million), and the effect of COVID-19 on our results ($85 million).

3856

    Foot Locker, Inc.Inc. 

 

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Executive CompensationFINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

ADJUSTED PRE-TAX INCOME

The Human Capital Committee established the 2021 Adjusted Pre-Tax Income target of $668.4 million based upon the business plan and budget reviewed each year by our Finance Committee and approved by the Board. Messrs. Johnson, Page, and Gray earned annual incentive payouts of 181.3% of their respective target awards based on strong performance against the goal. Mr. Page was appointed in 2021, so his payout was prorated for the 2021 performance period.

 

As a division executives, the 2018executive, Mr. Martin’s annual incentive targets for Mr. Jacobs and Mr. Kimbleawards were based on the Company’s Adjusted Pre-Tax Income (weighted 20%), division omni-channel profit targets(weighted 60%), and customer connected objectivesdivision NPS (weighted 20%). Mr. Martin earned an annual incentive payout of 186.7% of his target award based on strong performance against these goals.

During 2021, Mr. Bracken served as Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer—North America until November 15, 2021, and then as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, so his annual incentive award was prorated between division and corporate performance. Mr. Bracken earned annual incentive payouts of 178.7% and 181.3% of his prorated target awards for his division and corporate roles, respectively.

Ms. Peters and Mr. Talwar’s employment with the Company terminated prior to the end of 2021; they were, therefore, ineligible to receive annual incentive payouts.

In 2021, the Company’s Adjusted Pre-Tax Income was based on the following banners for each of the North America, divisionEMEA, and the International division, respectively, which include both store and direct-to-customer operations for these regions.Asia Pacific divisions:

 

In 2018, the North America division comprised the store and direct-to-customer operations of

 

(1)For 2021, atmos was excluded from the Company’s Adjusted Pre-Tax Income because this banner was acquired in November 2021 and was, therefore, not included in the Company’s targets at the time they were set by the Human Capital Committee.

(GRAPHIC) 

In 2018, the International division included the store and direct-to-customer operations of

(GRAPHIC) 

(2)For 2021, WSS was excluded from the Company’s Adjusted Pre-Tax Income because this banner was acquired in September 2021 and was, therefore, not included in the Company’s targets at the time they were set by the Human Capital Committee.

 

For competitive reasons, we do not disclose the profitAdjusted Pre-Tax Income targets for the North America, EMEA, or InternationalAsia Pacific divisions, as we do not publicly disclose results of these divisions on a separate basis, and we consider it competitively harmful to make that information public. Consistent with ourOur objective of settingis to set challenging performance goals for executives throughout the Company, weCompany. We believe that the achievement of theachieving these challenging performance goals for these divisions was demanding in light of there being a zero bonus payout for one of the divisions despite being profitable in 2018.is demanding.

 

NPS

The Human Capital Committee established the customer connected objectivesNPS targets for the NEOs based on:NEOs. NPS is a metric used to measure customer experience and predict future business growth. NPS is calculated using the answers to questions posed to customers scored on a 0-10 scale. Respondents are grouped as follows:

 

Promoters (score 9-10) are loyal enthusiasts who will keep buying and refer others, fueling growth.

Knowing our Customers- Increasing

Passives (score 7-8) are satisfied but unenthusiastic customers who are vulnerable to competitive offerings.

Detractors (score 0-6) are unhappy customers who can damage the brand and impede growth through negative word-of-mouth.

Subtracting the percentage of identified customers through in-store, digital and app touch-points for North America and International, and

Engaging and Servicing Our Customers- Improving overallDetractors from the percentage of Promoters yields the NPS, which can range from a low of -100% (if every customer satisfaction favorability percentage measured by results on purchaser surveys comparedis a Detractor) to the prior year.

Along with these objectives, thea high of 100% (if every customer is a Promoter). The Human Capital Committee established “enablers”three touchpoints for measuring progress based on:

Organizational Enrollment- Focusing all employees throughout the organizationNPS by each geographic region, each of which is assessed as a stand-alone performance to allow for balanced focus on the importanceeach area of customer-leading metricsopportunity to our go-forward strategyimprove an “omni-” customer experience: Store Post-Purchase, Digital Post-Purchase, and communicating scorecard progress;

Brand Satisfaction- Establishing a methodologyPost-Fulfillment. The survey responses are aggregated by region (North America, EMEA, and trackingAsia Pacific) and are scored individually by touchpoint. Each customer satisfaction both in-storetouchpoint has its own threshold, target, and on-line; and

Digital Enhancements- Implementing the new point-of-sale system in our global store fleet and achieving 2018 milestones in our efforts to enhance our digital capabilities.

maximum, but they ultimately roll up into one payout percentage. The evaluation of full-year customer connected objectivesNPS utilizes the Company’s global performance management rating scale, andin which performance can range from 25% -to 200% based on the relative achievement of the metricsmetrics.

2022 Proxy Statement

57

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

ESG

NPS is an ESG metric because it measures customer satisfaction and enablers. As described above, payout percentages associatedbrand perception, which are dependent on factors that include ESG. Key features of NPS are:

FeatureDescription
Linked to ESG Program“Leveraging the Power of Our People and Communities” is one of the four pillars of our global ESG program focused on ensuring that our customers enjoy world-class engagement and an environment that encourages the pursuit of excellence every day in our purpose to inspire and empower youth culture.
ReputationalNPS measures customer satisfaction and brand perception, which are influenced by customers’ sentiments concerning the Company’s ESG program.
Long TermNPS measures loyal enthusiasts who will keep buying and refer others, fueling long-term and sustainable future growth. Strong ESG principles and performance are necessary for the Company’s success over the long term, including attracting and retaining customers.
QuantifiableNPS is calculated using a 0-10 scale used to measure customer experience and predict future business growth.
No DiscretionNPS is formula-driven based upon Company performance and does not provide for discretionary adjustments.

During our engagement sessions with ratingsour shareholders, they have shared with us that they also believe NPS is a good measure of the performance of our ESG program. See page 38 for the metricsmore details on our shareholder engagement program.

To learn more about our global ESG program, see ESG on page 96, and enablers were averagedour Impact Report, which is presented consistent with SASB and resulted in an overall corporate payout percentage of 72.1%TCFD reporting standards and is available at investors.footlocker-inc.com/impactreport.

 

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

The annual incentive planAnnual Incentive Plan for the NEOs makes bonusincentive payments based upon the Company or relevant division’s results, without individual performance adjustments. ExecutivesHowever, executives who receive a “not meeting performance”expectations” rating in their annual performance review are ineligible to receive an annual bonusincentive payment. All bonusannual incentive targets and calculations are based on the results of continuing operations through the end of the 20182021 fiscal year.

 

The payment of performance-based annual cash bonuses isAnnual Incentive Plan awards are calculated asbased on a percentage of actualthe executive’s base salary earned by the executiverate during the year. The maximum payout under this plan is 200% of target, with a maximum payout in any year for any participant capped at $6 million.

 

2019 Proxy Statement

39

Executive Compensation

The 2018 annualAnnual incentive target awards for the NEOs approved by the Compensation Committee are shown in the table below.

Name 2017 Annual Target Award 2018 Annual Target Award
R. Johnson 150% 200%
L. Peters 75% 75%
S. Jacobs 100% 100%
L. Kimble 75% 75%
P. Verma 75% 75%

Bonus payouts are calculated on the basis of straight-line interpolation between the threshold (90%), target (100%), and maximum (110%) points. If the Company does not achieve threshold performance, then no annual bonus is earned or paid.

 

  Target as a
Percentage of
Base Salary
 Actual 2018
Payout
Percentage
as a
Percent
of Target
 Actual 2018
Payout ($)
R. Johnson 200% 84.5% 1,859,000
L. Peters 75% 84.5% 427,781
S. Jacobs 100% 157.2% 1,336,200
L. Kimble 75%  
P. Verma 75% 84.5% 348,562
 Target as aActual 2021 Payout 
 Percentage ofas a Percentage ofActual
 Base Salary RateTarget2021 Payout
Name(%)(%)($)
Johnson200181.34,169,900
Page(1)75181.3675,870
Bracken(2)75178.7637,298
 100181.3305,975
Martin75186.7856,032
Gray75181.3831,273
(1)Mr. Page joined the Company as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in April 2021. His target Annual Incentive Award was prorated for the 2021 performance period.

(2)Mr. Bracken, served as Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer–North America until November 2021. His target award was set at 75% of his base salary rate at that time. Mr. Bracken was promoted to Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer in November 2021. His target award was set at 100% of his base salary rate at that time. His target Annual Incentive Award was prorated for the 2021 performance period between these targets.

 

See page 35 forAll participants, including the targets, along withNEOs, are required to be employed on the adjusted actual performance forpayment date to receive payment of the period.annual incentive.

 

AFG AwardPrior to the Human Capital Committee determining whether the Annual Incentive Plan targets have been achieved, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, at the request, and for the restricted use, of the Human Capital Committee, reviews the Annual Incentive Plan calculations to ensure that the payout is calculated in accordance with the plan.

 

(GRAPHIC) The Compensation Committee considered the significant disruption occurring in the retail industry and the strategic work that would be necessary by the executives to accelerate the Company’s long-term growth in this environment. In light of this, the Committee provided an additional long-term incentive award to the NEOs and other senior executives focused on accelerating the strategic growth initiatives, expanding our direct-to-customer business, and maintaining the profitability of our stores. This AFG award is designed to encourage and reward long-term strategic achievements, as well as serve a retentive purpose for executives who are critical to executing the Company’s strategic plan. The AFG award covers a three-year performance period-2018-20-and is based on three equally-weighted metrics: total revenue growth, direct-to-customer revenue growth, and EBIT margin. Prior to granting this new award, the Finance Committee reviewed and approved the 2018-19 financial plan and the forecast for 2020 on which the metrics are based.

In determining to grant this award and the behavior to be incentivized by it, the Committee first considered the existing executive incentive programs, including the annual cash incentive awards which are based on a combination of pre-tax income (or division omni-channel profit) and customer-centric objectives, and the long-term performance-based equity awards with metrics tied to a combination of average two-year net income and ROIC. Given the desire to accelerate the pace by which the Company drives growth, both organically and inorganically, the Committee believed that it was important to provide additional incentive directly focused on profitable top-line growth, which would complement the other incentive programs during this dynamic period.

4058

    Foot Locker, Inc. 

 

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Annual incentive payments are formula-driven based upon Company performance, and our 2021 program for the NEOs does not provide for discretionary adjustments based upon individual performance. The Human Capital Committee did not exercise discretion in the amounts payable to the NEOs or any other executive officers under this incentive program.

 

Executive CompensationLTI AWARDS

 

For Mr. Johnson, 100% of the award is in the form of PBRSUs, and he would earn a payout following the end of the performance period only if the performance goals are achieved. For each of the other NEOs, 75% of the award is in the form of PBRSUs and 25% is in the form of time-based RSUs, payable following the end of the performance period, subject to the achievement of the performance goals with regard to the PBRSUs.

  Target Value of
Performance-Based
Component ($)
 Target Value of
Time-Based Payout
Component ($)
 Total Target Value ($)
R. Johnson 5,000,000  5,000,000
L. Peters 750,000 250,000 1,000,000
S. Jacobs 1,125,000 375,000 1,500,000
L. Kimble 750,000 250,000 1,000,000
P. Verma 562,500 187,500 750,000

The percentage of achievement of the performance goals at the end of the performance period will be applied to the target number of PBRSUs granted to each of the executives to determine the actual number of PBRSUs that may be earned. The percentage of the target number of PBRSUs that may be earned at threshold is 25% and at maximum is 200% for each executive. If the threshold performance goals are not met, no PBRSUs will be earned or paid out to any executive.

As the AFG performance period is on-going, we have not disclosed the actual targets because we believe it would be competitively harmful to do so. At the end of the performance period-in 2021-the Committee will determine whether the performance goals have been achieved, and we will provide specific disclosure regarding the targets, performance results relative to those targets, and the earned payouts, if any, for the completed performance period. For the time-based component of the AFG applicable to the NEOs other than Mr. Johnson, the RSUs will vest in March 2021, subject to continuous employment by the executives.

Long-Term Incentive Program

 

Our long-term incentive program includes the performance-based LTIPLTI awards include a combination of PSU awards and other long-term equity awards granted annually under the Stock Incentive Plan in the form of stock options time-based restricted stock, and RSUs. Performance-based LTIPBeginning in 2021, our LTI awards are awarded as 60% PSUs, 20% stock options, and time-based RSUs are granted annually. Time-vested restricted stock or special RSU awards normally are granted only in special circumstances, such as promotions, recruitment, or retention.20% RSUs.

 

LTIP

PSU AWARDS

The LTIP isPSU awards are designed to reward executives for achieving multi-year performance targets. The LTIP isPSU awards are formula-driven, with targets established by the CompensationHuman Capital Committee based upon financial targets included in the business plan reviewed and approved each year by our Finance Committee and approved by the Board. The LTIP pays outactual number of PSUs awarded will be based upon the Company’s performance results, without individual performance adjustments. Key design features of the LTIPPSU awards are:

 

Increased Equity ComponentFeatureThe payout structureDescription
100% Equity100% of the LTIP award had been a mix of cash payable under the LTIP, andearned payouts are made in equity in the form of RSUsPSUs payable under the Stock Incentive Plan. Beginning with the 2018-19 performance period, 100% of earned payouts will be made in equity under the Stock Incentive Plan for all of the NEOs.
Two-Year Performance PeriodSettlement at End of
and Additional One-Year
VestingThree-Year Period
The performance period is two years; however, while awardEarned payouts are calculated following the end of thea two-year performance period, payments requirebut settlement requires continued employment and areis subject to forfeiture as well asand stock price fluctuations, for another year—that is, payments are not made until the end of a three-year period.one more year.
NetTwo-Year Average
After-Tax Income and
ROIC Targets
The performance targets are based on adjusted net incomeTwo-Year Average After-Tax Income (70%) and ROIC (30%) that are contained in the business and financial plan approvedreviewed by the Finance Committee and approved by the Board for the performance period.

PSU AWARDS (2020-21)

Consistent with our pay-for-performance culture, the Human Capital Committee established Two-Year Average After-Tax Income and ROIC targets in 2020 for the 2020-21 performance period that were rigorous and appropriate in light of the Company’s prior performance, and set a “performance floor” for each performance measure. The targets the Human Capital Committee established were based on the Company achieving Two-Year Average After-Tax Income of $342.9 million (which accounts for 70% of the payout) and ROIC of 9.6% (which accounts for 30% of the payout). The Company achieved Two-Year Average After-Tax Income of $547.3 million and ROIC of 13.1% for this performance period. As a result, a 200% payout was earned for this performance period.

The targets, along with the adjusted actual performance for the period, and the calculation of ROIC are shown in the table below:

2022 Proxy Statement

59

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Mr. Page was appointed in 2021, and Messrs. Bracken, Gray, and Martin were promoted, in 2020, so their payouts were prorated for the 2020-21 performance period. Due to Ms. Peters’s retirement in 2021, she earned the pro rata portion of her PSUs due for the 2020-21 performance period based on actual performance, which will be paid at the same time as the payouts to the other NEOs in 2023.

Mr. Talwar forfeited these PSUs in connection with the termination of his employment.

The Human Capital Committee establishes certain performance targets in connection with determining the Company’s PSU payouts. The PSU payouts provide for the exclusion of certain items from such performance targets that the Human Capital Committee considers to be unusual or non-recurring. These items, if they occur, are excluded when calculating the PSU payouts, however, such unusual or non-recurring items may not be material for purposes of the non-GAAP measures presented in the Annual Report. In addition, certain items may not be adjusted for purposes of the PSU payouts, as they do not exceed a pre-established adjustment threshold, although they are adjusted for financial reporting purposes in the Annual Report consistent with past practices.

Two-Year Average After-Tax Income Calculation for 2020-21 PSU Payouts. Please note the following reconciliation:

  2021  2020  Average 
  ($ in millions)    
After-tax income:            
Net income attributable to Foot Locker, Inc. $893  $323     
After-tax adjustments excluded from GAAP:            
Impairment and other charges, net of income tax benefit of $42 million and $24 million, respectively(1)  130   93     
Other income, net of income tax expense of $80 million and $50 million, respectively(1)  (226)  (140)    
Tax charge related to revaluation of certain intellectual property rights(1)  11   25     
Tax expense related to tax law rate changes(1)  (1)  (5)    
Two-Year Average After-Tax Income (non-GAAP) $807  $296     
Disregarded items for the PSU awards, not part of non-GAAP adjustments(2)  (5)  (2)    
Two-Year Average After-Tax Income (PSU payouts) $802  $294  $548 

Target Awards are(1)See pages 21 through 22 of our Annual Report for a Percentagedescription of Base Salarythis item.

(2)The targetPSU awards are expressed as a percentageprovide for the exclusion of initial base salary—certain items that is, the base salary paidHuman Capital Committee considers unusual or non-recurring. The disregarded items permitted under the PSU awards include adjustments relating to the executive following any salary adjustments that take placeincome associated with completed acquisitions, the profit or loss from minority investments, the effect of COVID-19 on May 1 of the first year of the performance period, adjusted only for promotion-related salary increases.our results, and excess tax benefits.

60

    Foot Locker, Inc.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

ROIC Calculation for 2020-21 PSU Payouts.Please note the following reconciliation:

  2021  2020  Average 
  ($ in millions)    
Pre-tax income:            
Income before income taxes $1,240  $494     
Pre-tax adjustments excluded from GAAP:            
Impairment and other charges(1)  172   117     
Other income, net(1)  (306)  (190)    
Adjusted income before income taxes (non-GAAP) $1,106  $421     
Disregarded items for the PSU awards, not part of non-GAAP adjustments(2)  (3)  (2)    
Interest expense, net  (14)  (7)    
Adjusted EBIT (PSU awards) $1,117  $426     
+ Interest component of straight-line rent expense(1)  144   158     
Adjusted net operating profit  1,261   584     
- Adjusted income tax expense(1)  (342)  (168)    
+ Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests  1        
= Adjusted return after taxes $920  $416  $668 
Average total assets $7,589  $6,816     
- Average cash and cash equivalents  (1,242)  (1,294)    
- Average non-interest-bearing current liabilities  (1,060)  (819)    
- Average merchandise inventories  (1,095)  (1,066)    
+ 13-month average merchandise inventories  1,116   1,243     
= Average invested capital $5,308  $4,880  $5,094 
ROIC % (PSU payouts)  17.3%  8.5%  13.1%

(1)See pages 21 through 23 of our Annual Report for a description of these items.

(2)The PSU awards provide for the exclusion of certain items that the Human Capital Committee considers unusual or non-recurring. The disregarded items permitted under the PSU awards include adjustments relating to the income associated with completed acquisitions, the profit or loss from minority investments, the effect of COVID-19 on our results, and excess tax benefits.

Prior to the Human Capital Committee determining whether the PSU performance targets have been achieved, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, at the request, and for the restricted use, of the Human Capital Committee, reviews the PSU calculations to ensure that the payout is calculated in accordance with the plan.

The PSU payouts are formula-driven based upon Company performance, and our 2021 program for the NEOs does not provide for discretionary adjustments based upon individual performance. The Human Capital Committee did not exercise discretion in the amounts payable to the NEOs or any other executive officers under this incentive program.

 

 2019 Proxy Statement2022 PROXY STATEMENT    

4161

 

 

Executive CompensationEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

The target PSU awards for the 2020-21 performance period for the NEOs are listed in the following table:

 

NameTarget Award as a
a Percentage of
Base Salary Rate
(%)
R. Johnson325
Page(1)90
Bracken(2)30
 250%75
L. PetersMartin75
Gray(3)50
 100%75
S. JacobsPeters(4)100%100
L. KimbleTalwar(5)75

(1)75%Mr. Page joined the Company as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in April 2021. His target PSU award was prorated for the 2020-21 performance period.

P. Verma(2)Mr. Bracken served as Senior Vice President and General Manager, Foot Locker, Lady Foot Locker, and Kids Foot Locker until July 2020. His target award was set at 30% of his base salary rate at that time. Mr. Bracken was promoted to Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer—North America in July 2020. His target award was set at 75% of his base salary rate at that time. His target PSU award was prorated for the 2020 performance period.

(3)Mr. Gray served as Vice President and Chief Merchandising Officer—North America until July 2020. His target award was set at 50% of his base salary rate at that time. Mr. Gray was promoted to Executive Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer in July 2020. His target award was set at 75% of his base salary rate at that time. His target PSU award was prorated for the 2020 performance period.

(4)Due to Ms. Peters’s retirement in 2021, she earned the pro rata portion of her PSUs due for the 2020-21 performance period, based on actual performance, which will be paid at the same time as the payouts to the other NEOs in 2023.

(5)Mr. Talwar forfeited these PSUs in connection with the termination of his employment.

 

Determination of Payout for 2017-18 LTIP Awards.PSU AWARDS (2021-22) Consistent with our high-performance culture,

In 2021, the CompensationHuman Capital Committee established rigorous net income and ROIC targets at the beginning of 2017 for the 2017-18 performance period and set a “performance floor” for each performance measure. The targets the Compensation Committee established were based on the Company achieving two-year average annual net income of $727.2 million (which accounts for 70% of the payout) and ROIC of 15.5% (which accounts for 30% of the payout). The Company achieved two-year average annual net income of $541.6 million and ROIC of 11.9% for this performance period, which were below the threshold performance floor. As a result, no payouts were earned for this performance period. See page 36 for the targets, along with the adjusted actual performance for the period.

Determination of Performance Targets for 2018-19 LTIP Awards.In 2018, the Compensation Committee established LTIPPSU performance targets for the 2018-192021-22 performance period, which are also based on two-year average annual net incomeTwo-Year Average After-Tax Income (70%) and ROIC (30%). For competitive reasons, since this performance period is still on-going,ongoing, we have not disclosed the targets established for the period. The Human Capital Committee will determine whether payouts have been earned following the end of the Company’s 20192022 fiscal year, and we will provide specific information on the targets and results after the completion of the performance period. If awards are earned for the current 2018-192021-22 performance period, payment will be made to participating executives in 2021,2024, following the completion of a one-year time-based vesting period.

 

ROIC CalculationThe target PSU values for LTIP.Return on Invested Capital, or ROIC, is a non-GAAP financial measure. For purposes of calculating this long-term incentive, we define ROIC as follows:the NEOs for the 2021-22 performance period if the performance goals are achieved are listed in the following table:

 

NameOperating Profit After TaxesPSU Values at Target
($)
Pre-tax incomeJohnson4,830,000
+/-Page(1)interest expense/income499,519
+Brackenimplied interest portion of operating lease payments597,620
+/-Martin and GrayUnusual/non-recurring items584,250
+Talwar(2)LTIP606,173

(1)Mr. Page joined the Company as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in April 2021. His target PSU award expensewas prorated for the 2021-22 performance period.

=(2)Earnings before LTIP award expense, interest and taxes
-Estimated income tax expense
=Operating Profit After Taxes
ROIC   =
Average Invested Capital
Average total assets
-average cash and cash equivalents
-average year-end inventory
-non-interest-bearing current liabilities
+13-month average inventory
+average estimated asset baseMr. Talwar forfeited these PSUs in connection with the termination of capitalized operating leases
=Average Invested Capitalhis employment.

 

Certain items used in the calculation of ROIC for bonus purposes, such as the implied interest portion of operating lease payments, certain unusual or non-recurring items, average estimated asset base of capitalized operating leases, and 13-month average inventory, while calculated from our financial records, cannot be calculated from our audited financial statements. Prior to the Compensation Committee determining whether bonus targets have been achieved, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, at the request and for the restricted use of the Compensation Committee, reviews the bonus calculations to ensure that the payout is calculated in accordance with the plan. There is a calculation of basic ROIC, which is not precisely the same as the calculation used for incentive compensation purposes because of the exclusion of certain items (see page 49 for a discussion of disregarded items, and a reconciliation to GAAP on pages 16 through 19, of our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K).

STOCK OPTIONS AND RSUs

42

    Foot Locker, Inc.

Executive Compensation

Stock Options and RSUs

The CompensationHuman Capital Committee granted equity awards to the NEOs in 2018,2021, splitting the total value of the award between stock options and time-based RSUs in order to enhance the retentive value of the LTI awards. In prior years the annual equity award was made in the form of stock options only. In deciding to grant these awards and determining the value of the awards, the CompensationHuman Capital Committee considered each executive’s performance, position, and career potential and the competitive market for equivalent talent. For Mr. Johnson,See the approximate grant date valueGrants of hisPlan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2021 beginning on page 74 for additional information on awards was equivalent to 200% of his base salary. These awards aregranted in the Company’s 2021 fiscal year.

62

    Foot Locker, Inc.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The values shown in the chart below.Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2021 for the stock option grants in 2021 are based on the applicable Black-Scholes value on the grant date. The amounts shown in the table do not necessarily reflect the actual value that may be realized by the NEOs. The option exercise price is equal to the closing price of the Common Stock on the grant date. Stock options normally vest at the rate of one-third of the total grant per year over the first three years of the ten-year option term, subject to continuous service through each vesting date and accelerated vesting in certain limited circumstances. RSUs cliff vest generally after a period of three years based on continued employment. The CompensationHuman Capital Committee does not normally consider an executive’s gains from prior stock awards in granting new awards.awards as compensation in the current year. The Human Capital Committee determines the number of options granted based on a fixed value, using the Black-Scholes value on the grant date.

SPECIAL RSU AWARDS

The values shown belowHuman Capital Committee granted special RSU awards in 2021 to Mr. Page at sign-on, as discussed above, in order to replace compensation Mr. Page forfeited when he was recruited by us, and to Mr. Bracken in connection with his promotion to Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, and to Messrs. Martin and Gray for retention purposes. In deciding to grant these awards and determining the stock option grants are based on a Black-Scholes value of $12.35the awards, the Human Capital Committee considered each executive’s position, including those with expanded scope and responsibilities, and the Company’s recruiting needs. Messrs. Martin and Gray received special one-time RSU awards for retention purposes. In approving such one-time awards, the Human Capital Committee considered the need to ensure management stability and continuity, as well as labor market conditions and competition for top talent in the current environment and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Human Capital Committee also viewed the one-time awards as necessary in connection with the Company’s succession planning for key roles. The Human Capital Committee determined that the one-time awards were in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. For Mr. Page, the RSUs will vest on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date (a long-term incentive similar to the Company’s annual grant of RSUs), subject to his continued employment through each such anniversary date. All of the special awards for Messrs. Bracken, Martin, and Gray will vest on the third anniversary of the grant date, subject to continued employment through the vesting date. All of these values, and corresponding grant dates, are shown in the table below.

 

Name Stock Options
(#)
 Grant Date Fair Value
($)
 RSUs
(#)
 Grant Date Fair Value
($)
R. Johnson 91,093 1,124,999 25,123 1,125,008
L. Peters 20,243 250,001 5,583 250,007
S. Jacobs 20,243 250,001 5,583 250,007
L. Kimble 18,219 225,005 5,025 225,020
P. Verma 12,146 150,003 3,350 150,013
   RSUs  RSUs  Grant Date 
   04/12/21  11/16/21  Fair Value 
Name  (#)  (#)  ($) 
Page   12,557      750,030 
Bracken      10,661   600,001 
Martin      3,554   200,019 
Gray      5,331   300,029 

 

RETIREMENT PLAN AND EXCESS CASH PLAN

The NEOs, other than Mr. Page, because the plans were frozen for new participants as of December 31, 2019, and Ms. Peters and Mr. Talwar, who have departed the organization, participate in the Retirement Plan and the Excess Cash Balance Plan

All U.S.-based associates and expatriate U.S. employees of the Company who meet the eligibility requirements are participants in the Foot Locker Retirement Plan (the “Retirement Plan”). The Retirement Plan andPlan. These plans, as well as the method of calculating benefits payable under itthese plans, are described beginning on page 63. All of the NEOs are participants in the Retirement Plan. The Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) limits the amount of compensation that may be taken into consideration in determining an individual’s retirement benefits. Therefore, those participants in the Retirement Plan whose compensation exceeds the IRC limit are also participants in the Excess Cash Balance Plan, described on page 63, which provides a benefit equal to the difference between the amount a participant receives from the Retirement Plan and the amount the participant would have received were it not for the IRC limits. The Retirement Plan and Excess Cash Balance Plan take into account only base salary and annual bonus in determining pension benefits. Therefore, long-term incentives, stock options, and stock awards have no effect on the calculation of benefits or payments under these plans.88.

 

401(k) PlanPLAN AND EXCESS SAVINGS PLAN

 

The Company has a 401(k) Plan that is available to employees whose primary place of employment is in the United States, as well as to expatriate U.S. employees. Eligible associates may contribute to the 401(k) Plan following 28 days of employmentMessrs. Johnson, Bracken, Martin, and are eligible for Company matching contributions upon completion of one year of service consisting of at least 1,000 hours. All of the NEOsGray participate in the 401(k) Plan other than Mr. Kimble. Asand the Excess Savings Plan. These plans, as well as the method of January 1, 2019, the 401(k) Plan allows eligible employees to contribute up to 40% of their compensationcalculating contributions under these plans, are described on a pre-tax basis, subject to a maximum of $19,000. The Company matches 25% of employees’ pre-tax contributions on up to the first 4% of the employees’ compensation (subject to certain limitations). The matching contribution is made in cash. Matching contributions are vested incrementally over the first five years of participation. See Note 6 to the Summary Compensation Table on pages 53 through 54 for the amount of the Company match for each of the NEOs.page 90.

 

Supplemental Executive Retirement PlanSUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN

 

The Company maintains a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “SERP”), described on page 64,SERP for certain senior officers of the Company and other key employees, including the NEOs. The SERP is an unfunded plan that sets an annual target for each participant consisting of a percentage of base salary and annual bonus based onNEOs who met the Company’s performance against target. This is the same target as set under the Annual Bonus Plan. Contributions range from 4% to 12% of salary and annual bonus, depending on the Company’s performance against an established target, with an 8% contribution made for target performance. The Compensation Committee establishes the SERP target each year, and it is normally the same as the performance target under

2019 Proxy Statement

43

Executive Compensation

the annual bonus plan. In addition, performance-based participant accounts accrue interest at the rate of 6% annually. The SERP also provides for the continuation of medical and dental insurance benefits following retirement to vested participants who were participants in the SERPeligibility requirements prior to the start of the 2014 fiscal year when this benefit was closed toplan being frozen for new participants.

Based upon the Company’s performance in 2018, a credit of 7.3% of 2018 base salary was made to the SERPparticipants (including rehires) after December 31, 2018. See page 90 for each of the NEOs. Credits to the SERP are based only on base salary and annual bonus, if paid; therefore, long-term incentives, stock options, and stock awards have no effect on the calculation of benefits or payments under this plan. As of the end of 2018, the account balances of the NEOs ranged from $178,053 for Mr. Verma to $2,449,041 for Mr. Johnson. Under the terms of the SERP, executives are vested in their account balances based upon a combination of age and service. As of the end of 2018, all of the NEOs, other than Mr. Verma who has not yet met the age and service requirements, were vested inadditional information regarding the SERP.

 

International Assignment CompensationINTERNATIONAL ASSIGNMENT COMPENSATION

 

We provide employeesteam members on long-term international assignments such as Mr. Kimble, with additional benefits and allowances that are designed to minimize any financial detriment or gain to the employeeteam member from an international assignment. ForExcept for Expatriate Tax Payments, none of the NEOs, other than Mr. Kimble, who wasTalwar, received any compensation under the only NEO who was an expatriate employee in 2018, we provided benefits and allowances for certain goods and services differential, housing, automobile costs, and tax preparation assistance.IAP during 2021.

2022 PROXY STATEMENT

63

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

PerquisitesPERQUISITES

 

We provide the NEOs with certain perquisites, which the CompensationHuman Capital Committee believes to be reasonable and consistent with its overall objective of attracting and retaining talented executives.executives in a competitive labor market. The Company provides the NEOs with an automobile allowance, financial planning,reimbursement, medical expense allowance,reimbursement, supplemental long-term disability insurance, and life insurance.financial planning. In addition, the Company reimburses Mr. Johnson for reasonable expenses of using car service expenses for transportation in the New York metropolitan area.area for increased personal security and efficiency. We also provide for continuation of medical and dental insurance benefits following retirement to participants who vested in the SERP prior to the start of the 2014 fiscal year when the benefit became closed to new participants.February 2, 2014. We do not provide a gross-up to executives for the income tax liability they incur due to their receipt of these perquisites.

 

Executive Employment AgreementsEMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS AND OTHER ARRANGEMENTS

 

As more fully described on pages 5472 through 55,73, we have employment agreements with each of our NEOs.NEOs, except Messrs. Page, Bracken, and Gray. Other than the agreement with Mr. Johnson, as CEO, the agreements are substantially in the same form.

 

Our employment agreements with the NEOs provide for severance payments to the executive if we terminate the executive’s employment without cause or if the executive terminates his or her employment for good reason. These payments to the NEOs, calculated as if termination of employment occurred at the end of our last fiscal year, are set out in the tables on pages 65 through 67.

The NEOs would receive an enhanced severance payment if the executive’s employment is terminated without cause or if the executive terminates employment for good reason within two years following a change in control. For an executive to receive the enhanced severance payment, two events must occur: first, employment must be terminated for one of the specified reasons, and second, this termination must occur within two years following a change in control. We believe that these provisions, which we have had in place for a number of years, provide appropriate protection to our executives, comparable to that available at other public companies, and, with regard to the enhanced severance following a change in control, protect us from losing key executives during a period when a change in control may be threatened or pending. None of the NEOs is entitled to a gross-up payment for any excise taxes that may become payable in connection with a change in control.

All of the NEOs have agreed in their employment contracts not to compete with the Company for two years following their termination of employment and not to hire Company employees during that same period. This restriction does not apply following a change in control.

44

    Foot Locker, Inc.

Executive CompensationPROCEDURES FOR DETERMINING COMPENSATION

 

Procedures for Determining Compensation

Setting Compensation, Establishing Goals, and Evaluating PerformanceSETTING COMPENSATION, ESTABLISHING GOALS, AND EVALUATING PERFORMANCE

 

As reflected in the following timeline, the CompensationHuman Capital Committee oversees a rigorous and comprehensive compensation approval, goal setting, and performance review process:

 

 

Year-Round:

Annual ReviewThe Compensation Committee reviews any feedback from shareholder engagement meetings
and Approvalsregarding the compensation program.
(January -At its February meeting, the Committee discusses further refined planning and preliminary
March)recommendations for the following fiscal year’s compensation program.
 (GRAPHIC)At its March meeting, final recommendations are presented, and the Committee approves the executive compensation design, components, and awards for each executive, and establishes the applicable annual bonus and LTIP performance goals. The Committee meets privately with the independent consultant to review and approve the CEO’s compensation.

Compensation
Planning
(May -
November)

 (GRAPHIC)

During its meetings over this period, the Committee has preliminary discussions with management and compensation consultants regarding the compensation program design for the following year, including reviewing compensation trends, peer group composition, a competitive analysis of individual executives’ compensation relative to market, preliminary pay recommendations, and the current incentive payout forecast. The Committee provides feedback and direction regarding the program design for the next fiscal year.
The Committee meets privately with the independent consultant regarding the CEO’s compensation.
Additional
Reviews
(During Year)
The CompensationHuman Capital Committee meets at other times duringthroughout the year with management and privately with the independent consultant to review performance against the established performance goals, discuss developments and emerging trends, and to review specific issues related to executive compensation or other issues related toand management resources.resources issues. The CompensationHuman Capital Committee is also has
responsibilityresponsible each year for annually reviewing the compensation paid to non-employee directors and making recommendations to the full Board regarding the directors’ compensation program.


64

    Foot Locker, Inc. 

 

Each year, in advance of making compensation decisions for the forthcoming year, the Compensation Committee meets with management and reviews the Company’s overall executive compensation program in light of the Company’s long-term strategy and financial objectives approved by the Finance Committee and the Board. The Committee meets with management, the Company’s compensation consultant, and the Committee’s independent compensation consultant to review the executive compensation environment, including recent developments and trends in executive compensation relative to the Company’s executive compensation program, and a historical view of the pay-for-performance correlation in the program and any changes to the program being recommended by management or either of the consultants.

After the financial results for the prior year have been finalized and audited, the Compensation Committee meets to review and approve bonus and incentive compensation payments for the prior year and to review and approve compensation arrangements—base salaries, stock awards, and incentive plan targets—for the upcoming year. The Compensation Committee meets privately with its independent compensation consultant for the purpose of establishing the compensation of the CEO, including establishing target awards under the Annual Bonus Plan and the LTIP, and making stock awards to him under the Stock Incentive Plan. Except in the case of promotions or other unusual circumstances, the Compensation Committee considers granting stock awards only at this meeting, which is normally held within a few weeks following the issuance of the Company’s full-year earnings release for the prior year.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Benchmarking ApproachBENCHMARKING APPROACH

 

We have established benchmarks for compensation, including cash and equity, for each NEO. These benchmarks are reviewed annually and are based upon compensation for comparable positions in a peer group consisting of publicly-traded athletic footwear and apparel retailers and other specialty retail companies having revenues of approximately one-third to two and one-half times the Company’s revenue. We also use the peer group data to assess the competitiveness of total direct compensation awarded to our senior executives and as a data point in designing compensation plans, benefits, and perquisites.

2019 Proxy Statement

45

Executive Compensation

The Compensation Committee determined that the following companies, which comprised the peer group for 2018 compensations decisions, was the appropriate peer group for executive compensation purposes based upon the nature of their businesses, revenues, and the pool from which they recruit their executives.

Peer Group for 2018 Compensation Decisions

Abercrombie & Fitch Co.Dick’s Sporting Goods Inc.Genesco Inc.
American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.DSW Inc.L Brands, Inc.
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.The Finish Line Inc.Ross Stores, Inc.
Autozone, Inc.GameStop Corp.Signet Jewelers Limited
Bed, Bath & Beyond Inc.The Gap Inc.Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
Caleres, Inc.

One goal of the Compensation Committee is to provide competitive total compensation opportunities for the NEOs that vary with Company performance. The Compensation Committee uses the peer group benchmark information as a reference point in evaluating executive compensation, assessing the competitiveness of total direct compensation awarded to our senior executives, and designing compensation plans, benefits, and perquisites; it does not, however, attempt to match the compensation of each executive position in the Company precisely with that of an equivalent position in the peer group. In general, the Compensation Committee looks to position an executive’s total compensation at the median of comparable positions at peer companies, consistent with the Company’s revenue in relation to peer companies. The Compensation Committee also considers other factors, including performance, responsibility, experience, tenure, internal equity, and market positioning, when determining compensation.

Changes to Peer Group for 2019 Compensation Planning

During 2018, the Committee reviewed the peer group in light of merger and acquisition activity affecting certain peer companies, as well as the standing of certain peer companies in terms of revenues and market capitalization relative to the peer group criteria and determined that a refresh of the peer group based on a revised set of criteria was appropriate. For 2019 compensation decisions, the peer group criteria is as follows: (i) companies having revenues of approximately 0.5 to 2 times the Company’s revenue and market capitalization of approximately 0.25 to 4 times the Company’s market capitalization; and (ii) select sub-industries within the consumer discretionary sector most comparable to the Company’s business-apparelbusiness, including apparel retail; apparel, accessories, and luxury goods; footwear; home furnishing retail; internet and direct marketing retail; and specialty stores. Based onWe also use the updated criteria,peer group data to assess the competitiveness of total direct compensation awarded to our senior executives and as a data point in designing compensation plans, benefits, and perquisites.

The Human Capital Committee determined that the following companies, which comprised the peer group for 20192021 compensation decisions, were appropriate for executive compensation purposes based upon the nature of their businesses, revenues, and the pool from which they recruit their executives.

PEER GROUP
FOR 2021
COMPENSATION
DECISIONS
American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.Hanesbrands Inc.Tapestry, Inc.
Bath and Body Works, Inc.The Michaels Companies, Inc.Tiffany & Co.
f/k/a L Brands, Inc.PVH Corp.Tractor Supply Company
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.Qurate Retail, Inc.Ulta Beauty, Inc.
Burlington Stores, Inc.Ralph Lauren CorporationUnder Armour, Inc.
Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc.Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.Urban Outfitters, Inc.
Expedia Group, Inc.Signet Jewelers LimitedWayfair Inc.
The Gap, Inc.Skechers USA, Inc.Williams Sonoma, Inc.

One goal of the Human Capital Committee is to provide competitive total compensation opportunities for the NEOs that vary with Company performance. The Human Capital Committee uses the peer group benchmark information as a reference point in evaluating executive compensation, assessing the competitiveness of total direct compensation awarded to our senior executives, and designing compensation plans, benefits, and perquisites. It does not, however, attempt to match the compensation of each executive position in the Company precisely with that of an equivalent position in the peer group. In general, the Human Capital Committee looks to position an executive’s total compensation at the median of comparable positions at peer companies, consistent with the Company’s revenue in relation to peer companies. The Human Capital Committee also considers other factors, including performance, responsibility, experience, tenure, internal equity, and market positioning, when determining compensation.

2022 Proxy Statement

65

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

During 2018, the Human Capital Committee developed the criteria for determining the Company’s peer group. At that time, the Human Capital Committee endeavored to refresh the peer group every three years, with annual adjustments limited to merger and acquisition activity or going private transactions. To that goal, in 2021, the Human Capital Committee reviewed the criteria established in 2018 and determined that it was still appropriate. Based on this criteria and the companies’ 2021 revenues and market capitalizations, the peer group for 2022 compensation planning which is shownwas refreshed, as provided below, reflectsto reflect a larger and more diverse group of peers:

 

(GRAPHIC) DeletionsDELETIONS(GRAPHIC) AdditionsPeer Group for 2019 Compensation Planning
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.Burlington Stores, Inc.American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.Ralph Lauren Corp.
Ascena RetailExpedia Group, Inc.Expedia, Inc.Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.
Autozone, Inc.Hanesbrands, Inc.Burlington Stores, Inc.Signet Jewelers Ltd.
Caleres, Inc.Michaels Companies, Inc.Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc.Skechers USA, Inc.
DSW Inc. (GRAPHIC)PVH Corp. (GRAPHIC)Expedia, Inc.Tapestry, Inc.
The Finish Line Inc.Qurate Retail, Inc.The Gap, Inc.Tiffany & Co.
GameStop Corp.Ralph Lauren Corp.Hanesbrands, Inc.Tractor Supply Co.
Genesco Inc.Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.L Brands, Inc.Ulta Beauty, Inc.
Ross Stores, Inc.Skechers USA, Inc.Michaels Companies, Inc.Under Armour, Inc.
Williams Sonoma, Inc.Tapestry, Inc.PVH Corp.Urban Outfitters, Inc.
Tiffany & Co.Qurate Retail, Inc.Wayfair Inc.
Tractor Supply Co.
Ulta Beauty,The Michaels Companies, Inc.    
ADDITIONSAcademy Sports andLevi Strauss & Co.Petco Health and Wellness
Outdoors, Inc.The ODP CorporationCompany, Inc.
Capri Holdings Limited  
PEER GROUP
FOR 2022
COMPENSATION
DECISIONS
Academy Sports andThe Gap Inc.Signet Jewelers Limited
Outdoors, Inc.Hanesbrands, Inc.Skechers USA, Inc.
American EagleLevi Strauss & Co.Tapestry, Inc.
Outfitters, Inc.The ODP CorporationTractor Supply Co.
Bath and Body Works,Petco Health andUlta Beauty, Inc.
Inc. f/k/a L Brands, Inc.Wellness Company, Inc.Under Armour, Inc.
Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.PVH Corp.Urban Outfitters, Inc.
Burlington Stores, Inc.

Qurate Retail, Inc.

Williams Sonoma, Inc.
 Capri Holdings LimitedRalph Lauren Corp.  
 Urban Outfitters,Dick’s Sporting Goods Inc.
Wayfair,Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.  
       

 

46

Foot Locker, Inc.

Executive Compensation

Use of Compensation ConsultantsUSE OF COMPENSATION CONSULTANTS

 

The CompensationHuman Capital Committee has retained as its advisorCAP, a nationally-recognized executive compensation consultant Compensation Advisory Partners (“CAP”), that is independent and performs no work for management.management, as its advisor. CAP reports directly to the CompensationHuman Capital Committee, meets with the Human Capital Committee privately without management present, and regularly communicates privately with the Human Capital Committee Chair. CAP also meets with the Nominating and GovernanceResponsibility Committee regarding non-employee directors’ compensation and reports on related governance and trends. The CompensationHuman Capital Committee has assessed the independence of CAP based on standards promulgated by the SEC and concluded that no conflict of interest exists that would prevent it from serving as an independent consultant to the Human Capital Committee. Each year, CAP reviews a report on risk in relation to the Company’s compensation policies and practices, provides a pay-for-performance analysis of our executive compensation program, and reviews the CEO’s compensation. In addition, each year CAP reviews and makes recommendations regarding the compensation program for non-employee directors, and the CompensationHuman Capital Committee considers the consultant’sCAP’s report on the program. Management utilizesIn 2021, management utilized the services of ClearBridge Compensation Group, a nationally-recognized compensation consultant, to provide advice on the executive compensation program and plan design.

 

Management Involvement in Developing the Compensation ProgramMANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT IN DEVELOPING THE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

 

Management is involved in various aspects of developing the executive compensation program. Our Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer, Vice President—Global TotalPresident-Total Rewards, and staff in the Human Resources Department work with our CEO to develop compensation recommendations for all corporate and executive officers other than the CEO. The CEO or the Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer reviews these proposals with the CompensationHuman Capital Committee Chair, and may make changes to the recommendations based upon her input, before the recommendations are presented to the CompensationHuman Capital Committee for review. As part of her responsibilities, the Lead Independent Director also attends all Human Capital Committee meetings and advises the Human Capital Committee Chair in fulfilling her designated role and responsibilities. Our Senior Vice President and General Counsel also attends meetings of the CompensationHuman Capital Committee and participates in some of these discussions and preparations.

 

66

    Foot Locker, Inc.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Additional InformationADDITIONAL INFORMATION

 

Key Compensation Governance PoliciesKEY COMPENSATION GOVERNANCE POLICIES

 

Independent Compensation Consultant
WHAT WE DOWHAT WE DO NOT DO

    Align executive pay closely with Company’s performance and strategy

    Set rigorous and objective performance goals

    Maintain a clawback policy

    Impose and monitor meaningful stock ownership guidelines

    Require a one-year time-based vesting period for earned PSU payouts following attainment of performance goals

    Include double-trigger change in control provisions in employment agreements and equity awards

    Mitigate undue risk in compensation programs

    Retain independent compensation consultant to advise the Human Capital Committee

    Hold annual “Say-on-Pay” advisory vote

    Conduct shareholder engagement outreach to regularly obtain feedback on compensation and other topics

     No changes to in-flight performance cycles

     No tax gross-up for any compensation, benefit, perquisite, or change in control payments (other than the IAP and relocation program that is available to all employees)

     No hedging or pledging of the Company’s stock

     No repricing of stock options without shareholder approval

     No stock options granted below fair market value

     No dividends or dividend equivalents on RSUs or PSUs

     No excessive severance benefits

 

With regard to executive and director compensation matters, our Compensation Committee directly retains, and is advised by, an independent compensation consultant who performs no other work for the Company.

Clawback Policy

CLAWBACK POLICY

We have adopted a clawback policy that provides for the recovery of incentive compensation—compensation paid in cash or equity—equity if the CompensationHuman Capital Committee determines that an executivethe participant (1) engaged in fraud or gross misconduct which results in an accounting adjustment, whether or not the adjustment results in a restatement of our financial statements, or (2) committed a significant legal or compliance violation of the Company’s policies or Code of Business Conduct.Conduct or other policies. The CompensationHuman Capital Committee is closely monitoring the proposed SEC rules regarding recoupment of incentive-based compensation, and will amend theour policy if necessary when the final rules are adopted.as necessary.

 

Stock Ownership Guidelines

STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES

We have meaningful stock ownership guidelines for our senior executives. These are set at six times annual base salary for the CEO, three times annual base salary for executive vice presidents, two times annual base salary for senior vice presidents, and a multiple of annual base salary for other covered executives. If an executive has not met the ownership requirements following a five-year phase-in period, the executive is required to hold 100% of net shares acquired from the vesting of restricted stock or RSUs or the exercise of stock options until they comply with the stock ownership guidelines. At the end of 2018,2021, all of the NEOs met or exceeded their applicable ownership guidelines.

No Tax Gross-Ups

We do not provide a tax gross-up with regard to any compensation, benefit, or perquisite paid by the Company, other than our international assignment policy (“IAP”) or relocation program that is applicable to all employees. We also do not provide tax gross-ups for any amount paid to an executive upon termination of employment or in connection with a change in control.

2019 Proxy Statement

47

Executive Compensation

Anti-Hedging Policy

We do not permit our executives to take short positions in our shares or to hedge their economic interest in their shares.

No Stock Option Repricing

Our Stock Incentive Plan does not permit the repricing of stock options without shareholder approval. These guidelines are described on page 32.

 

Compensation Plans and RiskCOMPENSATION PROGRAM AND RISK

 

We believe that our compensation program encourages our NEOs to take action to improve the Company’s performance without encouraging them to take undue risk. The performance-based annual cash incentiveAnnual Incentive Plan and LTIP elements of the programPSU awards are paid based upon performance as compared to the Company’s annual and two-year financial plans, respectively, which are prepared each year by the Company’s management, and reviewed and approved by the Finance Committee, and the Board. The AFG awards are based on the approved 2018-19 financial plan and 2020 forecast reviewed by the Finance Committee and the Board. No incentive awards are earned or paid unless the applicable performance goals are achieved. We believe that, on balance, the plans are rigorous, but reasonably achievable under normal business conditions. This encourages our executives to manage the business well without pressuring them to take undue risks in order to obtain a payout.

 

Our equity-based compensationLTI awards for the NEOs isare designed with a similar goal in mind. We believe that our equity grantsLTI awards are reasonable in relation to overall compensation. Stock options normally vest ratably over a three-year period and have a 10-year term, and RSUs cliff vest generally after a period of three years, thereby each reducing the risk that an executive will take short-term action to inflate the price of the Company’s stock for a brief period.

LTIP PSU payouts are calculated at the conclusion of a two-year performance period, but are not actually paid to the participant until after an additional year of vesting has been satisfied. In addition to serving as a retention vehicle, this also requires that the executive continuecontinues to have the value of the stock portion of his or hertheir award at risk and dependent on fluctuations in stock price, for an additional year. It also allows a year to pass in which any issues concerning the Company’s operating or financial performance may come to light before payments are made.

2022 Proxy Statement

67

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

In addition, there are certain other factors related to our compensation programs for the NEOs that we believe help reduce the likelihood that our compensation programs will encourage our executives to take undue risk, as described below. See page 50 for a discussion of compensation and risk in our compensation plans more generally, and the procedures we followed to evaluate risk.

 

FactorDescription
ROIC as Bonus
PSU Award Measurement
As a retail company, we believe that one of the potential risks we have is that management will attempt to achieve profit targets without taking into account the capital used, particularly working capital invested in inventory and operating leases. We have, therefore, designed our LTIPPSU awards for senior management, including the NEOs, to take into account ROIC as well as net incomeTwo-Year Average After-Tax Income in determining whether a bonusPSU award payout will be paid.
No Bonus Payments to
Executives with Poor
Performance Ratings
We have designed our plans so that executives who receive a “Not Meeting Performance” rating under the Company’s annual performance appraisal process are not eligible to receive an annual bonus payment.incentive payout. This helps prevent an individual executive from taking any action inconsistent with the business plan or otherwise exposing the Company to undue risk.
Incentive Targets 
Bonus TargetsBonusAnnual Incentive Plan targets are based on the financial plan that is reviewed by the Finance Committee and approved by the Board.
Annual Incentive Payout Caps 
Incentive Payments
Proportional to
Base Salary
We believe that our cashAnnual incentive payments are not outsized in relation to base salary. Mr. Johnson, as CEO, has the opportunity to earn at target 200% of his base salary in annual bonus and 250% of his base salary in LTIP. Comparable percentages for the other NEOs currently range from 75% to 100% for annual bonus and LTIP.
Bonus CapsAnnual cash bonuspayouts to executives are capped and do not include excessive leverage.
Mix of ComponentsWe use a mix of annual and long-term incentive components, as well as a mix between the use of cash and equity.

 

48

    Foot Locker, Inc.

Executive Compensation

Delegation of AuthorityDELEGATION OF AUTHORITY

 

The CompensationHuman Capital Committee currently has delegated authority to its Chair to approve, between committee meetings, time-vested RSU awards up to 7,500 RSUs per individual award and stock option awards up to 25,000 shares per individual award, in both cases only to executives who are not corporate or executive officers of the Company, division chief executive officers, or general managers. It is expected that the Chair would use this authority to approve awards made during the course of the year in connection with promotions, new hires, or special retention purposes. Options are priced at fair market value on the date the Chair signs the approval, which is the grant date for awards made under this delegation authority. Similarly, the value of RSU awards is based on the fair market value on the date the Chair signs the approval. The Chair used this authority three times in 2018, approving stock options and time-based RSU awards.twice during 2021. The CompensationHuman Capital Committee has not delegated authority to management to make stock option, restricted stock, RSU, or other equity-based awards.

 

Items Disregarded for Bonus Calculations

Annual Bonus and LTIP payments are formula-driven based upon Company performance, and our 2018 program for the NEOs does not provide for discretionary adjustments based upon individual performance. The Compensation Committee may, however, in its sole discretion, determine to eliminate or reduce the amounts payable under these incentive programs, but has no discretion to increase Annual Bonus or LTIP payments. When establishing the targets, the Compensation Committee normally specifies certain items that it considers to be unusual or non-recurring, and these events, if they occur, are excluded when calculating payments. All of the references in this CD&A to target and actual performance levels refer to amounts after taking these adjustments into consideration.

Accounting and Tax Considerations of Executive CompensationACCOUNTING AND TAX CONSIDERATIONS

 

While we review both the accounting and tax effects of various components of compensation, these effects are not a significant factor in the CompensationHuman Capital Committee’s allocation of compensation among the different components. With respect to awards made before the 2017 tax reform legislation, it was the Committee’s intent that compensation paid to executive officers should generally be deductible for U.S. tax purposes, and, consistent with this intent, the Committee structured our bonus, long-term incentive, and stock option programs so that payments made under them generally qualified for the performance-based exception of Section 162(m) of the IRC (“Section 162(m)”). However, theThe Human Capital Committee believes that in certain instances it is in the Company’sbest interests of the Company and our shareholders’ best interestsshareholders to have the flexibility to pay compensation that is not tax deductible so that we may provide compensation consistent with our program and objectives.

 

2022 COMPENSATION PROGRAM DESIGN CHANGES

In March 2022, the Human Capital Committee established the performance goals under the Annual Incentive Plan for the 2022 fiscal year and PSU awards for the performance period beginning in 2022. Under the Annual Incentive Plan, the goals are based (a) 80% on Adjusted Pre-Tax Income, and (b) 20% on NPS. Under the PSU awards, the preliminary goals are based (a) 70% on Two-Year Average After-Tax Income, and (b) 30% on Two-Year Average ROIC. The 2017 U.S. Tax Reform Legislation amended Section 162(m)preliminary PSU payout would be adjusted by a TSR modifier, to eliminaterepresent the “performance-based compensation” exception effectiveCompany’s TSR percent rank over a three-year performance period commencing at the beginning of the 2022 fiscal year relative to the companies in the S&P 1500 Specialty Retail Index, such that it is multiplied by between 75% for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, subjectTSR below the 30th percentile to a transition rule allowing companies125% for TSR above the 80th percentile. The TSR modifier is designed to deduct compensation payable pursuant to a written binding contractenhance the alignment of internal incentive plan payouts with changes in effect on November 2, 2017 and not materially modified after that date. Notwithstandingexternal shareholder value. Additionally, recognizing the Company’s change in vendor mix and expected substantial investments in the tax law,business, the Human Capital Committee is committedreduced the maximum payouts to 150% of target from 200% in prior years for participants under the Annual Incentive Plan and PSU awards (notwithstanding the TSR modifier), respectively, to ensure alignment between management’s payouts and shareholders’ expectations if the target goals are exceeded. The Human Capital Committee believes that the introduction of a TSR modifier to the principles of linking executive pay closely toPSU awards and a reduction in the maximum payouts under the Annual Incentive Plan and PSU awards are appropriate in a year in which all parties–management and shareholders–are making important investments in our Company’s strategy and performance, establishing challenging and measurable performance goals, and providing payout limits under annual and long-term incentive plans. Further, the Compensation Committee reserves the right to modify compensation that was initially intended to be exempt from Section 162(m) if it determines that such modifications are consistent with the Company’s business needs.future.

 

68

2019 Proxy Statement    Foot Locker, Inc.

49

 

 

 

Executive CompensationEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Compensation Committee ReportHUMAN CAPITAL COMMITTEE REPORT

 

The CompensationHuman Capital Committee has reviewed and discussed the CD&A with management and, based on that review and discussion, has recommended to the Board that the CD&A be included in this Proxy Statement.

 

Members of the Compensation CommitteeMEMBERS OF THE HUMAN CAPITAL COMMITTEE

 

 (GRAPHIC)(GRAPHIC) (GRAPHIC) (GRAPHIC)
 (GRAPHIC) 
Kimberly Underhill, KIMBERLYALAN D.GUILLERMO G.DARLENE
UNDERHILLFELDMANMARMOLNICOSIA
ChairMaxine ClarkMemberAlan D. FeldmanMemberSteven OaklandCheryl Nido TurpinMember

 

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider ParticipationHUMAN CAPITAL COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

 

Maxine Clark, Alan D.Ms. Underhill, Mr. Feldman, Steven Oakland, Cheryl Nido Turpin,Mr. Marmol, and Kimberly UnderhillMs. Nicosia served on the CompensationHuman Capital Committee during 2018.2021. In addition, Ms. Clark served on the Human Capital Committee during 2021 prior to her retirement in May 2021. None of the committee members was an officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, and there were no interlocks with other companies within the meaning of the SEC’s proxy rules.

 

Compensation and RiskCOMPENSATION AND RISK

 

The Company has completed a risk-related review and assessment of our compensation program and concluded that our compensation policies and practices, including executive compensation, isare not reasonably likely to result in a material adverse effect on the Company. As part of this review, the independent compensation consultant to the CompensationHuman Capital Committee reviewed risk in relation to the Company’s compensation policies and practices with the Company’s human resources executives directly involved in compensation matters. The consultant reviewed the compensation policies and practices in effect for corporate and division employeesteam members through the manager level, store managers, and store associates,team members, and reviewed the features we have built into the compensation programs to discourage excessive risk taking by employees,team members, including a balance between different elements of compensation, differing time periods for different elements, consistent Company-wide programs, plan performance targets based on the corporate budgeting process, and stock ownership guidelines for senior management.guidelines.

 

2022 Proxy Statement

5069

    Foot Locker, Inc.

 

 

 

This page intentionally left blank.

Executive CompensationEXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONExecutive CompensationEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

 

Summary Compensation Table

(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f) (g) (h)(i)
  Salary Stock
Awards
 Option
Awards
 Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Compensation
 Change inPension Value
and Non-Qualified Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
  All Other
Compensation
Total
Name and Principal PositionYear($)(1)($)(2)(3) ($)(2)($)(4) ($)(5) ($)(6) ($)
Richard A. Johnson20181,100,0008,875,0691,124,9991,859,000 380,307 62,60113,401,976
Chairman, President and20171,100,0002,750,0612,200,005 294,161 48,9956,393,222
ChiefExecutive Officer20161,087,5002,062,5222,200,0162,599,932 403,443 572,4558,925,868
Lauren B. Peters2018675,0001,925,101250,001427,781 182,072 13,4043,473,359
ExecutiveVice President and2017675,000506,314500,009 174,281 7,6461,863,250
Chief Financial Officer2016657,5001,579,759450,010714,088 205,626 84,0113,690,994
Stephen D.“Jake” Jacobs2018850,0002,600,048250,0011,336,200 246,502 23,9805,306,731
ExecutiveVice President and2017850,000637,554500,009 179,511 32,9242,199,998
ChiefExecutive Officer—North America2016844,4452,654,792450,010952,238 222,934 117,5135,241,932
LewisP.Kimble2018650,0001,712,620225,005 247,830 1,314,6034,150,058
ExecutiveVice President and2017650,000365,679450,013 263,152 386,6412,115,485
ChiefExecutive Officer—AsiaPacific2016642,4601,365,680450,010635,262 326,186 235,9703,655,568
PawanVerma2018550,0001,312,563150,003348,562 90,599 42,5142,494,241
ExecutiveVicePresident and2017493,3331,785,721225,006 49,737 43,8552,597,652
ChiefInformationandCustomer Connectivity Officer2016461,250261,603225,005360,252 70,795 239,9281,618,833

(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)(i)(j)
Name and Principal PositionYearSalary
($)(1)
Bonus
($)(2)
Stock
Awards

($)(3)(4)

Option

Awards
($)(3)

Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Compensation
($)(1)(5)
Change in Pension Value
and Non-Qualified Deferred
Compensation Earnings
($)(6)
All Other
Compensation
($)(7)
Total
($)
Richard A. Johnson
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
20211,150,0006,440,0631,610,0124,169,9001,038,04450,30614,458,325
2020996,6674,937,5181,200,0023,847,900880,58278,65111,941,320
20191,137,5004,937,5211,200,0041,378,650521,58846,9429,222,205
Andrew E. Page
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
2021496,193500,0001,656,881184,503675,87021,0483,534,495
         
         
Franklin R. Bracken
Executive Vice President and
Chief Operating Officer
2021643,5421,396,860199,212943,273231,3013,414,188
         
         
W. Scott Martin
Executive Vice President,
Chief Strategy and Corporate
Development Officer
2021611,250979,079199,212856,032161,91879,9632,887,454
2020538,659641,277200,000549,398133,36464,4292,127,127
2019518,750612,563200,015204,33663,35424,6221,623,640(8)
Andrew I. Gray
Executive Vice President and
Chief Commercial Officer
2021611,2501,079,089194,763831,27381,94462,0342,860,353
2020512,663419,34975,002613,69560,216202,416(8)1,883,341(8)
Lauren B. Peters(9)
Former Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
2021175,00070,762245,762
2020653,333673,111250,002878,325384,22181,3012,920,293
2019693,750950,053250,006315,309298,36418,4552,525,937
Vijay Talwar(10)
Former Executive Vice President
and Chief Executive Officer—EMEA
2021576,920808,332202,0712,296,3353,883,658
2020606,667737,544250,002780,000170,661265,480(8)2,810,354(8)
2019650,000737,575250,00668,966790,303(8)2,496,850(8)

 

Notes to Summary Compensation Table

(1)The amounts in columns (c) and (f)(g) reflect the annual base salaries and non-equity incentive plan compensation, respectively, earned by our NEOs for the designated years. For 2018,2021, these combined amounts represented the following percentagepercentages of the NEOs’ total compensation: Mr. Johnson (22.1%(36.8%), Mr. Page (33.2%), Mr. Bracken (46.5%), Mr. Martin (50.8%), Mr. Gray (50.4%), Ms. Peters (31.7%), Mr. Jacobs (41.2%), Mr. Kimble (15.7%(71.2%), and Mr. Verma (36.0%Talwar (14.9%). Information on the NEOs’ employment agreements, as applicable, appears beginning on page 54.72.

(2)The amount in column (d) reflects the sign-on bonus that Mr. Page received in connection with the commencement of his employment in April 2021.

(3)The amounts reflected in these columns (e) and (f) reflect the stock and option awards granted in the designated years. The amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the awards granted in each respective year calculatedcomputed in accordance with stock-based compensation accounting rules. A discussion of the assumptions used in computing the award values may be found in Note 21 to our financial statements in our 2018 Annual Report, on Form 10-K.which is available at investors.footlocker-inc.com/ar. As provided under the SEC’s rules, the amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions and include, for restricted stock awards, expected dividend payments at the same rate as paid on our shares of Common Stock.conditions. See the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table in Fiscal 2021 beginning on page 5674 for additional information on awards granted in 2018.2021. The amounts shown in the table do not necessarily reflect the actual value that may be recognized by the NEOs.

(3)(4)The amounts in this column (e) include the grant date fair value of PBRSUsPSU awards granted for the 2021-22, 2020-21, and 2019-20 long-term performance measurement periods, of 2018-19, 2017-18, and 2016-17, valued at grant date based upon the probable outcome of meeting the performance conditions, which is based on the target performance level. The amounts are consistent with the estimates of the aggregate compensation cost to be recognized over the service period determined at the grant date under stock-based compensation accounting rules, and exclude the effect of estimated forfeitures. Assuming the maximum performance level, the grant date fair value of the PBRSUsPSU awards granted for the 2021-22 long-term performance measurement period of 2018-19 would be $5,500,014$9,660,040 for Mr. Johnson, $1,350,027 for Ms. Peters, $1,700,028Johnson; $999,044 for Mr. Jacobs, $975,040Page; $1,195,289 for Mr. Kimble, and $825,027Bracken; $1,168,537 for Mr. Verma.Martin; $1,168,537 for Mr. Gray; and $1,212,390 for Mr. Talwar. This column also includes restricted stock or time-based RSU awards, where applicable. See the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table in Fiscal 2021 beginning on page 5674 for additional information on the awards granted in 2018.2021.

(4)For 2018, this column reflects the cash incentive payouts made in 2019 under the Annual Bonus Plan for 2018, as shown in Table I below. No LTIP payouts were earned for the 2017-18 performance measurement period. For 2017, there were no cash incentive payouts made under the Annual Bonus Plan for 2017 and no LTIP payouts were earned for the 2016-17 performance measurement period. For 2016, this column reflects the sum of the cash incentive payouts made in 2017 under the Annual Bonus Plan for 2016 and the cash portion of the earned LTIP payout for the 2015-16 performance measurement period that was paid in 2018, as shown in Table II below.

I—Cash Incentive Payouts for 2018

 Payout in 2019 Payout in 2020 
   LTIP 2017-18 
   Performance PeriodTotal
 Annual Bonus Plan (Cash Payout Earned—As Shown in Summary
 Cash Payment for 2018 Payable in 2020)Compensation Table
Name($) ($)($)
R. Johnson1,859,000 N/A1,859,000
L. Peters427,781 427,781
S. Jacobs1,336,200 1,336,200
L. Kimble 
P. Verma348,562 348,562

II—Cash Incentive Payouts for 2016

 Payout in 2017 Payout in 2018 
   LTIP 2015-16 
   Performance PeriodTotal
 Annual Bonus Plan (Cash Payout Earned—As Shown in Summary
 Cash Payment for 2016 Paid in 2018)Compensation Table
Name($) ($)($)
R. Johnson1,301,738 1,298,1942,599,932
L. Peters393,514 320,574714,088
S. Jacobs521,867 430,371952,238
L. Kimble318,018 317,244635,262
P. Verma184,039 176,213360,252

(5)The amounts in this column represent(g) reflect the annual changecash incentive bonuses earned under the Annual Incentive Plan for the designated years, which amounts are paid to the NEO in pension value during each of our last three fiscal years. See page 62 for more informationthe following year (subject to the NEO’s employment on 2018 pension benefits.such payment date).

(6)The amounts in this column (h) represent the annual change in pension value for the designated years. See pages 87 through 88 for more information on fiscal 2021 pension benefits.

(7)The amounts in column (i) represent perquisites and other compensation attributable to the executivesNEOs for 2018,2021, valued at the incremental cost to the Company of providing them, which represents the actual cost.cost, as reflected in the table below.

 

NameAuto
Allow.
($)
Car
Service
Reimb.
($)
Med.
Expense
Reimb.
($)(A)
Accrual
for
Post-Ret.
Med.
($)
Supp.
LTD
Ins.
Prem.
($)
Univ.
Life
Ins.
Prem.
($)
Financial
Planning
($)(B)
Match
Under
401(k)
and
Excess
Savings
Plans
($)(C)
Relo.
($)(D)
Foreign
Earnings
($)(E)
Expatriate
Tax
Payments
($)(E)
Vacation
Payout
($)
Accrued
Severance
Benefits
($)
Total
($)
Johnson12,6791,1547,6705,6663,9879,00010,15050,306
Page12,4425,0001,3092,29721,048
Bracken23,2913,6874,1301,92910,45542,476145,333231,301
Martin21,3294,42613,62940,57979,963
Gray18,3044,5883,5271,8988,77510,15014,79262,034
Peters(F)1,75556,9791,87810,15070,762
Talwar(F)7,3354,1302,84510,45510,150177,685113,900269,7772,5581,697,5002,296,335

 

(A)The amounts shown reflect amounts reimbursed in 2021, which may also include reimbursements of amounts submitted in 2021 for expenses incurred in 2020.


5270

    Foot Locker, Inc.2019
2022 Proxy Statement

5371



 

 

 

 

Executive CompensationEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

The amounts shown under Universal Life Insurance Premium and Financial Planning reflect the total amounts paid, including fees.
(B)The amounts shown reflect the total amounts paid, including fees.

(C)The amounts shown reflect the Company’s matching contributions under our defined contribution plans, the 401(k) Plan and Excess Savings Plan, made to the NEO’s accounts.

(D)For Mr. Bracken, the amount shown reflects expenses in connection with his relocation to the Company’s office in Bradenton, Florida, and for Mr. Talwar, the amount shown reflects expenses in connection with his relocation to the United States upon the termination of his employment.

(E)For Mr. Gray, the amount shown reflects tax equalization payments, and U.S. and foreign tax payments net of hypothetical tax deductions, in connection with his international assignment for 2020 that were paid in 2021, and for Mr. Talwar, the amounts shown reflect expatriate compensation in connection with his role as Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer—EMEA in Vianen, The Netherlands. Under Foreign Earnings, the amount shown includes expatriate benefits and allowances for certain goods and services differential, housing, automobile costs, and tax preparation assistance in connection with his international assignment. Mr. Talwar received the majority of these benefits under the IAP, which applies to employees on international assignment and is designed to minimize any financial detriment or gain to the employee on assignment. Under Expatriate Tax Payments, the amount shown includes tax equalization payments, and U.S. and foreign tax payments net of hypothetical tax deductions, in connection with his international assignment. These payments were made under the IAP and are designed to facilitate this assignment by holding the team member responsible for the tax liabilities he would have incurred had he remained in his home country.

(F)The amounts shown reflect perquisites attributable prior to Ms. Peters and Mr. Talwar’s termination of employment. Additional information on Ms. Peters and Mr. Talwar’s termination payments is provided beginning on page 92 under Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.

 

The amounts shown under Medical Expense Reimbursement reflect amounts reimbursed in 2018, which may also include reimbursement of amounts submitted in 2018 for expenses incurred in 2017.
(8)The amounts in columns (i) and (j) are updated from the disclosure found in our 2021 Proxy Statement to include (x) the Total for Mr. Martin for 2019, and the All Other Compensation and Total for Mr. Gray for 2020, to include the Change in Pension Value and Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings, and Relocation, respectively, which values were correctly included in the Summary Compensation Table and footnote 6 thereto; and (y) the All Other Compensation and Total for Mr. Talwar for 2019 and 2020 to include additional relocation expenses of $34,186, and financial planning, relocation, foreign earnings, and expatriate tax payments of $780,389, respectively, which were updated after the filing of our 2021 Proxy Statement. Note that, although Mr. Talwar was not a NEO in 2019, the Company disclosed his 2019 compensation in the Summary Compensation Table when he first became an NEO in 2020.

The amounts shown under 401(k) Match reflect the Company’s matching contribution under the Foot Locker 401(k) Plan made to the NEO’s account.
(9)Ms. Peters ceased to serve as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer effective April 12, 2021, and departed from the Company effective May 1, 2021.

For Mr. Kimble, the amounts shown under Foreign Earnings and Expatriate Tax Payments reflect expatriate compensation for 2018 in his position as Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer—International in Vianen, The Netherlands. Under Foreign Earnings, the amount shown includes expatriate benefits and allowances for certain goods and services differential, housing, automobile costs, and tax preparation assistance in connection with his international assignment. Mr. Kimble received the majority of these benefits and allowances under the IAP, which applies to employees on international assignment and is designed to minimize any financial detriment or gain to the employee from the assignment. Under Expatriate Tax Payments, the amount shown includes tax equalization payments, and U.S. and foreign tax payments net of hypothetical tax deductions, in connection with his international assignment. These payments are made under the IAP and are designed to facilitate these assignments by holding these employees responsible for the tax liabilities they would have incurred had they remained in their home countries. The amount reported under Expatriate Tax Payments represents the sum of the actual tax payments and other tax items associated with his assignment less his hypothetical tax withholding.

  Car Med.Supp.   Expatriate 
 Auto.ServiceUniv. LifeExpenseLTD Ins.Financial401(k)ForeignTax 
 Allow.Reimb.Ins. Prem.Reimb.Prem.PlanningMatchEarningsPaymentsTotal
Name($)($)($)($)($)($)($)($)($)($)
R. Johnson4,84528,8724,9276,9333,66210,6122,75062,601
L. Peters3,9632,7633,9282,75013,404
S. Jacobs15,9755,2552,75023,980
L. Kimble3,58176614,2431,296,0131,314,603
P. Verma18,1612,8704,7783,31413,39142,514
(10)Mr. Talwar ceased to serve as Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer—EMEA effective November 17, 2021, and departed from the Company effective December 16, 2021, under circumstances the Human Capital Committee determined constituted a termination without cause under the Company’s employment agreement with Mr. Talwar, thereby requiring the Company to pay Mr. Talwar severance benefits according to the terms of his employment agreement.

 

The Company has established a trust for certain benefit plans, arrangements, and agreements, including the SERP, the Foot Locker Excess Cash BalancePlan, the Excess Savings Plan, the executive employment agreements, and other benefit plans, agreements, or arrangements that may be covered at a later date (collectively, the “Benefit Obligations”). Upon the occurrence of a Potential Change in Control of the Company as(as defined in the trust agreement,agreement), the Company is required to fund the trust with an amount sufficient to pay the total amount of the Benefit Obligations. Following the occurrence, and during the pendency, of a Potential Change in Control, the trustee would be required to make payments of Benefit Obligations to the extent these payments are not made by the Company.

 

Employment AgreementsEMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS AND OTHER ARRANGEMENTS

 

We have employment agreements with Messrs. Johnson and Martin, and while we do not have employment agreements with Messrs. Page, Bracken, and Gray, they are each ofentitled to substantially the NEOs,same benefits, and we describesubject to substantially the same provisions, as Mr. Martin. We had employment agreements with Ms. Peters and Mr. Talwar substantially in the same form as Mr. Martin prior to their departure from the Company. The material terms of each of these agreementsarrangements are described below. Information on estimated potential payments and benefits upon termination of the agreements is described under

NameTerm End DateBase Salary
Rate(1)
($)
Two-Year
Non-Compete and
Non-Solicitation
Johnson01/31/24(2)$1,150,000(3)
PageN/A    615,000   
BrackenN/A    800,000(4)
Martin01/31/23(2)615,000   
GrayN/A    615,000   
Peters(5)05/01/21   700,000   
Talwar(6)12/16/21   665,000   

(1)These base salary rates are as of January 29, 2022 for each of the NEOs, except for Ms. Peters and Mr. Talwar, which are as of their respective termination dates.

(2)Mr. Johnson’s employment agreement is automatically extended for another year unless notice of non-renewal is given one year prior to the then-current expiration of the term. Mr. Martin’s employment agreement is automatically extended for another year unless notice of non-renewal is given three months prior to the then-current expiration of the term.

(3)During the term of the agreement, the Company will pay Mr. Johnson an annual base salary of not less than $1,000,000. See Notes 1 and 2 to the Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2021 beginning on page 74 for the 2021 payment levels at threshold, target, and maximum performance for the Annual Incentive Plan and PSU awards for Mr. Johnson. The payment levels are based on a percentage of Mr. Johnson’s base salary rate.

72

    Foot Locker, Inc.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Controlbeginning on page 65.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Richard A. Johnson

(4)Mr. Bracken served as Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer—North America until November 2021. His base salary rate was $615,000 at that time until he was promoted to Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer in November 2021.

(5)Ms. Peters ceased to serve as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer effective April 12, 2021, and departed from the Company effective May 1, 2021, at which time her employment agreement terminated. Certain obligations under her employment agreement continue post-termination, such as Ms. Peters’s non-competition obligation.

(6)Mr. Talwar ceased to serve as Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer—EMEA effective November 17, 2021, and departed from the Company effective December 16, 2021 under circumstances the Human Capital Committee determined constituted a termination without cause, at which time his employment agreement terminated. Certain obligations under his employment agreement continue post-termination, such as Mr. Talwar’s non-competition obligation.

 

Position.We have an employment agreement with Mr.Messrs. Johnson, in connection with his position as Chief Executive Officer.

Term.The term of this agreement ends on January 31, 2021. The agreement contains an “evergreen” renewal provision that provides for additional one-year renewals of the employment term, unless either party gives notice of non-renewal one year prior to the end of the then-current term.

Base SalaryPage, Bracken, Gray, and Bonus.During the term of the agreement, the Company shall pay Mr. Johnson an annual base salary of not less than $1,000,000. Mr. Johnson’s 2018 base salary rate was $1,100,000. As Chief Executive Officer, for 2018, Mr. Johnson’s annual bonus at target under the Annual Bonus Plan was 200% of his base salary, and his annual bonus at target under the LTIP was 250% of his base salary at the start of the performance period.

Benefit Plans and Perquisites.Mr. Johnson isMartin are entitled to participate in all bonus, incentive and equity plans offered to senior executives in effect at the start of their agreements and offer letters, as applicable, as well as benefits, including retirement plans, company-paid life insurance, long-term disability coverage, and reimbursement for certain medical transportation, and financial planning expenses.

Non-Compete Provision.Mr. Johnson’s agreement provides that he may not compete with the Company or solicit our employees for two years following the termination of his employment agreement.

54

    Foot Locker, Inc.

Executive Compensation

Certain Defined Terms. Mr. Johnson’s agreement includes definitions of certain terms such as “Cause” (i.e., for Mr. Johnson’s dismissal), “Good Reason” (i.e., for Mr. Johnson’s resignation), and “Change in Control” (which includes, among other things, the acquisition of 35% or more of the Company’s outstanding stock).

Other NEOs

Position/Term/Base Salary.We have substantially identical employment agreements with these executives in their current positions, as follows:

Current Base
Current TermSalary Rate
NamePositionEnd Date($)
L. PetersExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer1/31/2020675,000
S. JacobsExecutive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer—North America1/31/2020850,000
L. KimbleExecutive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer—Asia Pacific1/31/2020650,000
P. VermaExecutive Vice President and Chief Information and Customer Connectivity Officer1/31/2020550,000

The terms of the agreements will automatically be extended for another year unless notice of non-renewal is given by the October 31 prior to the then-current expiration of the term. We pay these executives annual base salaries at rates not less than their salaries at the start of their agreements. The executives’ base salaries for 2018 are shown in the table above.

Benefit Plans and Perquisites. These executives are entitled to participate in all benefit plans and arrangements in effect at the start of the agreement, including retirement plans, Annual Bonus Plan, LTIP, medical, dental, and disability plans,expenses, and any other plans subsequently offered to our senior executives.

 

Non-Compete Provision.The executives’ agreements provide that they may not compete with the Company or solicit our employees for two years following the termination of their employment agreements.

Certain Defined Terms. The executives’ agreementsand offer letters, as applicable, include definitions of certain terms such as “Cause” (i.e., fordismissal) by the executive’s dismissal),company under certain circumstances, “Good Reason” (i.e., for the executive’s resignation)resignation under certain circumstances), “Change in Control” (which includes, among other things,(e.g., the acquisition of 35% or more of the Company’s outstanding stock), and “Disability.”

 

Information on estimated potential payments and benefits upon termination of the NEOs’ employment or upon a change in control is described under Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control beginning on page 92.

 2019 2022 Proxy Statement

5573

 

 

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Executive Compensation

 

Grants of Plan-Based Awards TableGRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS IN FISCAL 2021

 

The following table shows the awards made to the NEOs in 2018 under the Annual Bonus Plan and the LTIP, as well as the AFG awards and RSU and stock option awards under the Stock Incentive Plan:2021:

 

      Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards
        
(a)   (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) (k) (l)
Name Award Type Grant Date Threshold ($) Target
($)
 Maximum ($) Threshold (#) Target
(#)
 Maximum (#) All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units
(#)
 All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities Underlying
Options
(#)
 Exercise or
Base Price of
Option Awards
($/Sh)
 Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and Option
Awards
($)(5)
Johnson Annual Incentive 03/24/21(1) 575,000 2,300,000 4,600,000              
  PSU 03/24/21(2)       22,524 90,096 180,191       4,830,047
  Stock Option 03/24/21(3)               79,971 53.61 1,609,816
  RSU 03/24/21(4)            30,032    1,610,016
Page Annual Incentive 04/12/21(1) 93,198 372,791 745,582              
  PSU 04/12/21(2)       933 3,730 7,460       222,793
  PSU 04/12/21(2)       2,091 8,363 16,726       499,522
  Stock Option 04/13/21(3)               8,333 58.25 184,493
  RSU 04/12/21(4)             12,557     750,030
  RSU 04/13/21(4)             3,168     184,536
Bracken Annual Incentive 03/24/21(1) 131,349 525,398 1,050,795              
  PSU 03/24/21(2)       2,787 11,148 22,296       597,643
  Stock Option 03/24/21(3)               9,895 53.61 199,186
  RSU 03/24/21(4)             3,716     199,215
  RSU 11/16/21(4)             10,661     600,001
Martin Annual Incentive 03/24/21(1) 114,627 458,507 917,014              
  PSU 03/24/21(2)       2,725 10,899 21,797       584,295
  Stock Option 03/24/21(3)               9,674 53.61 194,738
  RSU 03/24/21(4)             3,633     194,765
  RSU 11/16/21(4)             3,554     200,019
Gray Annual Incentive 03/24/21(1) 114,627 458,507 917,014              
  PSU 03/24/21(2)       2,725 10,899 21,797       584,295
  Stock Option 03/24/21(3)               9,674 53.61 194,738
  RSU 03/24/21(4)             3,633     194,765
  RSU 11/16/21(4)             5,331     300,029
Talwar PSU 03/24/21(2)       2,827 11,308 22,615       606,222
  Stock Option 03/24/21(3)               10,037 53.61 202,045
  RSU 03/24/21(4)             3,770     202,110

  Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
 Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
    
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e) (f)(g)(h)(i)( j)(k)(l)
NameGrant DateThreshold
($)
Target
($)
Maximum
($)
 Threshold
(#)
Target
(#)
Maximum
(#)
All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares
of Stock
or Units
(#)
All
Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)
Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
Grant
Date
Fair
Value of
Stock
and
Option
Awards
($)(6)
R. Johnson03/28/18(1)550,0002,200,0004,400,000        
 03/28/18(2)    15,35361,412122,823   2,750,029
 04/12/18(3)    27,216108,862217,723   5,000,032
 03/28/18(4)        91,09344.781,124,999
 03/28/18(5)       25,123  1,125,008
L. Peters03/28/18(1)126,563506,2501,012,500        
 03/28/18(2)    3,76915,07430,148   675,014
 04/12/18(3)    4,08316,33032,659   750,037
 04/12/18(3)       5,444  250,043
 03/28/18(4)        20,24344.78250,001
 03/28/18(5)       5,583  250,007
S. Jacobs03/28/18(1)212,500850,0001,700,000        
 03/28/18(2)    4,74618,98237,964   850,014
 04/12/18(3)    6,12424,49448,988  1,125,009
 04/12/18(3)       8,165  375,018
 03/28/18(4)        20,24344.78250,001
 03/28/18(5)       5,583  250,007
L. Kimble03/28/18(1)121,875487,500975,000        
 03/28/18(2)    2,72210,88721,774   487,520
 04/12/18(3)    4,08316,33032,659   750,037
 04/12/18(3)       5,444  250,043
 03/28/18(4)        18,21944.78225,005
 03/28/18(5)       5,025  225,020
P. Verma03/28/18(1)68,750275,000481,250        
 03/28/18(2)    2,3039,21218,424   412,513
 04/12/18(3)    3,06212,24724,494   562,505
 04/12/18(3)       4,083  187,532
 03/28/18(4)        12,14644.78150,003
 03/28/18(5)       3,350  150,013

74

    Foot Locker, Inc.
2022 Proxy Statement

75



 

Notes to Grants of Plan-Based Awards TableEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

(1)Annual Incentive Awards

 

Amounts shownThe amounts in columns (c), (d), and (e) reflect the payment levels at threshold, target, and maximum performance for the 20182021 fiscal year under the Annual BonusIncentive Plan and reflect the potential amounts that wouldto be paid at the end of the period if the applicable performance goals wereare achieved. The estimated bonusannual incentive payouts are based on a percentage of the executive’sNEO’s base salary rate, as shown in the table below:

 

NameThresholdTargetMaximum
R. Johnson50%200%400%
L. Peters, L. Kimble and P. Verma18.75%75%150%
S. Jacobs25%100%200%
 ThresholdTargetMaximum
Name(%)(%)(%)
Johnson50200400
Page(A), Martin, and Gray18.7575150
Bracken(B)18.7575150
 25100200

 

56

    Foot Locker, Inc.(A)Mr. Page joined the Company as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in April 2021. His target Annual Incentive Award was prorated for the 2021 performance period.

(B)Mr. Bracken served as Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer–North America until November 2021. His target award was set at 75% of his base salary rate at that time. Mr. Bracken was promoted to Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer in November 2021. His target award was set at 100% of his base salary rate at that time. His target Annual Incentive Award was prorated for the 2021 performance period.

 

Executive Compensation

The annual bonus payments actually madeAlthough Ms. Peters and Mr. Talwar participated in the Annual Incentive Plan in 2021, they were not eligible to receive a payment under the plan because their employment terminated prior to the NEOs for 2018 are shown in Note 4 tocompletion of the Summary Compensation Table on page 53.plan year.

 

(2)LTIPPSU Awards

 

ProvidedFor Mr. Page, provided the performance goals for the 2018-192020-21 long-term performance measurement period are achieved, the payout structure of the executives’ awards is as follows: (a) 100% of the award would be payable in RSUs, and (b) the payoutPSUs would be subject to a time-based, one-year vesting period following the end of the performance measurement period before payout to the executives.period. Columns (f), (g), and (h) showreflect the number of RSUsPSUs that would be paid out at threshold, target, and maximum performance if the applicable performance goals are achieved for the 2018-192020-21 performance measurement period.

The threshold, target, and maximum number of RSUs for each executive was calculated on the grant date on the basis of that day’s closing stock price of a share of Common Stock. The closing price on the grant date of March 28, 2018 for each of the NEOs was $44.78. Similarly, the grant date fair value of the RSU awards are based on the closing stock price on this grant date. The actual number of RSUs paid out will be based on the Company’s performance compared to targets. The value of the RSUs received by an executive will depend upon the Company’s stock price on the payment date in 2021. No dividends are paid or accrued for the RSUs.

The aggregate payout in stock at threshold, target, and maximum performance for each of the NEOs is based on a percentage of the executive’s base salary in the first year of the performance period, adjusted for promotion-related salary increases. The percent of base salary for each executive at threshold, target, and maximum performance is shown in the table below:

NameThresholdTargetMaximum
R. Johnson62.5%250%500%
L. Peters and S. Jacobs25%100%200%
L. Kimble and P. Verma18.75%75%150%

No amounts would be paid to the executives under the LTIP awards unless the performance goals for the performance measurement period are achieved.

(3)AFG Awards

The AFG Award is a special long-term incentive equity award covering a three-year performance period—2018-20. The payout structure of the executives’ awards is as follows: (a)PSUs for Mr. Johnson, 100% of the award is in the form of PBRSUs, and he would earn a payout following the end of the performance period only if the performance goals are achieved, and (b) for the other NEOs, 75% of the award is in the form of PBRSUs and 25% is in the form of time-based RSUs, payable following the end of the performance period, subject to the achievement of the performance goals with regard to the PBRSUs.

The threshold, target, and maximum number of RSUs for each executive wasPage were calculated on the grant date on the basis of that day’s closing stock price of a share of Common Stock. The closing price on the grant date of April 12, 20182021 for each of the NEOsMr. Page was $45.93.$59.73. Similarly, the grant date fair value of the RSU awardsPSUs are based on the closing stock price on thisthe associated grant date. The actual number of RSUsPSUs paid out will be based on the Company’s performance compared to targets. The value of the RSUsPSUs received by an executiveMr. Page will depend upon the Company’s stock price on the payment date in 2021.2023. No dividends are paid or accrued forin connection with the RSUs.

PSUs. The percentage of achievement of the performance goals at the end of the performance period will be applied to the target number of PBRSUs granted to each of the executives to determine the actual number of PBRSUs that may be earned. If the threshold performance goals are not met, no PBRSUs will be earned or paid out to any executive.

The amounts shownaggregate payout in the table below reflect the estimated payment levelsstock at threshold, target, and maximum performance for Mr. Page is based on a percentage of his base salary rate in the 2018-20second year of the performance measurement period. The PSU award values for the 2020-21 performance period for Mr. Page at threshold, target, and maximum performance are listed in the following table:

 

 ThresholdTargetMaximum
Name($)($)($)
R. Johnson1,250,0005,000,00010,000,000
L. Peters and L. Kimble187,500750,0001,500,000
S. Jacobs281,2501,125,0002,250,000
P. Verma140,625562,5001,125,000
 ThresholdTargetMaximum
Name($)($)($)
Page(A)55,692222,769445,537

(A)Mr. Page joined the Company as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in April 2021. His PSU award was prorated for the 2020-21 performance period.

 

The amounts shown inFor each of the table representsNEOs, provided the performance goals for the 2021-22 long-term performance period are achieved, the payout of the PSUs would be subject to a time-based, one-year vesting period following the end of the performance period. Columns (f), (g), and (h) reflect the number of time-based RSUs awarded underPSUs that would be paid out at threshold, target, and maximum performance if the Stock Incentive Planapplicable performance goals are achieved for the 2021-22 performance period. The threshold, target, and maximum number of PSUs for each NEO were calculated on the grant date on the basis of that day’s closing stock price of a share of Common Stock. The closing price on the grant date of March 24, 2021 for each of the NEOs other than Mr. Page was $53.61, and the closing price on the grant date of April 12, 2021 for Mr. Page was $59.73. Similarly, the grant date fair value of the PSUs are based on the closing stock price on the associated grant date. The awardactual number of PSUs paid out will vest accordingbe based on the Company’s performance compared to targets. The value of the schedule below, provided thatPSUs received by an NEO will depend upon the executive remains employed byCompany’s stock price on the Company through the vesting date.payment date in 2024. No dividends are paid or accrued in connection with the PSUs. The aggregate payout in stock at threshold, target, and maximum performance for RSU awards.each of the NEOs is based on a percentage of their base salary rate in the first year of the performance period. The PSU award values for the 2021-22 performance period for the NEOs at threshold, target, and maximum performance are listed in the following table:

 ThresholdTargetMaximum
Name($)($)($)
Johnson1,207,5004,830,0009,660,000
Page(A)124,880499,519999,037
Bracken149,405597,6201,195,240
Martin and Gray146,063584,2501,168,500
Talwar(B)151,543606,1731,212,346

 

Shares(A)
NameGrant Date(#)Vest Date
L. PetersMr. Page joined the Company as Executive Vice President and L. Kimble04/12/185,44403/24/21
S. Jacobs04/12/188,16503/24/21
P. Verma04/12/184,08303/24/21Chief Financial Officer in April 2021. His PSU award was prorated for the 2021-22 performance period.

 

2019 Proxy Statement    (B)

57

Mr. Talwar forfeited this PSU award in connection with the termination of his employment.

 

76

    Foot Locker, Inc.

 

 

 

Executive CompensationEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

(4)(3)Stock Option GrantsAwards

 

The amounts in column (j) reflect the number of stock options granted in 2018awarded for the 2021 fiscal year under the Stock Incentive Plan. The exercise price reflected in column (k) is equal to the closing price of a share of Common Stock on the grant date. In general, no portion of any stock option may be exercised until the first anniversary of its grant date. Vested options may be exercised for ten years following the grant date, unless the option is cancelled or exercised sooner. If the executiveNEO retires, becomes disabled, or dies while employed by the Company or one of its subsidiaries, all unexercised options that are then exercisable plusand those options that would have become exercisable on the next anniversary of the grant date will remain (or become) exercisable as of that date. Options granted in 20182021 will become exercisable upon a participant’s termination of employment on or within 24 months following a Change in Control. In general, options may remain exercisable for up to three years following a participant’s retirement or termination due to disability, and for up to one year for any other termination of employment for reasons other than cause.

 

The vesting scheduleschedules for the stock options granted to the executivesNEOs in 2018 is2021 are as follows:

 

  SharesVest Date: SharesVest Date: SharesVest Date: Shares
NameGrant Date(#) (#) (#) (#)
R. Johnson03/28/1891,09303/28/19:30,36403/28/20:30,36403/28/21:30,365
L. Peters and S. Jacobs03/28/1820,24303/28/19:6,74703/28/20:6,74803/28/21:6,748
L. Kimble03/28/1818,21903/28/19:6,07303/28/20:6,07303/28/21:6,073
P. Verma03/28/1812,14603/28/19:4,04803/28/20:4,04903/28/21:4,049
  SharesVest Date: SharesVest Date: SharesVest Date: Shares
NameGrant Date(#) (#) (#) (#)
Johnson03/24/2179,97103/24/22:26,65703/24/23:26,65703/24/24:26,657
Page04/13/218,33304/13/22:2,77704/13/23:2,77804/13/24:2,778
Bracken03/24/219,89503/24/22:3,29803/24/23:3,29803/24/24:3,299
Martin and Gray03/24/219,67403/24/22:3,22403/24/23:3,22503/24/24:3,225
Talwar03/24/2110,03703/24/22:*03/24/23:*03/24/24:*

*Unvested portion of stock option award cancelled upon termination of employment.

 

(5)(4)RSUsRSU Awards

 

The amounts shown in the table representcolumn (i) reflect the number of RSUs awarded for the 2021 fiscal year under the Stock Incentive Plan on the grant date.Plan. The awardawards will vest according to the scheduleschedules below, provided that the executiveNEO remains employed by the Company through the vesting date. No dividends are paid or accrued for RSU awards.

 

  Shares 
NameGrant Date(#)Vest Date
R. Johnson03/28/1824/2125,12330,032 03/28/2124/24
L. Peters and S. JacobsPage03/28/1804/12/215,5834,185 03/28/04/12/22
04/12/214,186 04/12/23
04/12/214,186 04/12/24
04/13/213,168 04/13/24
L. KimbleBracken03/28/1824/215,0253,716 03/28/24/24
11/16/2110,661 11/16/24
P. VermaMartin03/28/1824/213,3503,633 03/28/24/24
11/16/213,554 11/16/24
Gray03/24/213,633 03/24/24
11/16/215,331 11/16/24
Talwar03/24/213,770*03/24/24

*Mr. Talwar forfeited these RSU awards in connection with the termination of his employment.

 

(6)(5)Grant Date Fair Value

 

The amounts shown in column (l) reflect the aggregate grant date fair valuevalues of the RSU, PSU, and stock option awards granted in 2018,2021, calculated in accordance with stock-based compensation accounting rules. A discussion of the assumptions used in computing the award values are found in Note 21 to our financial statements in our 2018 Annual Report, on Form 10-K.which is available at investors.footlocker-inc.com/ar. For option awards, the value is calculated by multiplying the Black-Scholes value by the number of options granted. For RSUs, the fair value isvalues are calculated by multiplying the closing price of our Common Stock on the NYSE on the award date by the number of RSUs granted. For the PBRSUs and the performance-based portion of the AFG Awards granted under the Stock Incentive Plan, in connection with the 2018-19 and the 2018-20 performance periods, respectively,PSUs, the fair value is calculated based upon the probable outcome of meeting the performance conditions at the target performance level and multiplying the number of unitsPSUs that would be received at that level by the closing price of a share of our Common Stock on the grant date. This is consistent with the estimate of the aggregate compensation cost to be recognized over the service period determined at the grant date under stock-based compensation accounting rules. For the stock options, the values are calculated by multiplying the Black-Scholes value by the number of stock options awarded. All of these values, and corresponding grant dates, are shown in the table below.

 

     AFG
 Black-ScholesLTIPTime-BasedAFG PBRSUTime-Based
 Value for StockPBRSU AwardsRSU AwardsAwardsRSU Awards
 Options Granted onGranted onGranted onGranted onGranted on
 March 28, 2018March 28, 2018March 28, 2018April 12, 2018April 12, 2018
Name($)($)($)($)($)
R. Johnson12.3544.7844.7845.93
L. Peters12.3544.7844.7845.9345.93
S. Jacobs12.3544.7844.7845.9345.93
L. Kimble12.3544.7844.7845.9345.93
P. Verma12.3544.7844.7845.9345.93
       StockStock
 RSUsRSUsRSUsRSUsPSUsPSUsOptionsOptions
 03/24/2104/12/2104/13/2111/16/2103/24/2104/12/2103/24/2104/13/21
Name($)($)($)($)($)($)($)($)
Johnson and Talwar53.6153.6120.13
Page59.7358.2559.7322.14
Bracken, Martin, and Gray53.6156.2853.6120.13

 

Assuming the maximum performance level, the grant date fair value of the PBRSUsPSUs granted for the long-term performance measurement period of 2018-192020-21 would be $5,500,014$445,537 for Mr. Page, and for the long-term performance period of 2021-22, would be $9,660,000 for Mr. Johnson; $1,350,027 for Ms. Peters; $1,700,028$999,037 for Mr. Jacobs; $975,040Page; $1,195,240 for Mr. Kimble; and $825,027Bracken; $1,168,500 for Mr. Verma. Assuming the maximum performance level, the grant date fair value of the performance-based AFG awards would be $10,000,017Martin, $1,168,500 for Mr. Johnson; $1,500,028 for Ms. Peters; $2,250,019Gray, and $1,212,346 for Mr. Jacobs; $1,500,028 for Mr. Kimble; and $1,125,009 for Mr. Verma.Talwar.

 

2022 Proxy Statement

5877

    Foot Locker, Inc.

 

 

 

Executive Compensation

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-EndOUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL 2021 YEAR-END

 

The following table shows the number of outstanding stock options, both vested and unvested, and the number of unvested shares of restricted stockRSUs, and RSUsthe number of PSUs, both earned but unvested and unearned, held by the NEOs at the end of the 20182021 fiscal year:

 

 Option Awards Stock Awards
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f) (g)(h)(i)( j)
   Equity     EquityEquity
   Incentive     IncentiveIncentive Plan
   Plan Awards:    MarketPlan Awards:Awards: Market
 Number ofNumber ofNumber of   NumberValue ofNumber ofor Payout Value
 SecuritiesSecuritiesSecurities   of SharesShares orUnearnedof Unearned
 UnderlyingUnderlyingUnderlying   or UnitsUnits ofShares, UnitsShares, Units
 UnexercisedUnexercisedUnexercisedOption  of StockStockor Other Rightsor Other Rights
 OptionsOptionsUnearnedExerciseOption That HaveThat HaveThat Have NotThat Have Not
 (#)(#)OptionsPriceExpiration Not VestedNot VestedVestedVested
NameExercisable(1)Unexercisable(1)(#)($)Date (#)(2)($)(3)(#)(2)($)(3)
R. Johnson80,00015.1003/23/2020 
 80,00018.8403/23/2021 
 49,00030.9203/21/2022 
 47,00034.2403/28/2023 
 37,00045.0803/26/2024 
 55,00056.3512/01/2024 
 207,90062.1103/25/2025 
 92,92046,46063.7903/23/2026 
 47,06994,13872.8303/22/2027 
 91,09344.7803/28/2028 
  25,1231,383,272
  9,440519,766
  15,353845,336
  27,2161,498,513
L. Peters40,00024.7505/26/2021 
 44,00030.9203/21/2022 
 42,00034.2403/28/2023 
 34,00045.0803/26/2024 
 32,00062.1103/25/2025 
 19,0069,50463.7903/23/2026 
 10,69721,39672.8303/22/2027 
 20,24344.7803/28/2028 
  18,8121,035,789
  5,583307,400
  5,444299,747
  1,73895,694
  3,769207,521
  4,083224,810
S. Jacobs8,00034.2403/28/2023 
 12,66745.0803/26/2024 
 13,60056.3512/01/2024 
 21,00062.1103/25/2025 
 19,0069,50463.7903/23/2026 
 10,69721,39672.8303/22/2027 
 20,24344.7803/28/2028 
  23,5151,294,736
  5,583307,400
  8,165449,565
  2,189120,526
  4,746261,315
  6,124337,187
L. Kimble19,00045.0803/26/2024 
 21,00062.1103/25/2025 
 19,0069,50463.7903/23/2026 
 9,62819,25672.8303/22/2027 
 18,21944.7803/28/2028 
  15,677863,176
  5,025276,677
  5,444299,747
  1,25669,155
  2,722149,873
  4,083224,810
P. Verma11,34673.2108/10/2025 
 9,5034,75263.7903/23/2026 
 4,8149,62872.8303/22/2027 
 12,14644.7803/28/2028 
  43,0302,369,232
  3,350184,451
  4,083224,810
  2,303126,803
  89849,444
  1136,222
  573,138
  3,062168,594

    Option Awards       Stock Awards  
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j)
Name Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable(1)
(#)
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable(1)
(#)
 Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned Options
(#)
 Option
Exercise
Price
($)
 Option
Expiration
Date
 Number
of Shares
or Units
of Stock
That Have
Not Vested
(#)(2)
 Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have Not
Vested
($)(3)
 Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units,
or Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested
(#)(2)
 Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or Payout
Value of Unearned
Shares, Units,
or Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested
($)(3)
Johnson 49,000   30.92 03/21/2022    
  47,000   34.24 03/28/2023    
  37,000   45.08 03/26/2024    
  55,000   56.35 12/01/2024    
  207,900   62.11 03/25/2025    
  139,380   63.79 03/23/2026    
  141,207   72.83 03/22/2027    
  91,093   44.78 03/28/2028    
  46,552 23,277  58.94 03/27/2029    
  79,582 159,164  21.60 03/25/2030    
   79,971  53.61 03/24/2031    
       20,360 904,595  
       30,032 1,334,322  
       55,556 2,468,353  
         180,191 8,005,886
         186,782 8,298,724
Page  8,333  58.25 04/13/2031    
       3,168 140,754  
       12,557 557,908  
         7,460 331,448
         16,726 743,136

 

78

2019     Foot Locker, Inc.2022 Proxy Statement

5979

 

 

 

Executive Compensation

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

    Option Awards       Stock Awards  
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Name
  
 
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable(1)
(#)
  
 
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable(1)
(#)
  
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned Options
(#)
  
 
 
 
 
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
  
 
 
 
 
 
Option
Expiration
Date
  
 
Number
of Shares
or Units
of Stock
That Have
Not Vested
(#)(2)
  
 
 
Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have Not
Vested
($)(3)
 Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units,
or Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested
(#)(2)
 Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or Payout
Value of Unearned
Shares, Units,
or Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested
($)(3)
Bracken 934   45.08 03/26/2024    
  1,250   62.11 03/25/2025    
  6,336   63.79 03/23/2026    
  6,419   72.83 03/22/2027    
  4,049   44.78 03/28/2028    
  2,910 1,455  58.94 03/27/2029    
  4,974 9,948  21.60 03/25/2030    
   9,895  53.61 03/24/2031    
       1,273 56,559  
       3,473 154,305  
       3,716 165,102  
       10,661 473,668  
         17,987 799,162
         22,296 990,611
Martin 17,442   55.02 06/13/2026    
  14,442   72.83 03/22/2027    
  9,110   44.78 03/28/2028    
  7,759 3,880  58.94 03/27/2029    
  13,263 26,528  21.60 03/25/2030    
   9,674  53.61 03/24/2031    
       3,394 150,795  
       3,554 157,904  
       3,633 161,414  
       9,260 411,422  
         21,797 968,441
         22,050 979,682

 

Notes to Table on Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

80

    Foot Locker, Inc.2022 Proxy Statement

81

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

    Option Awards       Stock Awards  
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j)
Name  
 
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable(1)
(#)
  
 
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable(1)
(#)
  
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned Options
(#)
  
 
 
 
 
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
  
 
 
 
 
 
Option
Expiration
Date
  
 
Number
of Shares
or Units
of Stock
That Have
Not Vested
(#)(2)
  
 
 
Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have Not
Vested
($)(3)
 Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units,
or Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested
(#)(2)
 Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or Payout
Value of Unearned
Shares, Units,
or Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested
($)(3)
Gray 1,400   45.08 03/26/2024    
  2,500   62.11 03/25/2025    
  6,336   63.79 03/23/2026    
  6,419   72.83 03/22/2027    
  25,606   34.75 10/02/2027    
  6,073   44.78 03/28/2028    
  2,910 1,455  58.94 03/27/2029    
  4,974 9,948  21.60 03/25/2030    
   9,674  53.61 03/24/2031    
       1,273 56,559  
       3,473 154,305  
       3,633 161,414  
       5,331 236,856  
         19,849 881,891
         21,797 968,441
Peters 34,000   45.08 03/26/2024    
  32,000   62.11 03/25/2025    
  28,510   63.79 03/23/2026    
  32,093   72.83 03/22/2027    
  20,243   44.78 03/28/2028    
  14,548   58.94 03/27/2029    
  33,159   21.60 03/25/2030    
         21,817 969,329
Talwar 18,166   67.07 09/23/2026    
  19,256   72.83 03/22/2027    
  12,146   44.78 03/28/2028    
  9,698   58.94 03/27/2029    
  13,079   21.60 03/25/2030    

82

    Foot Locker, Inc.2022 Proxy Statement

83

executive compensation

 

(1)TheVesting Schedules for the options shown in columns (b) and (c) are as follows:

 

Total
Securities Underlying
Unexercised OptionsVesting Date for 1/3Vesting Date for 1/3Vesting Date for 1/3
NameTotal
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Grant DateVesting Date
for ⅓ of
Total Grant
Vesting Date
for ⅓ of
Total Grant
Vesting Date
for ⅓ of
Total Grant
R. Johnson80,00003/23/201003/23/201103/23/201203/23/2013
80,00003/23/201103/23/201203/23/201303/23/2014
49,00003/21/201203/21/201303/21/201403/21/2015
 47,00003/28/201303/28/201403/28/201503/28/2016
 37,00003/26/201403/26/201503/26/201603/26/2017
 55,00012/01/201412/01/201512/01/201612/01/2017
 207,90003/25/201503/25/201603/25/201703/25/2018
 139,38003/23/201603/23/201703/23/201803/23/2019
 141,20703/22/201703/22/201803/22/201903/22/2020
 91,09303/28/201803/28/201903/28/202003/28/2021
 69,82903/27/201903/27/202003/27/202103/27/2022
238,74603/25/202003/25/202103/25/202203/25/2023
79,97103/24/202103/24/202203/24/202303/24/2024
927,5801,156,126    
L. PetersPage40,0008,33305/26/201104/13/202105/26/201204/13/202205/26/201304/13/202305/26/201404/13/2024
 44,0008,333
Bracken93403/21/201203/21/201303/21/26/201403/21/26/201503/26/201603/26/2017
 42,0001,25003/28/201303/28/201403/28/25/201503/28/25/201603/25/201703/25/2018
 6,33603/23/201603/23/201703/23/201803/23/2019
6,41903/22/201703/22/201803/22/201903/22/2020
4,04903/28/201803/28/201903/28/202003/28/2021
4,36503/27/201903/27/202003/27/202103/27/2022
14,92203/25/202003/25/202103/25/202203/25/2023
9,89503/24/202103/24/202203/24/202303/24/2024
48,170
Gray1,40003/26/201403/26/201503/26/201603/26/2017
2,50003/25/201503/25/201603/25/201703/25/2018
6,33603/23/201603/23/201703/23/201803/23/2019
6,41903/22/201703/22/201803/22/201903/22/2020
25,60610/02/201710/02/201810/02/201910/02/2020
6,07303/28/201803/28/201903/28/202003/28/2021
4,36503/27/201903/27/202003/27/202103/27/2022
14,92203/25/202003/25/202103/25/202203/25/2023
9,67403/24/202103/24/202203/24/202303/24/2024
77,295
Martin17,44206/13/201606/13/201706/13/201806/13/2019
14,44203/22/201703/22/201803/22/201903/22/2020
9,11003/28/201803/28/201903/28/202003/28/2021
11,63903/27/201903/27/202003/27/202103/27/2022
39,79103/25/202003/25/202103/25/202203/25/2023
9,67403/24/202103/24/202203/24/202303/24/2024
102,098

84

    Foot Locker, Inc.

executive compensation

NameTotal
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Grant DateVesting Date
for ⅓ of
Total Grant
Vesting Date
for ⅓ of
Total Grant
Vesting Date
for ⅓ of
Total Grant
Peters34,00003/26/201403/26/201503/26/201603/26/2017
 32,00003/25/201503/25/201603/25/201703/25/2018
 28,51003/23/201603/23/201703/23/201803/23/2019
 32,09303/22/201703/22/201803/22/201903/22/2020
 20,24303/28/201803/28/201903/28/202003/28/2021
 14,54803/27/201903/27/202003/27/202103/27/2022
33,15903/25/202003/25/202103/25/2022*
272,846194,553    
S. JacobsTalwar8,00018,16603/28/201303/28/201403/28/201503/28/2016
12,66703/26/201403/26/201503/26/201603/26/2017
13,60012/01/201412/01/201512/01/201612/01/2017
21,00003/25/201503/25/201603/25/201703/25/2018
28,51003/09/23/201603/09/23/201703/09/23/201803/09/23/2019
 32,09303/22/201703/22/201803/22/201903/22/2020
20,24303/28/201803/28/201903/28/202003/28/2021
136,113
L. Kimble19,00003/26/201403/26/201503/26/201603/26/2017
21,00003/25/201503/25/201603/25/201703/25/2018
28,51003/23/201603/23/201703/23/201803/23/2019
28,88403/22/201703/22/201803/22/201903/22/2020
18,21903/28/201803/28/201903/28/202003/28/2021
115,613
P. Verma11,34608/10/201508/10/201608/10/201708/10/2018
14,25503/23/201603/23/201703/23/201803/23/2019
14,44219,25603/22/201703/22/201803/22/201903/22/2020
 12,14603/28/201803/28/201903/28/202003/28/2021
 9,69803/27/201903/27/202003/27/2021*
13,07903/25/202003/25/2021**
52,18972,345    

*Unvested portion of stock option award cancelled upon termination of employment.

2022 Proxy Statement

85

executive compensation

 

(2)The vesting dates for the RSU awards shown in columnscolumn (g) and the PSUs shown in column (i) are set forth in the table below. The RSU awardsPSUs shown in column (i) consist of (a) PSUs granted in 2017 were not earned following the end of the 2018 fiscal year because threshold performance2020 for the 2017-182020-21 performance measurement period was not achieved;period; and the RSU awards shown in column (i)(b) PSUs granted in 20182021 that will be earned only if the threshold performance goals for the 2018-192021-22 performance measurement period are achieved and,(and, if earned, will vest in 2021.2024).

NameGrant DateType of Award

Shares (#)

Vesting Date 
Johnson03/27/2019RSU20,36003/27/2022 
03/25/2020RSU55,55603/25/2023 
11/17/2020PSU186,78203/25/2023 
03/24/2021RSU30,03203/24/2024 
03/24/2021PSU180,19103/24/2024 
Page04/12/2021RSU4,18504/12/2022 
04/12/2021RSU4,18604/12/2023 
04/12/2021RSU4,18604/12/2024 
04/12/2021PSU7,46003/25/2023 
04/12/2021PSU16,72603/24/2024 
04/13/2021RSU3,16804/13/2024 
Bracken03/27/2019RSU1,27303/27/2022 
03/25/2020RSU3,47303/25/2023 
11/17/2020PSU17,98703/25/2023 
03/24/2021RSU3,71603/24/2024 
11/16/2021RSU10,66111/16/2024 
03/24/2021PSU22,29603/24/2024 
Martin03/27/2019RSU3,39403/27/2022 
03/25/2020RSU9,26003/25/2023 
11/17/2020PSU22,05003/25/2023 
03/24/2021RSU3,63303/24/2024 
03/24/2021PSU21,79703/24/2024 
11/16/2021RSU3,55411/16/2024 
Gray03/27/2019RSU1,27303/27/2022 
03/25/2020RSU3,47303/25/2023 
11/17/2020PSU19,84903/25/2023 
03/24/2021RSU3,63303/24/2024 
03/24/2021PSU21,79703/24/2024 
11/16/2021RSU5,33111/16/2024 
Peters11/17/2020PSU21,81703/25/2023*

*Due to Ms. Peters’s retirement in 2021, she earned the pro rata portion of her PSU award for the 2020-21 performance period, as shown in the table, which will be paid to her at the same time as the payouts to the other NEOs in 2023.

(3)Values in columns (h) and (j) calculated by multiplying the number of unvested RSUs and PSUs, as applicable, by the closing price of $44.43 on January 28, 2022, which was the last business day of the 2021 fiscal year. The values shown in column (j) for the PSUs are based on:

the number of PSUs at maximum performance for the 2020-21 long-term performance period, which will vest in March 2023; and

the number of PSUs that may be earned at maximum performance for the 2021-22 long-term performance period, which, if earned, will vest in March 2024.

 

6086

    Foot Locker, Inc. 

 

 

 

 

Executive Compensation

Typeexecutive compensationShares/RSUs
NameGrant Dateof Award(#)Vesting Date
R. Johnson03/22/2017RSU9,44003/22/2020
03/28/2018RSU15,35303/28/2021
03/28/2018RSU25,12303/28/2021
04/12/2018RSU27,21603/24/2021
L. Peters03/23/2016RSU9,40603/23/2019
03/23/2016RSU9,40603/23/2020
03/22/2017RSU1,73803/22/2020
03/28/2018RSU3,76903/28/2021
03/28/2018RSU5,58303/28/2021
04/12/2018RSU4,08303/24/2021
04/12/2018RSU5,44403/24/2021
S. Jacobs03/23/2016RSU11,75703/23/2019
03/23/2016RSU11,75803/23/2020
03/22/2017RSU2,18903/22/2020
03/28/2018RSU4,74603/28/2021
03/28/2018RSU5,58303/28/2021
04/12/2018RSU6,12403/24/2021
04/12/2018RSU8,16503/24/2021
L. Kimble03/23/2016RSU15,67703/23/2019
03/22/2017RSU1,25603/22/2020
03/28/2018RSU2,72203/28/2021
03/28/2018RSU5,02503/28/2021
04/12/2018RSU4,08303/24/2021
04/12/2018RSU5,44403/24/2021
P. Verma03/22/2017RSU89803/22/2020
09/28/2017RSU21,51509/28/2020
09/28/2017RSU21,51509/28/2021
10/01/2017RSU11310/01/2020
10/01/2017RSU5710/01/2020
03/28/2018RSU2,30303/28/2021
03/28/2018RSU3,35003/28/2021
04/12/2018RSU3,06203/24/2021
04/12/2018RSU4,08303/24/2021

(3)Value calculated by multiplying the number of unvested shares or units by the closing price of $55.06 on February 2, 2019, which was the last business day of the 2018 fiscal year. The values shown in columns (h) and ( j) for the RSUs are based on:

the number of RSUs at threshold performance for the 2017-18 performance period, which were not earned following the end of the 2018 fiscal year because threshold performance for the 2017-18 performance measurement period was not achieved; and

the number of RSUs that may be earned at threshold performance for the 2018-19 long-term performance period.

2019 Proxy Statement    

61

Executive Compensation

 

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED IN FISCAL 2021

 

The following table provides information on the stock options exercised by, and RSU awards vested for, the NEOs during 2018 and restricted stock and RSU awards that vested during the year:2021:

 

Options Awards Stock AwardsOptions Awards Stock Awards
(a)(b)(c) (d)(e)(b) (c) (d)(e)
Number of Shares Number of Shares 
Acquired onValue Realized Acquired onValue Realized
Exerciseon Exercise Vestingon Vesting
Name(#)($) (#)($)Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise
(#)
 Value Realized on
Exercise
($)
Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
(#)
Value Realized on
Vesting
($)
L. Peters25,0001,048,000 
P. Verma 6,830327,635
Johnson 25,1231,405,632
Bracken 1,934106,295
Martin 19,579993,831
Gray 2,492131,515
Peters86,000(1)2,728,42618,2361,029,409
Talwar3,500 148,4747,433406,323

(1)Represents shares acquired upon the exercise of stock options by Ms. Peters after her retirement in 2021.

 

Pension Benefits

PENSION BENEFITS IN FISCAL 2021

 

The following table below provides the present value of the accumulated benefit payable to each of the NEOs and the years of service credited to each of them under the Retirement Plan, the Foot Locker Excess Cash Balance Plan, (the “Excess Plan”), and the SERP, as applicable, determined using interest rate and mortality rate assumptions consistent with those used in our 20182021 financial statements:statements.

 

(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)
  Number of YearsPresent Value ofPayments During
  Credited ServiceAccumulated BenefitLast Fiscal Year
NamePlan Name(#)(1)($)(1)($)
R. JohnsonRetirement Plan20211,688
 Excess Plan20787,763 
 SERP162,327,821 
   3,327,272 
L. PetersRetirement Plan20225,859
 Excess Plan20402,107 
 SERP171,448,356 
   2,076,322 
S. JacobsRetirement Plan19194,499
 Excess Plan19404,670 
 SERP101,203,269 
   1,802,438 
L. KimbleRetirement Plan39778,509
 Excess Plan39851,214 
 SERP9752,411 
   2,382,134 
P. VermaRetirement Plan216,530
 Excess Plan224,613 
 SERP4219,638 
   260,781 
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)
NamePlan NameNumber
of Years
Credited
Service
(#)(1)
Present
Value of
Accumulated
Benefit
($)(1)
Payments
During Last
Fiscal Year
($)
JohnsonRetirement Plan23286,813
 Excess Cash Plan231,416,715
 SERP194,063,958
   5,767,486
BrackenRetirement Plan980,850
 Excess Cash Plan957,121
   137,971
MartinRetirement Plan417,857
 Excess Cash Plan419,175
 SERP6434,349
   471,381

 

Notes to Pension Benefits Table

2022 Proxy Statement

87

executive compensation

(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)
NamePlan NameNumber
of Years
Credited
Service
(#)(1)
Present
Value of
Accumulated
Benefit
($)(1)
Payments
During Last
Fiscal Year
($)
GrayRetirement Plan3(2)62,420
 Excess Cash Plan3(2)103,316
   165,736
PetersRetirement Plan23315,370
 Excess Cash Plan23532,023
 SERP191,505,384375,637
   1,820,754907,660
TalwarRetirement Plan317,306
 Excess Cash Plan320,177
 SERP5(3)
   37,483

 

(1)In general, the present value of accumulated benefits was determined using the same measurement date (February 2, 2019)(January 29, 2022) and assumptions used for financial reporting purposes. Expected retirement age for the Retirement Plan and the Excess Plan is equal to normal retirement age as defined by the plans. For the SERP, the age at which participants become eligible for retirement under the plan is used as the expected retirement age. The following key assumptions were used in calculating the values in the table above:values:

 

ASC 715 discount rate of 4.1%3.2% for the Retirement Plan and ASC 715 discount rate of 3.8%2.7% for the Excess Cash Plan and the SERP;

 

Retirement age is assumed to be 65 forFor the Retirement Plan and the Excess Plan;Cash Plan, retirement age is assumed to be 65; for the SERP, the retirement age is assumed to be when age plus years of service equals 65 for participants in the plan on May 26, 2011 and, for participants in the SERP after thissuch date, when the participant reaches age 55 with 10 years of service; and

 

Form of payment for the Retirement Plan and the Excess Cash Plan is a lump sum and form of payment for the SERP is 12 quarterly installments.installments; and

Ms. Peters’s SERP amount, and Mr. Talwar’s Retirement Plan, Excess Cash Plan, and SERP amounts, reflect no credited service for fiscal year 2021.

(2)While Mr. Gray has participated in the Retirement Plan and the Excess Cash Plan for 3 years, his crediting rate was based on his 19 years of service in accordance with the plan.

(3)The total benefit payable to Mr. Talwar under the SERP was forfeited when his employment was terminated.

 

The years of service for the SERP reflect the number of years that the executiveNEO has been approved by the CompensationHuman Capital Committee as a participant in that plan.

DEFINED BENEFIT RETIREMENT PLANS

 

62RETIREMENT PLAN

    Foot Locker, Inc.

Executive Compensation

Defined Benefit Retirement Plans

Foot Locker Retirement Plan

 

The Retirement Plan is a defined benefit plan with a cash balance formula wherein each participant has an account for record keeping purposes only, which covers eligible employeesteam members of the Company and substantially all of its U.S. subsidiaries. All qualified employeessubsidiaries who arewere at least 21 years old with one year of service are covered underbefore the Retirement Plan. Plan was frozen on December 31, 2019. The Retirement Plan takes into account only base salary and Annual Incentive Plan awards in determining pension benefits. Therefore, LTI Awards have no effect on the calculation of benefits or payments under this plan.

Plan participants become fully vested in their benefits under this plan generally upon completion of three years of service or upon reaching normal retirement age (age 65) while actively employed.

 

UnderThe Retirement Plan was frozen as of December 31, 2019, for new participants (including rehires), and for benefit accruals for participants with fewer than 11 years of benefit service.

Participants with 11 or more years of benefit service as of December 31, 2019 will continue to earn credits annually for a three-year transition period ending December 31, 2022 under the cash balance formula each participant has an account, for record keeping purposes only, to which credits are allocated annually based upon a percentage of the participant’s W-2 Compensation, as defined in the Retirement Plan. After this three-year transition period, compensation credits will no longer accrue. This percentage is determined bybased on the participant’s years of service with the Company as of the beginning of each calendar year. The following table shows the percentages of employees’ compensation used to determine credits for each of the years of service indicated:

 

Years of ServicePercent of All W-2 Compensation (%)+Percent of W-2 Compensation Over $22,000 (%)
< 61.10 0.55
6-101.50 0.75
11-152.00 1.00
16-202.70 1.35
21-253.70 1.85
26-304.90 2.45
31-356.60 3.30
> 358.90 4.45

88

    Foot Locker, Inc.

executive compensation

Years of ServicePercent of All W-2
Compensation
(%)
+Percent of
W-2 Compensation
Over $22,000
(%)
< 61.10 0.55
6–101.50 0.75
11–152.00 1.00
16–202.70 1.35
21–253.70 1.85
26–304.90 2.45
31–356.60 3.30
> 358.90 4.45

 

In addition, allAll existing balances in the participants’ accounts as of December 31, 2019 earn interest at the fixed rate of 6%, which is credited annually.

At retirement or other termination of employment, an amount equal to the vested balance then credited to the account under the Retirement Plan is payable to the participant in the form of a qualified joint and survivor annuity (if the participant is married)(available to married participants) or a life annuity (if the participant is unmarried).annuity. The participant may elect, upon retirement, to waive the annuity form of benefit and receive benefits under the plan upon retirement in an optional annuity form or an immediate or deferred lump sum, or, upon other termination of employment, in a lump sum. Additional optional forms of payment are available to participants who were participating in the Retirement Plan as of December 31, 1995.

 

Foot Locker Excess Cash Balance PlanAll U.S.-based team members and expatriate U.S. team members who met the eligibility requirements prior to the plan being frozen on December 31, 2019, including Messrs. Johnson, Bracken, Martin, and Gray, are participants in the Retirement Plan. Ms. Peters and Mr. Talwar were active participants prior to their termination of employment.

EXCESS CASH PLAN

 

The IRC limits annual retirement benefits that may be paid to, and the compensation that may be taken into account in calculating benefits for, any person covered under a qualified retirement plan, such as the Retirement Plan. Accordingly, the Company has adopted the Excess Cash Plan for any person covered by the Retirement Plan whose annual retirement benefit, calculated in accordance with the terms of the Retirement Plan, exceeds the limitations of the IRC, the Company has adopted theIRC. The Excess Plan. The ExcessCash Plan is an unfunded, non-qualified benefit plan, under which the individual is paid the difference between the IRC limitations and the retirement benefit to which he or shethey would otherwise be entitled under the Retirement Plan. The Excess Cash Plan takes into account only base salary and Annual Incentive Plan awards in determining pension benefits. Therefore, LTI Awards have no effect on the calculation of benefits or payments under this plan.

 

2019 Proxy Statement    

63

Executive CompensationThe Excess Cash Plan was frozen as of December 31, 2019 for new participants (including rehires), and for benefit accruals for participants with fewer than 11 years of benefit service.

 

EarlyParticipants with 11 or more years of benefit service as of December 31, 2019 will continue to earn credits annually for a three-year transition period ending December 31, 2022 under the cash balance formula based upon a percentage of the participant’s W-2 Compensation, as defined in the Retirement EligibilityPlan. After this three-year transition period, compensation credits will no longer accrue. This percentage is determined based on the participant’s years of service with the Company as of the beginning of each calendar year. The table above shows the percentages used to determine credits for each of the years of service in the Excess Cash Plan.

EARLY RETIREMENT ELIGIBILITY

 

The Retirement Plan provides for a reduced benefit payment to a participant who retires after reaching early retirement age but prior to normal retirement age. Early retirement age is defined under the Retirement Plan and the Excess Cash Plan as age 55 with at least 5 years of vesting service. All ofMr. Johnson is the NEOs other than Mr. Verma areonly NEO currently eligible for early retirement under these plans. Ms. Peters was eligible for early retirement under these plans and elected early retirement in 2021.

 

Foot Locker Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

2022 Proxy Statement

89

executive compensation

 

In addition,SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN

The Company maintains a SERP for certain senior officers of the Company and other key employees who met the eligibility requirements prior to the plan being frozen for new participants (including rehires) after December 31, 2018. The SERP which is an unfunded and non-qualified benefit plan that provides for payment by the Company of supplemental retirement, death, and disability benefits to certain executive officersbenefits. Messrs. Johnson and certainMartin, as well as five other key employees of the Company and its subsidiaries who participate in this plan. The Compensation Committee sets an annual targeted incentive award under the SERP for each participant consisting of a percentage of salary and bonus based on the Company’s performance against the target. Achievement of the target causes an 8% credit to a participant’s account for that year. The applicable percentage for the year increases or decreases proportionately to the percentage of the Company’s performance in relation to the target, but may not be less than 4% or more than 12% in any year. Participants’ accounts accrue simple interest at the rate of 6% annually.

The NEOs and six other executive officers currentlycurrent executives, participate in the SERP. Participants in the SERP prior to May 26, 2011 are eligible to receive a benefit only if their age plus years of service at retirement equals at least 65. For persons who become participants in the SERP on or after this date, they would be eligible to receive a benefit only if they are at least age 55 at retirement with 10 years of service. Other than Mr. Verma, each of the NEOs participated in the SERP on May 26, 2011 and has age plus years of service totaling at least 65. Mr. Verma became a participant in the SERP upon his employment commencement date in August 2015 and he is not currently vested in the plan.

 

If a participant’s employment terminates due to death or disability, the participant (or the participant’s estate) would be entitled to payment of the participant’s SERP balance. A participant’s SERP benefit is paid in 12 quarterly installments following retirement, with the first two quarters payable no earlier than six months following retirement. Upon death or disability, a participant’s SERP benefit is paid in a lump sum. For participants in the plan prior to February 2, 2014, the SERP provides for the continuation of medical and dental insurance benefits if an executive meets the applicable age and service requirements when the participants’participant’s employment terminates. The benefits would be substantially the same as those benefits to which senior executives are entitled under the Company’s medical and dental plans for active employees.team members. The terminated executive would be required to pay the insurance premium applicable to actively employedactively-employed senior executives, including any increases in the premiums, and the Company would pay the difference between the actual premium rate and the active employeeteam member rate.

Participants in the SERP prior to May 26, 2011, including Mr. Johnson, are eligible to receive a benefit only if their age plus years of service at retirement equals at least 65. For persons who became participants in the SERP on or after this date, including Mr. Martin, they are eligible to receive a benefit only if they are at least age 55 at retirement with 10 years of service. The SERP was frozen for new participants (including rehires) after December 31, 2018, and for new benefit awards for plan years after December 31, 2022 (however, interest credit for participants continues to accrue). Under the terms of the SERP, executives are vested in their account balances based upon a combination of age and service. As of the end of 2021, of the NEOs, only Mr. Johnson was vested under the SERP. Ms. Peters was vested at the time of the termination of her employment.

The Human Capital Committee sets an annual targeted incentive award under the SERP for each participant consisting of a percentage of salary and Annual Incentive Plan awards (if paid) based on the Company’s performance against the target; therefore, LTI Awards have no effect on the calculation of benefits or payments under this plan. Achievement of the target causes a credit equal to 8% of covered compensation to a participant’s account for that year. The applicable percentage for the year increases or decreases proportionately to the percentage of the Company’s performance in relation to the target, but may not be less than 4% or more than 12% in any year. Participants’ accounts accrue simple interest at the rate of 6% annually. Based upon the Company’s performance in 2021, a credit of 11.3% of each participant’s respective 2021 base salary was made to the SERP. As of the end of 2021, Mr. Johnson and Mr. Martin’s account balances were $4,214,478 and $436,414, respectively.

401(k) PLAN

The Company has a 401(k) Plan that is available to team members whose primary place of employment is in the United States, as well as expatriate U.S. team members. Eligible team members may contribute to the 401(k) Plan following 28 days of employment and are eligible for Company matching contributions upon completion of one year of service consisting of at least 1,000 hours. Messrs. Johnson, Bracken, Martin, and Gray participate in the 401(k) Plan and the Excess Savings Plan. As of January 1, 2021, the 401(k) Plan allows eligible team members to contribute up to 40% of their compensation on a pre-tax basis, subject to a maximum of $19,500 (which was increased to $20,500 effective January 1, 2022). The Company matches 100% of employees’ pre-tax contributions on up to the first 1% of the employees’ compensation (subject to certain IRC limitations), and 50% of the next 5%, subject to a maximum match of 3.5% if the participant contributes at least 6% to the plan. The matching contribution is made in cash and vests over two years. See Note 7 to the Summary Compensation Table beginning on page 70 for the amount of the Company’s match under the 401(k) and Excess Savings Plans to the NEOs’ accounts.

 

6490

    Foot Locker, Inc. 

 

 

 

 

Executive Compensationexecutive compensation

 

Potential Payments Upon TerminationNONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION IN FISCAL 2021

The table below provides the amount of contributions and earnings during the last fiscal year to each of the NEOs under the Excess Savings Plan, as well as aggregate withdrawals and distributions and aggregate year-end balances.

(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)
NameExecutive
Contributions
During Last
Fiscal Year
($)
Registrant
Contributions
During Last
Fiscal Year
($)(1)
Aggregate
Earnings
During Last
Fiscal Year
($)(2)
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
Aggregate
Balance at
Last Fiscal
Year End
($)
Bracken32,32525744,466
Martin30,42831946,653
Talwar18511,458

(1)The amounts shown in column (c) are reported as compensation for the officers in fiscal year 2021 in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table.

(2)The amounts shown in column (d) are not reported in the Summary Compensation Table because the earnings are not preferential.

EXCESS SAVINGS PLAN

Participants in our 401(k) Plan for whom contributions are limited by Section 401(a)(17) of the IRC participate in the Excess Savings Plan, which is an unfunded, non-qualified benefit plan. See Note 7 to the Summary Compensation Table beginning on page 70 for the amount of the Company’s match under the 401(k) and Excess Savings Plans to the NEOs’ accounts. The Excess Savings Plan does not permit employees to elect to defer any compensation, but instead solely provides for the crediting of Company matching contributions. In fiscal year 2021, we made a matching contribution to each participant’s bookkeeping account under the Excess Savings Plan at the same rate of contribution as our 401(k) Plan. Company matching contributions vest to the same extent that the participant’s employer matching contributions vest under the 401(k) Plan. Each participant’s account is credited with simple interest per annum at a rate of 120% of the annually compounded long-term applicable federal rate as reported as of December of the prior year. Following a termination of employment, distributions of a participant’s vested account balance will be made in a lump sum on the first payroll date of the month that occurs thirty days after the termination date (or such later date as may be required by Section 409A of the IRC, or Change in Controlthe event of death, no later than December 31 of the year following the year in which the participant’s death occurs).

2022 Proxy Statement

91

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

 

The NEOs’ employment agreements and certain of the plans and programs that the NEOs participate in require the Company to pay compensation to the NEOs if their employment terminates under certain circumstances. Estimates of the compensation, benefits, and vesting of equity grants that may be payable to the NEOs upon termination of employment or change in control, including amounts already vested, are included in the tables below. These estimates reflect that no LTIP payouts were earnedExcept for Mr. Talwar and Ms. Peters, the 2016-17 or 2017-18 performance measurement periods. The information in the tables assumes a termination date of February 2, 2019. AtJanuary 29, 2022, using the close of trading on February 2, 2019, ourclosing stock price was $55.06on January 28, 2022 of $44.43 per share. For Mr. Talwar, and Ms. Peters the information in the tables reflect his termination date of December 16, 2021, and her retirement date of May 1, 2021, respectively, and reports actual amounts.

 

   Payments  
    Time-Based RSUs,     Excess Cash         
    PBRSUs, and     Balance  Health  Life   
 Severance  Options  SERP  Plan  Benefits  Insurance  Total
Termination Event ($)  ($)  ($)(1)  ($)(2)  ($)(3)  ($)(4)  ($)Severance
($)
 RSUs, PSUs,
and Stock
Options
($)
 SERP
($)(1)
Excess Cash
Balance Plan
($)(2)
Excess
Saving Plan
($)(3)
Health
Benefits
($)(4)
Life
Insurance ($)(5)
R. Johnson                    
Johnson  
By Company w/o Cause 4,084,000(5) 4,625,125(6) 2,449,041  726,666  721,705    12,606,5376,476,900(6)13,933,921(7)351,2071,375,698649,715
By Executive For Good Reason 4,084,000(5) 4,625,125(6) 2,449,041  726,666  721,705    12,606,5376,476,900(6)13,933,921(7)351,2071,375,698649,715
Resignation     2,449,041  726,666  721,705    3,897,412  351,2071,375,698649,715
Change in Control(7) 6,625,000(8) 6,008,398(9) 2,449,041  726,666  721,705    16,530,810
Change in Control(8)6,907,000(9)18,641,191(10)351,2071,375,698649,715
Disability   5,384,104(10) 2,449,041  726,666  721,705    9,281,516 16,824,334(11)4,214,4781,375,698649,715
Death   5,384,104(10) 2,449,041  726,666    1,100,000  9,659,811 16,824,334(11)4,214,4781,375,6981,150,000
Retirement   2,002,814(11) 2,449,041  726,666  721,705    5,900,226 14,879,144(12)351,2071,375,698649,715
Cause       726,666      726,666  1,375,698
L. Peters                    
Page  
By Company w/o Cause922,500(13) 
By Executive for Good Reason922,500(13) 
Change in Control(8)2,152,500(9)1,215,894(10)
Disability 1,215,894(11)
Death 1,215,894(11)615,000
Retirement 703,882(12)
Bracken  
By Company w/o Cause 1,012,500(12)   1,523,777  345,211  874,219    3,755,7071,200,000(13) 34,51544,466
By Executive for Good Reason 1,012,500(12)  69,359(13) 1,523,777  345,211  874,219    3,825,0661,200,000(13)113,556(14)34,51544,466
Resignation     1,523,777  345,211  874,219    2,743,207  34,51544,466
Change in Control(7) 1,856,250(8) 2,565,768(9) 1,523,777  345,211  874,219    7,165,225
Change in Control(8)3,200,000(9)2,123,563(10)34,51544,466
Disability 2,010,007(11)34,51544,466
Death 2,010,007(11)34,51544,466800,000
Retirement 1,388,742(12)34,51544,466
Martin  
By Company w/o Cause922,500(13) 13,85746,653
By Executive for Good Reason922,500(13)302,817(14)13,85746,653
Resignation  13,85746,653
Change in Control(8)2,152,500(9)2,708,973(10)13,85746,653
Disability   2,427,029(10) 1,523,777  345,211  874,219    5,170,236 2,406,156(11)436,41413,85746,653
Death   2,427,029(10) 1,523,777  345,211    675,000  4,971,017 2,406,156(11)436,41413,85746,653615,000
Retirement   484,346(11) 1,523,777  345,211  874,219    3,227,553 1,978,472(12)13,85746,653
Cause       345,211      345,211  13,85746,653
S. Jacobs                    
By Company w/o Cause 1,275,000(12)   1,265,928  335,514  1,038,844    3,915,286
By Executive for Good Reason 1,275,000(12)  69,359(13) 1,265,928  335,514  1,038,844    3,984,645
Resignation     1,265,928  335,514  1,038,844    2,640,286
Change in Control(7) 2,337,500(8) 3,231,938(9) 1,265,928  335,514  1,038,844    8,209,724
Disability   3,093,199(10) 1,265,928  335,514  1,038,844    5,733,485
Death   3,093,199(10) 1,265,928  335,514    850,000  5,544,641
Retirement   591,934(11) 1,265,928  335,514  1,038,844     3,232,220
Cause       335,514      335,514
L. Kimble(14)                    
By Company w/o Cause 975,000(12)   791,591  782,368  721,705    3,270,664
By Executive for Good Reason 975,000(12) 62,430(13) 791,591  782,368  721,705    3,333,094
Resignation     791,591  782,368  721,705    2,295,664
Change in Control(7) 1,787,500(8) 2,226,356(9) 791,591  782,368  721,705    6,309,520
Disability   2,101,495(10) 791,591  782,368  721,705    4,397,159
Death   2,101,495(10) 791,591  782,368    650,000  4,325,454
Retirement   362,150(11) 791,591  782,368  721,705    2,657,814
Cause       782,368      782,368
P. Verma                    
By Company w/o Cause 825,000(12)   178,053  15,427      1,018,480
By Executive for Good Reason 825,000(12) 41,613(13) 178,053  15,427      1,060,093
Resignation     178,053  15,427      193,480
Change in Control(7) 1,512,500(8) 3,381,770(9) 178,053  15,427      5,087,750
Disability   3,298,523(10) 178,053  15,427      3,492,003
Death   3,298,523(10) 178,053  15,427    550,000  4,042,003
Cause       15,427      15,427

 

92

2019 Proxy Statement        Foot Locker, Inc.

65

 

 

 

Executive CompensationEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Termination EventSeverance
($)
 RSUs, PSUs,
and Stock
Options
($)
 SERP
($)(1)
Excess Cash
Balance Plan
($)(2)
Excess
Saving Plan
($)(3)
Health
Benefits
($)(4)
Life
Insurance
($)(5)
Gray       
By Company w/o Cause922,500(13) 53,994
By Executive for Good Reason922,500(13)113,556(14)53,994
Resignation  53,994
Change in Control(8)2,152,500(9)1,960,260(10)53,994
Disability 1,846,704(11)53,994
Death 1,846,704(11)53,994615,000
Retirement 1,448,656(12)53,994
Cause  53,994
Talwar(15)       
Actual Payments1,000,058(16) 20,44911,564
Peters       
Actual Payments 2,014,433(17)1,556,210972,700

 

(1)This amount is the total benefit payable under the SERP (other than health benefits reported in the “Health Benefits” column). Upon termination other than due to disability or death, the payments would be made quarterly over a three-year period with the first two quarterly payments made on the first day of the calendar quarter that occurs six months following the executive’sNEO’s termination date, and the remaining payments made quarterly during the remainder of the three-year period. Upon termination due to disability or death, payments would be made in a lump sum following the disability or death. Mr. Talwar was not vested, and forfeited his benefit, upon his termination. Ms. Peters has begun receiving payments under the SERP, and the amounts reported in this column reflect the total actual amounts that she is expected to receive under the SERP (other than health benefits reported in the “Health Benefits” column).

 

(2)Benefit payable as of February 2, 2019January 29, 2022 in a lump sum under the Foot Locker Excess Cash Balance Plan six months following the executive’sNEO’s termination date. No information is provided with respect to the benefit under the Retirement Plan because that plan is available generally to all salaried employeesteam members (except as described in Retirement Plan beginning on page 88) and does not discriminate in terms of scope, terms, or operation in favor of the executive officers. Mr. Talwar will receive his benefit six months following his termination date. With respect to Ms. Peters, payment owed under the Excess Cash Balance Plan has been completed and no further benefit is due to her under this program.

(3)Benefit payable as of January 29, 2022 in a lump sum under the Excess Savings Plan on the first payroll date of the month that occurs thirty days after the termination date (or such later date as may be required by Section 409A of the IRC), or in the event of death, no later than December 31 of the year following the year in which the participant’s death occurs. No information is provided with respect to the benefit under the 401(k) Plan because that plan is available generally to all salaried team members and does not discriminate in terms of scope, terms, or operation in favor of the executive officers.

 

(3)(4)The amount shown represents the actuarial present value of all future expected post-termination medical and dental insurance benefits under the SERP and the employment agreements. The benefits provided, and premiums (including any subsequent increases) required to be paid by the executive,NEO, would be substantially the same for active employees.team members. The benefit amount assumes the executiveNEO does not qualify for disability benefits or other benefits under Medicare.

 

(4)(5)Senior executive life insurance is payable following death in a lump sum to the executive’sNEO’s beneficiary.

 

(5)(6)This severance amount includes the following items provided for under Mr. Johnson’s employment agreement:

 

Salary continuation for 24 months.Payment of the first twelve months of salary continuation would be made in a lump sum within 10 days following the six-month anniversary of termination, and the remaining payments would then be made on a monthly basis beginning on the twelve-month anniversary of termination ($2,200,000)2,300,000).

 

Annual Bonus for Year of Termination.For the fiscal year in which termination occurs, payment of the annual bonusAnnual Incentive Plan payouts that would have otherwise been earned if such termination had not occurred, pro ratedprorated as of the Termination Date, to be paid at the same time as other annual bonuses for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs ($1,859,000)4,169,900).

 

Outplacement.The approximate cost of one year of outplacement services ($25,000)7,000).

 

(6)(7)Pro Rata Payment of any Unearned LTIP and AFG Awards.PSUs. Pursuant to Mr. Johnson’s employment agreement, with respect to any non-completed performance period during which termination occurs, payment of any LTIP and AFGPSU awards that would have otherwise been earned if such termination had not occurred, as pro ratedprorated through the termination date. The amount shown includes the sum of the value of the PBRSUsPSUs that the executiveNEO would have been entitled to receive under the (A) LTIP based on the pro ratedprorated target level achievement of the performance goals for the 2018-192021-22 performance measurement period (30,706 PBRSUs); and (B) AFG based on the pro rated target level achievement of the performance goals for the 2018-20 performance measurement period (36,288 PBRSUs)(45,048 PSUs). The PBRSUsPSUs would become immediately vested and payable. The PBRSUsPSUs were valued at $55.06.$44.43 per share.

 

Payment of any Earned and Unvested LTIP AwardPSUs and Vesting of Stock Options.Pursuant to Mr. Johnson’s employment agreement, with respect to any completed performance period during which termination occurs, payment of any LTIPPSU award that is earned and unvested as of the termination date. The amount shown includes the (A) PSUs based on the (i) prorated actual level achievement of the performance goals for the 2020-21 performance measurement period (186,782 PSUs), and (ii) actual level achievement of the performance goals for the 2019-20 performance measurement period (0 PSUs), and (B) intrinsic value on February 2, 2019January 29, 2022 of 231,691262,412 stock options that would vest.

 

(7)(8)This covers termination by the Company without Cause or by the executiveNEO for Good Reason during the two-year period following a Change in Control (each as defined in the executive’sNEO’s employment agreement). If the payments or benefits received by the executiveNEO following a Change in Control are subject to the excise tax under Section 4999 of the IRC, then the Company would automatically reduce the executive’sNEO payments and benefits to an amount equal to $1 less than the amount that would subject the executiveNEO to the excise tax, as long as the reduced amount would result in a greater benefit to the executiveNEO compared to the unreduced amount on a net after-tax basis.

 

(8)(9)The severance amount equals two times the sum of the executive’sNEO’s annual salary plus annual bonusAnnual Incentive Plan payout at target under the Annual Bonus Plan or other annual incentive plan applicable to the executive.target. With respect to Mr. Johnson, it also includes the approximate cost of one year of outplacement services ($25,000)7,000).

(9)The amount shown represents the sum of the (A) value of the time-based RSUs that would vest; (B) value of the PBRSUs that the executive would have been entitled to receive under the LTIP based on the pro rated target level achievement of the performance goals for the 2018-19 performance measurement period; (C) value of the PBRSUs that the executive would have been entitled to receive under the AFG based on the pro rated target level achievement of the performance goals for the 2018-20 performance measurement period; and (D) intrinsic value on February 2, 2019 of the stock options that would vest. The RSUs would become immediately vested and payable. The time-based RSUs and PBRSUs were valued at $55.06.

  LTIPAFG 
 Time-Based RSUsPBRSUsPBRSUsStock Options
 (#)(#)(#)(#)
R. Johnson25,12330,70636,288231,691
L. Peters29,8397,5375,44451,143
S. Jacobs37,2639,4918,16551,143
L. Kimble26,1465,4445,44446,979
P. Verma50,4634,6064,08326,526

 

(10)The amount shown represents the sum of the (A) value of the time-based RSUs some or all of which may be accelerated by the Compensation Committee;that would vest, (B) value of the PBRSUsPSUs that the executiveNEO would have been entitled to receive under the LTIP based on the (i) prorated target level achievement of the performance goals for the 2018-192021-22 performance measurement period, pro rated to the termination date; (C) value of the PBRSUs that the executive would have been entitled to receive under the AFG based on the target(ii) actual level achievement of the performance goals for the 2018-192020-21 performance measurement period, pro rated toand (iii) actual level achievement of the termination date;performance goals for the 2019-20 performance measurement period, and (D)(C) intrinsic value on February 2, 2019January 29, 2022 of the stock options that would vest. The RSUs would become immediately vested and payable. The RSUs and PSUs were valued at $44.43 per share.

 

2022 Proxy Statement

6693

    Foot Locker, Inc.

 

 

 

Executive CompensationEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

the stock options that would vest. The PBRSUs would be paid out at the same time as the payouts are made to the other participants in the plan for this performance period in 2021. The time-based RSUs and PBRSUs were valued at $55.06. The actual value of the time-based RSUs to the executive would depend upon the Company’s stock price on the payout date in 2021.

  LTIPAFG 
 Time-Based RSUsPBRSUsPBRSUsStock Options
 (#)(#)(#)(#)
R. Johnson25,12330,70636,288123,893
L. Peters29,8397,5375,44426,947
S. Jacobs37,2639,4918,16526,947
L. Kimble26,1465,4445,44425,204
P. Verma50,4634,6064,08313,614
 RSUs
(#)
PSUs
(#)
Stock Options
(#)
Johnson105,948231,830262,412
Page15,72511,6428,333
Bracken19,12323,56121,298
Martin19,84127,50040,082
Gray13,71025,29921,077

 

(11)The amount shown represents the sum of the (A) value of the PBRSUsRSUs, some or all of which may be accelerated by the Human Capital Committee, (B) value of the PSUs that the executive would have been entitled to receive under the LTIP based on the (i) target level achievement of the performance goals for the 2018-192021-22 performance period, pro ratedprorated to the termination date;date, (ii) actual level achievement of the performance goals for the 2020-21 performance measurement period, and (B)(iii) actual level achievement of the performance goals for the 2019-20 performance measurement period, and (C) intrinsic value on February 2, 2019January 29, 2022 of the stock options that would vest. The RSUsPSUs would be paid out at the same time as the payouts are made to the other participants in the plan in 2021.plan. The PBRSUsRSUs and PSUs were valued at $55.06.$44.43 per share. The actual value of the PBRSUsRSUs and PSUs to the executiveNEO would depend upon the Company’s stock price on the payout date in 2021.date.

 

 LTIP 
 PBRSUsStock Options
 (#)(#)
R. Johnson30,706123,893
L. Peters7,53726,947
S. Jacobs9,49126,947
L. Kimble5,44425,204
P. Verma4,60613,614
 RSUs
(#)
PSUs
(#)
Stock Options
(#)
Johnson105,948231,830129,516
Page15,72511,6422,777
Bracken19,12323,5619,727
Martin19,84127,50020,368
Gray13,71025,2999,653

 

(12)The amount shown represents the sum of the (A) value of the RSUs, some or all of which may be accelerated by the Human Capital Committee, prorated based on days employed between the grant date and termination date, (B) value of the PSUs that the NEO would have been entitled to receive based on the (i) target level achievement of the performance goals for the 2021-22 performance period, prorated to the termination date, (ii) actual level achievement of the performance goals for the 2020-21 performance measurement period, and (iii) actual level achievement of the performance goals for the 2019-20 performance measurement period, and (C) intrinsic value on January 29, 2022 of the stock options that would vest. The PSUs would be paid out at the same time as the payouts are made to the other participants in the plan. The PSUs were valued at $44.43 per share. The actual value of the PSUs to the NEO would depend upon the Company’s stock price on the payout date.

 RSUs
(#)
PSUs
(#)
Stock Options
(#)
Johnson62,167231,830129,516
Page4,20111,6422,777
Bracken5,14023,5619,727
Martin10,21527,50020,368
Gray4,75125,2999,653

(13)The severance amount equals one-and-a-half times the executive’sNEO’s annual salary, payable in lump sum within 10 days of the six-month anniversary of the termination date.

 

(13)(14)The amount shown represents the intrinsic value on February 2, 2019January 29, 2022 of the stock options that would vest.

 

 Stock Options

(#)
L. PetersPage26,9472,777
S. JacobsBracken26,9479,727
L. KimbleMartin25,20420,368
P. VermaGray13,6149,653

 

(14)(15)Mr. Kimble would be entitledTalwar ceased to serve as Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer—EMEA effective November 17, 2021, and departed from the Company, on December 16, 2021, at which time his employment agreement terminated. The Human Capital Committee determined that Mr. Talwar’s departure constituted a termination without cause under the IAPterms of his employment agreement and the Company benefit plans, and accordingly, certain amounts were required to certain benefitsbe paid to Mr. Talwar under his employment agreement and the Company benefit plans.

(16)This severance amount consists of the following items provided for under Mr. Talwar’s separation agreement, which reflect required payments owed under Mr. Talwar’s employment agreement on a termination without cause, which the Human Capital Committee determined was appropriate based on the circumstances of Mr. Talwar’s departure:

94

    Foot Locker, Inc.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

One-and-a-half times Mr. Talwar’s annual salary. Severance payment under Mr. Talwar’s employment agreement will be processed six months after his termination date of December 16, 2021.

Vacation Payout. During the pay period following his termination date, Mr. Talwar was paid the dollar amount equivalent of his unused vacation accrued up until his termination date.

(17)In accordance with the treatment of Ms. Peters’s departure as a retirement, the amount shown includes the sum of the (A) value of the accelerated RSUs (7,209), (B) PSUs based on the actual level achievement of the performance goals for the 2020-21 performance measurement period (21,817 PSUs), and (C) intrinsic value on April 30, 2021 of 21,429 stock options that were vested. The RSUs and PSUs were valued using the closing stock price on April 30, 2021 ($58.98 per share).

 

CEO Pay Ratio

PAY RATIO

 

The following information is a reasonable good faith estimate calculated in a manner consistent with the SEC pay ratio rules and methods for disclosure. The SEC rules do not specify a single methodology for identification of the median employeeteam member or calculation of the CEO pay ratio, and other companies may use different assumptions, adjustments, exclusions, or estimates in calculating their CEO pay ratio. Accordingly, CEO pay ratio disclosures may involve a degree of imprecision and may be inconsistent in methodology among different companies. Therefore, the CEO pay ratio disclosed by other companies may not be comparable to the Company’s CEO pay ratio as disclosed below. Using the methodology described below, our CEO pay ratio based on fiscal year 20182021 compensation is approximately 1,627:1,191:1.

 

To calculate our CEO pay ratio,It is no longer appropriate for us to use the median team member we used the same median employee identified as of December 31, 2017. We2020 for purposes of this year’s Proxy Statement because of a change in the original median team member’s circumstances that we reasonably believe there have been no changes in our employee population or our compensation arrangements in 2018 that would result in a significant change in our pay ratio disclosure ordisclosure. Accordingly, we have identified another team member utilizing the same compensation measure used to select the original median team member. We identified our median employee.team member and calculated our CEO pay ratio as follows:

We identified the median team member using our team member population as of the final day of our payroll year, December 31, 2021.

We utilized a CACM across our global team member population to calculate the median team member compensation. For our CACM, we used base salary derived from our payroll records. Our team members receive a base salary, calculated on an hourly, weekly, monthly, or annual basis. As a result, base salary provides an accurate depiction of earnings for the purpose of identifying our median team member. Because we do not widely offer Annual Incentive Plan awards or LTI awards to our team members, such awards were excluded from our CACM. Given our workforce and the high turnover rates inherent in the retail industry, our methodology included annualizing the compensation for all permanent team members (full-time and part-time) who did not work a full calendar year to properly reflect their compensation levels. For non-salaried team members, references to “base salary” refer to the product of their hourly wage rate, including commissions, as applicable, and the average weekly hours they worked. We did not perform any full-time equivalency adjustments or annualize the compensation for temporary or seasonal positions. We did not make any other assumptions, adjustments, exclusions, or estimates with respect to base salary. We also did not make any cost-of-living adjustments or use any statistical sampling.

After identifying the median team member, we calculated this team member’s annual total compensation in the same manner as the CEO’s compensation, which is described in the Summary Compensation Table beginning on page 70.

 

We are a global retailer and approximately 70%67% of our employeesteam members are part-time employees.team members. Our median employeeteam member is a part-time sales associate who worked an average of 1617 hours per week in one of our stores in Hawaii,Fresno, California, and whose annual compensation was $8,241$12,135 in fiscal year 2018.2021. Our Chief Executive Officer’sCEO’s compensation during the same time period was $13,411,422, including $9,446 for a health care benefit under a plan that is available generally to all salaried employees, which is not required to be reported as compensation for our Chief Executive Officer in the Summary Compensation Table, as disclosed on pages 52 through 54, under the SEC rules. See pages 20 through 24 for additional employee data.$14,458,325.

 

 2019 2022 Proxy Statement

6795

 

 

 

 

 

The following table provides informationManagement and the Board understand that how we achieve our purpose is just as important as the results. Stakeholders understandably want to know that the company they are buying from, investing in, working for, or doing business with, is acting responsibly by valuing their team members, giving back to the communities they serve, and actively addressing the environmental impact of February 2, 2019 for compensation plans under which equity securities may be issued:their operations. For these reasons, ESG is embedded in how we manage our business.

 

  (a) (b) (c) 
Plan Category Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
(#)
 Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
($)
 Number of Securities Remaining Available For Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column(a))
(#)
 
Equity Compensation Plans Approved 2,861,447 52.34 11,237,742(1)(2)
by Security Holders       
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved    
by Security Holders       
Total 2,861,447 52.34 11,237,742 

We have long established ESG as a priority for the Company and are continuing to drive accountability to stakeholders, improve the environmental and social impacts of our business, measure the impact we are making, and communicate with our stakeholders.

 

NotesWe also, recognize, however, that this is a journey. We view public reporting as an ongoing process and expect our disclosures to Equity Compensation Plan Tablecontinue to evolve over time. We are fully committed to building on our progress over time and strengthening our vision for a more sustainable world. For additional information regarding our effort to power a more sustainable future, see our Impact Report, which is presented consistent with the SASB reporting standards and TCFD reporting framework and is available at investors.footlocker-inc. com/impactreport.

 

(1)Includes 2,475,669 shares available for future issuance under the ESPP other than upon the exercise of options, warrants, or rights. Participating employees under the ESPP may contribute up to 10% of their annual compensation during a plan year to acquire shares of the Company’s Common Stock at 85% of the lower market price on one of two specified dates in each plan year. In no event may the number of shares purchased on behalf of any one participant in any plan year exceed the number determined by dividing $25,000 by the fair market value of a share on the grant date.

(2)The Stock Incentive Plan currently is the only plan under which stock awards may be granted to directors, officers, and other employees of the Company. Payouts under the LTIP are made in shares of Common Stock and issued as Other Stock-Based Awards under the Stock Incentive Plan.

6896

    Foot Locker, , Inc.Inc. 

 

 

 

 

As described in Proposal 2 above, in accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Exchange Act and the related rules of the SEC, our shareholders have the opportunity to cast a nonbinding, advisory vote to approve the compensation of our NEOs. This Proposal 3 affords shareholders the opportunity to cast an advisory vote on how often we should include a Say-on-Pay proposal in our proxy materials for future annual meetings or any special meeting for which we must include executive compensation information in the proxy statement for that meeting (a “Say-on-Pay Frequency Proposal”). Under this Proposal 3, shareholders may vote to have the Say-on-Pay vote every 1 year, 2 years, or 3 years.

Our shareholders voted on a similar proposal in 2016 with the majority voting to hold the Say-on-Pay vote every 1 year. We continue to believe that Say-on-Pay votes should be conducted every 1 year so that our shareholders may annually express their views on our executive compensation program.

As an advisory vote, this proposal is not binding on the Company, the Board, or the Human Capital Committee. However, the Human Capital Committee and the Board value the opinions expressed by shareholders in their votes on this proposal and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future decisions regarding the frequency of conducting a Say-on-Pay vote.

It is expected that the next vote on a Say-on-Pay Frequency Proposal will occur at the 2028 annual meeting.

98

    Foot Locker, Inc.

 

The Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of the independent registered public accounting firm retained to audit the Company’s financial statements. The Audit Committee conducts an annual evaluation of the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications, performance, and independence. The Audit Committee exercises sole authority to approve all audit engagement fees. In addition to ensuring

The Audit Committee ensures the regular rotation of the lead audit partner, as required by law, thelaw. The Audit Committee is also involved in reviewing, evaluating, and selecting the selection of, and reviews and evaluates, the lead audit partner.

The Audit Committee engages in an evaluation of thenew lead audit partner, and his or her qualifications.based on their qualifications, when the previous lead audit partner is required to rotate off the audit engagement. In evaluating and selecting the Company’sa lead audit partner, the Audit Committee provides selection criteria to KPMG LLP to which KPMG LLP responds with a roster of qualified candidates. Two members of the Audit Committee, along with the Audit Committee Chair of the Committee and the Lead Independent Director, interview the candidates. The Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Accounting Officer also interview the candidates. The Audit Committee Chair of the Committee and proposed lead audit partner meet in executive session. The Audit Committee Chair of the Committee then recommends his selection to the full Audit Committee for its consideration and approval.

 

The Audit Committee has appointed KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 20192022 fiscal year. We are asking shareholders at this meeting to ratify this appointment of KPMG LLP for 2019.2022. KPMG LLP has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since 1995. The Audit Committee and the Board believe that the continued retention of KPMG LLP to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. Although ratification is not required by our By-Laws or otherwise, the Board is submitting the appointment of KPMG LLP to our shareholders for ratification because we value our shareholders’ views regarding this appointment and because we view it as a good corporate governance practice. In the event that shareholders fail to ratify this appointment, it will be considered a recommendation to the Board and the Audit Committee to consider selecting a different firm. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee may in its discretion select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.

 

Representatives of KPMG LLP will be present at the 2019 Annual Meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement and respond to appropriate questions.

 

2022 Proxy Statement

99

✔    PROPOSAL 4: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMThe Board recommends a voteFOR Proposal 3.

 

Audit and Non-Audit FeesAUDIT AND NON-AUDIT FEES

 

The following table shows the fees we paid to KPMG LLP for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements for 20172020 and 2018,2021, as well as the fees billed for other services KPMG LLP provided during these two fiscal years:

 

Category 2017
($)
 2018
($)
Audit Fees(1) 3,438,000 4,378,000
Audit-Related Fees(2) 287,000 245,000
Tax Fees(3) 322,000 294,000
All Other Fees  
Total 4,047,000 4,917,000

Notes to Audit and Non-Audit Fees Table

Category2020
($)
2021
($)
Audit Fees(1)4,056,0005,397,000
Audit-Related Fees(2)324,0003,061,000
Tax Fees(3)304,000515,000
Total4,684,0008,973,000

 

(1)Audit fees consisted of professional services provided in connection with the audit of our annual financial statements, reviews of financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, as well as work generally only the independent auditor can reasonably be expected to provide, such as statutory audits.

 

(2)Audit-related fees consisted principally of audits of financial statements of certain employee benefit plans, and the Foot Locker Foundation, as well asand due diligence related to an investment.certain acquisitions.

 

(3)Tax fees consisted principally of corporate income tax compliance assistance with mattersand tax compliance related to tax compliance.

2019 Proxy Statement    

69

certain acquisitions.

 

Proposal 3: Ratification of the Appointment of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Audit Committee Preapproval Policies and ProceduresAUDIT COMMITTEE PREAPPROVAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

 

The Audit Committee has a policy that all audit and non-audit services to be provided by our independent accountants, including services for our subsidiaries and affiliates, are to be approved in advance by the Audit Committee, regardless of the estimated cost for providing such services. Between meetings of the Audit Committee, theThe Audit Committee has delegated this authority to the Audit Committee Chair. In practice, theseChair to approve fees are normally approved bybetween meetings, and then the Audit Committee Chair andfees are reviewed with the Audit Committee at a subsequent meeting. Management reviews with the Audit Committee at regularly scheduled meetings the total amount and nature of the audit and non-audit services provided by the independent accountants since its prior meeting, including services for our subsidiaries and affiliates, sincewith the Audit Committee’s last meeting.Committee at regularly-scheduled meetings.

100

    Foot Locker, Inc.

PROPOSAL 4: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

Audit Committee ReportAUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

 

In accordance with the charter adopted by the Board, the Audit Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities in the areas of the Company’s accounting policies and practices, andas well as financial reporting. The Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation, and oversight of the independent registered public accounting firm. The Company’s management is responsible for preparing our financial statements and establishing and maintaining adequate internal controlcontrols over financial reporting.

 

The Audit Committee consists of foursix independent directors named below, as independence is defined under the NYSE rules. All of the Audit Committee members meet the expertise requirements under the NYSE rules.

 

The Audit Committee held nine meetings in 2018.2021. At its meetings during 2018,2021, the Audit Committee discussed with management, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm (KPMG LLP), and the Company’s internal auditors the assessment of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee also discussed with KPMG LLP its attestation report and opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting contained in the 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K.Report. The Audit Committee regularly meets privately with KPMG LLP, the internal auditors, and the DirectorVice President of Internal ControlsAudit during the year.

 

The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management and KPMG LLP the audited financial statements for the 20182021 fiscal year, which ended February 2, 2019.January 29, 2022. The Audit Committee also discussed with KPMG LLP the matters required to be discussed by applicable Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”)PCAOB and SEC standards. The Audit Committee, both with and without management present, discussed and reviewed the results of KPMG LLP’s examination of the financial statements and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting.

 

The Audit Committee engages in an annual evaluation of the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications. In evaluating and selecting the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee considered, among other things:

 

historical and recent performance of the current independent audit firm;

 

an analysis of known significant legal or regulatory proceedings related to the firm;

 

external data on audit quality and performance, including PCAOB reports;

 

industry experience;

 

audit fee revenues;

 

firm capabilities and audit approach; and

 

the independence, tenure, and partner rotation of the audit firm.

 

The Audit Committee also considers the advisability and potential impact of selecting a different independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee obtained from KPMG LLP the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable PCAOB requirements regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with KPMG LLP its independence and any relationships that may affect its objectivity. The Audit Committee also considered whether the non-audit services provided to the Company by KPMG LLP to the Company are compatible with maintaining KPMG LLP’s independence. The Audit Committee has satisfied itself that KPMG LLP is independent.

 

As a result of this evaluation, the Audit Committee approved the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending February 1, 2020,January 29, 2022, subject to shareholder ratification.

 

Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in the 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K.Report.

 

Members of the Audit Committee

 

 
     
 GUILLERMO G.VIRGINIA C.MATTHEW M.DARLENEULICEDONA D.
Guillermo G. Marmol, ChairMARMOLDROSOSMCKENNANICOSIAPAYNE, JR.YOUNG
 Matthew M. McKenna Ulice Payne, Jr. 
Dona D. YoungChairMemberMemberMemberMemberMember

 

2022 Proxy Statement

70101

Foot Locker , Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

Directors and Executive OfficersDIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

 

The table below shows the number of shares of Common Stock reported to us as beneficially owned by each of our directors and NEOs, as of March 25, 2019, and by all directors, NEOs, and other executive officers as a group, as of that date,the Record Date, including shares of Common Stock that they have a right to acquire within 60 days after March 25, 2019the Record Date by the exercise of stock options.

 

Mr. Johnson beneficially owned 1.5% of the total number of outstanding shares of Common Stock as of the Record Date. No other director or NEO beneficially owned 1% or more of the total number of outstanding shares as of March 25, 2019.the Record Date. Each person has sole voting and investment power for the number of shares shown, unlessexcept as otherwise noted.noted below:

 

Name Common Stock
Beneficially Owned
Excluding
Stock Options
(#)(a)
 Stock Options
Exercisable Within
60 Days After
3/25/19
(#)
 RSUs and
DSUs
(#)(b)
 Total
(#)
 
Maxine Clark 13,150  1,555 14,705 
Alan D. Feldman 65,498  29,834 95,332 
Stephen D. “Jake” Jacobs 77,449 111,919  189,368 
Richard A. Johnson 294,589 739,782  1,034,371 
Lewis P. Kimble 39,834 93,839  133,673 
Guillermo G. Marmol 32,702  1,555 34,257 
Matthew M. McKenna 30,459  1,555 32,014 
Steven Oakland 10,816  3,137 13,953 
Ulice Payne, Jr. 1,329  1,555 2,884 
Lauren B. Peters 143,527 248,652  392,179 
Cheryl Nido Turpin 47,941  46,865 94,806 
Kimberly Underhill 1,329  1,555 2,884 
Pawan Verma 66,189 39,277  105,466 
Dona D. Young 42,527  66,334 108,861 
All 21 directors and executive officers as a group, 1,036,412 1,471,168 153,945 2,661,525(c)
including the NEOs         
NameCommon Stock
Beneficially Owned
Excluding Stock
Options
(#)(1)
Stock Options
Exercisable Within
60 Days After
3/21/22
(#)
DSUs, RSUs,
and PSUs
(#)(2)
Total
(#)
Bracken4,02236,59919,12359,744
Drosos
Feldman76,27431,739108,013
Gray7,62665,87113,71087,207
Johnson344,206974,230105,9481,424,384
Marmol44,4081,13645,544
Martin28,27182,38419,841130,496
McKenna12,0081,13613,144
Nicosia6,0451,5697,614
Oakland17,9837,11725,100
Page2,77715,72518,502
Payne13,2972,45015,747
Peters145,601(3)194,55337,048377,202
Talwar17,263(3)7,43324,696
Underhill15,4431,13616,579
Walker4,8292,3737,202
Young49,51576,659126,174
All 25 directors and executive officers as a group, including the NEOs927,2201,640,476402,3012,969,997(4)

 

(a)(1)This column includes shares held in the Company’s 401(k) Plan and, where applicable, executives’ unvested time-based RSUs over which they have sole voting power but no investment power, as follows:Plan.

NameUnvested RSUs
(#)
R. Johnson25,123
L. Peters29,839
S. Jacobs37,263
L. Kimble26,146
P. Verma50,463

(b)(2)This column includes the number of(a) DSUs credited as of March 25, 2019 to the accounts of the directors who elected to defer all or part of their annual retainer fee.fee, (b) executives’ unvested RSUs, and (c) earned but unvested PSUs. The DSUs, RSUs, and PSUs do not have current voting or investment power.

(c)(3)This information is based on the last beneficial ownership reports filed on behalf of Ms. Peters and Mr. Talwar with the SEC on March 30, 2021 and May 17, 2021, respectively, and also includes 7,209 RSUs that were accelerated in connection with Ms. Peters’s departure.

(4)This number represents approximately 2.4%3.1% of the shares of Common Stock outstanding at the close of business on March 25, 2019.

2019 Proxy Statement    

71

the Record Date.

 

102

    Foot Locker, Inc.

 

 

Beneficial Ownership of the Company’s StockShare ownership

 

Persons Owning More Than Five-Percent of the Company’s Common StockPRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS

 

The table below provides information on shareholders who beneficially owned more than 5% of our Common Stock as of December 31, 20182021 according to reports filed with the SEC. To the best of our knowledge, there are no other shareholders who beneficially own more than 5% of a class of the Company’s voting securities.

 

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership
(#)
 Percent of Class 
The Vanguard Group, Inc. 12,206,275(a) 10.81%(a)
100 Vanguard Boulevard      
Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355      
AQR Capital Management, LLC and 7,055,107(b) 6.25%(b)
AQR Capital Management Holdings, LLC      
Two Greenwich Plaza      
Greenwich, Connecticut 06830      
BlackRock, Inc. 7,046,767(c) 6.2%(c)
55 East 52nd Street      
New York, New York 10055      
Name and Address of Beneficial OwnerAmount and Nature
of Beneficial Ownership
(#)
Percent
of Class
(%)
Vesa Equity Investment S.à r.l., EP Investment S.à r.l., and Daniel Křetínský12,750,317(a)12.9(a)
39 Avenue John F. Kennedy
L-1855 Luxembourg, Luxembourg
The Vanguard Group, Inc.11,309,861(b)11.27(b)
100 Vanguard Boulevard
Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355
BlackRock, Inc.7,742,626(c)7.7(c)
55 East 52nd Street
New York, New York 10055
FMR LLC8,622,922(d)8.591(d)
245 Summer Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02210
Boston Partners5,474,042(e)5.45(e)
One Beacon Street, 30th Floor
Boston, Massachusetts 02108

 

(a)Reflects shares beneficially owned as of July 14, 2021 according to Form 4 filed with the SEC. As reported in this Form 4, Vesa Equity Investment S.à r.l. is the record holder of the reported shares of Common Stock. The principal shareholder of Vesa Equity Investment S.à r.l. is EP Investment S.à r.l., the ultimate beneficial owner of which is Daniel Křetínský. Each of Mr. Křetínský and EP Investment S.à r.l. may be deemed to hold shared voting power with respect to 12,750,317 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 12,750,317 shares, and to be an indirect beneficial owner of the shares owned by Vesa Equity Investment S.à r.l.

(b)Reflects shares beneficially owned as of December 31, 20182021 according to Amendment No. 812 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC. As reported in this schedule, The Vanguard Group, an investment adviser, holds soleshared voting power with respect to 110,21156,593 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 12,088,69011,180,393 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to 117,585129,468 shares. Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc., is the beneficial owner of 97,750 shares as a result of its serving as investment manager of collective trust accounts. Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc., is the beneficial owner of 30,761 shares as a result of its serving as investment manager of Australian investment offerings.

(b)(c)Reflects shares beneficially owned as of December 31, 2018 according to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC. As reported in this schedule, AQR Capital Management, LLC, an investment adviser, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of AQR Capital Management Holdings, LLC. Each of AQR Capital Management, LLC and AQR Capital Management Holdings, LLC holds shared voting power and shared dispositive power with respect to 7,055,107 shares.

(c)Reflects shares beneficially owned as of December 31, 20182021 according to Amendment No. 913 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC. As reported in this schedule, BlackRock, Inc., a parent holding company, holds sole voting power with respect to 6,284,5547,434,875 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 7,046,7677,742,626 shares.

(d)Reflects shares beneficially owned as of December 31, 2021 according to Amendment No. 1 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC. As reported in this schedule, FMR LLC holds sole voting power with respect to 1,024,117 shares. Each of Crosby Advisors LLC, FIAM LLC, Fidelity Institutional Asset Management Trust Company, Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC, Fidelity Management Trust Company, and Strategic Advisers LLC beneficially own shares. Abigail P. Johnson is a Director, the Chairman, and the Chief Executive Officer of FMR LLC. Neither FMR LLC nor Ms. Johnson has the sole power to vote or direct the voting of the shares owned directly by the various investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act (“Fidelity Funds”) advised by Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC (“FMR Co. LLC”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of FMR LLC, which power resides with the Fidelity Funds’ Boards of Trustees. FMR Co. LLC carries out the voting of the shares under written guidelines established by the Fidelity Funds’ Boards of Trustees.

(e)Reflects shares beneficially owned as of December 30, 2021 according to Amendment No. 1 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC. As reported in this schedule, Boston Partners, an investment adviser, holds sole voting power with respect to 4,089,913 shares, shared voting power with respect to 9,361 shares, and sole dispositive power with respect to 5,474,042 shares.

 

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires that our directors, executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of the Company’s Common Stock file reports of ownership and changes in ownership of the Company’s Common Stock with the SEC. Based solely on our review of copies of such forms furnished to the Company and written representations that no other reports were required during the 2018 fiscal year, we believe that during the 2018 fiscal year, the persons subject to Section 16(a) reporting complied with all applicable SEC filing requirements, except as previously disclosed in the 2018 Proxy Statement.

2022 Proxy Statement

72103

Foot Locker , Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

Proposals for Inclusion in our 2020 Proxy Materials

Under SEC Rule 14a-8, if a shareholder would like us to include a proposal in our proxy statement and form of proxy for the 2020 Annual Meeting, our Secretary must receive the proposal at our corporate headquarters at 330 West 34th Street, New York, New York 10001 no later than December 14, 2019 in order to be considered for inclusion in the 2020 proxy statement.

Director Nominations for Inclusion in our 2020 Proxy Materials (Proxy Access)

Under our proxy access by-law, a shareholder, or a group of up to 20 shareholders, owning at least 3% of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock continuously for at least three years as of the date of the notice of nomination, may nominate and include in the Company’s proxy materials director nominees constituting up to two individuals or 20% of the Board, whichever is greater (subject to certain limitations set forth in the By-Laws), provided that the shareholder(s) and nominee(s) satisfy the requirements specified in the By-Laws. Our Secretary must receive the notice of a proxy access nomination for the 2020 Annual Meeting at our corporate headquarters at 330 West 34th Street, New York, New York 10001 no earlier than November 14, 2019 and no later than December 14, 2019. You should carefully review the requirements specified in the Company’s By-Laws, which are available on the corporate governance section of the Company’s corporate website atfootlocker.com/corp. You may also obtain a printed copy of the By-Laws by writing to the Secretary at the Company’s headquarters.

Other Proposals or Nominations for the 2020 Annual Meeting

For any shareholder proposal that is not submitted under SEC Rule 14a-8, and any nomination of directors not submitted pursuant to our proxy access by-law provision, our By-Laws describe the procedures that must be followed. Under these procedures, we must receive notice of a shareholder’s intention to introduce a nomination or proposed item of business for an annual meeting not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days before the first anniversary of the prior year’s annual meeting. For the 2020 Annual Meeting, we must receive this notice no earlier than January 23, 2020 and no later than February 22, 2020, assuming that our 2020 Annual Meeting is held on schedule. However, if we hold the 2020 annual meeting on a date that is not within 25 days before or after the first anniversary of the prior year’s Annual Meeting, then we must receive the notice no later than ten days after the earlier of the date we first provide notice of the meeting to shareholders or announce it publicly. Proposals for nomination for directors and other items of business should be addressed to the Secretary, 330 West 34th Street, New York, New York 10001 and must contain the information specified in the Company’s By-Laws, which are available on the corporate governance section of our corporate website atfootlocker.com/corp or from the Secretary. 

 

Nominations and
Shareholder Proposals
2019ProcedureDeadline
Proposals for
Inclusion in Our 2023
Proxy Materials
Under SEC Rule 14a-8, if a shareholder would like us to include a proposal in our Proxy Statement and form of proxy for the 2023 annual meeting, our Secretary must receive the proposal at our Corporate Headquarters in order to be considered for inclusion in the 2023 proxy statement.

73

December 9, 2022
Director Nominations
for Inclusion in Our
2023 Proxy Materials
(Proxy Access)
Under our proxy access by-law, a shareholder, or a group of up to 20 shareholders, owning at least 3% of the outstanding Common Stock continuously for at least three years as of the date of the notice of nomination, may nominate and include in the Company’s proxy materials director nominees constituting up to two individuals or 20% of the Board, whichever is greater (subject to certain limitations set forth in the By-Laws), provided that the shareholder(s) and nominee(s) satisfy the requirements specified in the By-Laws. Notices of proxy access nomination for the 2023 annual meeting should be addressed to our Secretary at our Corporate Headquarters. You should carefully review the requirements specified in the By-Laws, which are available at investors.footlocker-inc.com/by-laws.No earlier than November 9, 2022 and no later than December 9, 2022
Other Proposals or
Nominations for the
2023 Annual Meeting
For any shareholder proposal that is not submitted under SEC Rule 14a-8, and any nomination of directors not submitted pursuant to our proxy access by-law provision, our By-Laws describe the procedures that must be followed. Proposals for nomination for directors and other items of business should be addressed to our Secretary at our Corporate Headquarters and must contain the information specified in the By-Laws, which are available at investors.footlocker-inc. com/by-laws.No earlier than January 18, 2023 and no later than February 17, 2023. However, if we hold the 2023 annual meeting on a date that is not within 25 days before or after the first anniversary of the prior year’s annual meeting, then we must receive the notice no later than ten days after the earlier of the date we first provide notice of the meeting to shareholders or announce it publicly.

 

 

Q:What is included in these proxy materials?

A:The proxy materials include our 2019 Proxy Statement and 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K. If you received printed copies of these materials by mail, these materials also include the proxy card for the 2019 Annual Meeting.

Q:May I obtain an additional copy of the 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K?

A:You may obtain an additional copy of our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K without charge by writing to our Investor Relations Department at Foot Locker, Inc., 330 West 34th Street, New York, New York 10001. It is also available free of charge through our corporate website atfootlocker.com/corp.

Q:What constitutes a quorum for the Annual Meeting?

A:We will have a quorum and will be able to conduct the business of the Annual Meeting if the holders of a majority of the shares outstanding and entitled to vote are present at the meeting, either in person or by proxy. We will count abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, as present and entitled to vote in determining whether we have a quorum.

Q:Who may vote at the Annual Meeting?

A:Only shareholders of record on the books of the Company as of March 25, 2019 (the record date) are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements of the meeting on the items of business described in this Proxy Statement. There were 112,310,616 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of March 25, 2019. Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote.

Q:Can I vote shares held in employee plans?

A:If you hold shares of the Company’s Common Stock through the Foot Locker 401(k) Plan or the Foot Locker Puerto Rico 1165(e) Plan, your proxy card includes the number of shares allocated to your plan account. Your proxy card will serve as a voting instruction card for these shares for the plan trustee to vote the shares. The trustee will vote only those shares for which voting instructions have been given. To allow sufficient time for voting by the trustees of these plans, your voting instructions must be received by 11:59 p.m. EDT on May 19, 2019.

Q:What proposals are shareholders voting on at this meeting and what are the voting recommendations of the Board and the vote requirements to approve the proposals?

A:The proposals that you are being asked to vote on at the Annual Meeting, our Board’s voting recommendations, and the vote required to approve each proposal are as follows:

ProposalBoard’s Voting
Recommendation
Vote Required to Approve
Elect ten members to the Board to serve for one-year termsFOReach nomineeMajority of Votes Cast by Shareholders
Approve, on an advisory basis, our NEOs’ compensationFORMajority of Votes Cast by Shareholders
Ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2019 fiscal yearFORMajority of Votes Cast by Shareholders

Q:Could other matters be voted on at the Annual Meeting?

A:We do not know of any other business that will be presented at the 2019 Annual Meeting. If any other matters are properly brought before the meeting for consideration, then the persons named as proxies will have the discretion to vote on those matters for you using their best judgment.

74

Foot Locker , Inc.

Questions and Answers about this Annual Meeting and Voting

Q:What happens if I do not vote my shares?

A:This depends on how you hold your shares and the type of proposal. If you hold your shares in “street name,” such as through a bank or brokerage account, it is important that you cast your vote if you want it to count for Proposals 1 and 2. If you do not instruct your bank or broker regarding how to vote your shares, no votes will be cast on your behalf on Proposals 1 and 2 because the broker does not have discretionary authority to vote. This is called a “broker non-vote.” Your bank or broker will have discretion to vote any uninstructed shares on Proposal 3.

If you are a “shareholder of record,” meaning your stock ownership is reflected directly on the books and records of the Company’s transfer agent, or if you hold your shares through the Foot Locker 401(k) Plan or Foot Locker 1165(e) Plan, no votes will be cast on your behalf on any of the proposals if you do not cast your vote.

Q:How will the votes be counted?

A:Votes will be counted and certified by an independent inspector of election.

If you abstain from voting or there is a broker non-vote on any matter, your abstention or broker non-vote will not affect the outcome of such vote because abstentions and broker non-votes are not considered to be votes cast.

Q:Can I change my mind after voting my shares?

A:Yes, you may revoke your proxy at any time before it is used by:

sending a written notice to the Secretary at the Company’s corporate headquarters,

delivering a valid proxy card with a later date,

providing a later-dated vote by telephone or internet, or

voting by ballot at the Annual Meeting.

Q:Will my vote be confidential?

A:Yes, we maintain the confidentiality of our shareholders’ votes. All proxy cards, electronic voting, voting instructions, ballots, and voting tabulations identifying shareholders are kept confidential from the Company, except:

as necessary to satisfy any applicable legal requirements,

when a shareholder requests disclosure or writes a comment on a proxy card,

in a contested proxy solicitation, and

to allow independent inspectors of election to tabulate and certify the vote.

Q:Do I need an admission ticket or proof of share ownership to attend the Annual Meeting?

A:Yes, attendance at the meeting will be limited to shareholders as of March 25, 2019 (or their authorized representatives) having an admission ticket or proof of their share ownership, and guests of the Company. If you plan to attend the meeting, please indicate this when you vote, and we will promptly mail an admission ticket to you.

If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker, or other holder of record and you plan to attend the meeting, you can obtain an admission ticket in advance by providing proof of your ownership, such as a brokerage account statement, to the Secretary at Foot Locker, Inc., 330 West 34th Street, New York, New York 10001. If you do not have an admission ticket, you must show proof of your ownership of the Company’s Common Stock at the registration table at the Annual Meeting.

Q:Who pays the cost of this proxy solicitation?

A:We will pay for the cost of the solicitation of proxies, including the preparation, printing, and mailing of the proxy materials.

Proxies may be solicited, without additional compensation, by our directors, officers, or employees by mail, telephone, facsimile, in person, or otherwise. We will request banks, brokers, and other custodians, nominees, and fiduciaries to deliver proxy materials to the beneficial owners of the Company’s Common Stock and obtain their voting instructions, and we will reimburse those firms for their expenses under both SEC and NYSE rules. In addition, we have retained Innisfree M&A Incorporated to assist us in the solicitation of proxies for a fee of $12,500 plus out-of-pocket expenses.

2019 Proxy Statement    

75

Questions and Answers about this Annual Meeting and Voting

Q:Why did I receive a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials but no proxy materials?

A:We are furnishing proxy materials to our shareholders primarily over the internet under the SEC’s notice and access rules instead of mailing full sets of the printed materials. We believe that this procedure reduces costs, provides greater flexibility to our shareholders, and lessens the environmental impact of our Annual Meeting. On or about April 12, 2019, we started mailing a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Foot Locker Notice”) to most of our shareholders in the United States. The Foot Locker Notice contains instructions on how to access and read our 2019 Proxy Statement and our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K on the internet and to vote online. If you received a Foot Locker Notice by mail, you will not receive paper copies of the proxy materials in the mail, unless you request them. If you received a Foot Locker Notice by mail and would like to receive a printed copy of the materials, please follow the instructions on the Foot Locker Notice for requesting the materials, and we will promptly mail the materials to you.

We are mailing to shareholders, or making available to shareholders via the internet, this Proxy Statement, form of proxy card, and our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K on or about April 12, 2019.

Q:What is “householding” and how does it affect me?

A:The Company has adopted the “householding” procedure approved by the SEC, which allows us to deliver one set of documents to a household of shareholders instead of delivering a set to each shareholder in a household, unless we have been instructed otherwise. This procedure is more environmentally friendly and cost-effective because it reduces the number of copies to be printed and mailed. Shareholders who receive proxy materials in paper form will continue to receive separate proxy cards/voting instruction forms to vote their shares. Shareholders who receive the Foot Locker Notice will receive instructions on submitting their proxy cards/voting instruction form via the internet.

If you would like to change your householding election, request that a single copy of the proxy materials be sent to your address, or request a separate copy of the proxy materials, please contact Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., by calling (866) 540-7095 or by writing to Broadridge Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717. We will promptly deliver the proxy materials to you upon receipt of your request. If you hold your shares in street name, please contact your bank, broker, or other record holder to request information about householding.

Q:Where is the location of the 2019 Annual Meeting?

A:The annual meeting will be held at NYC33, 125 West 33rd Street, New York, New York 10001 (located between 6th Avenue and 7th Avenue).

 

Directions

By subway

Take any of these subway lines: the A, B, C, D, E, F, M, N, Q, R, or W, or the Number 1, 2, or 3 trains to 34th Street. The A, C, E, 1, 2, and 3 trains stop at 34th Street-Penn Station. The B, D, F, M, N, Q, R, and W trains stop at 34th Street-Herald Square. NYC33 is on the north side of 33rd Street between 6th Avenue and 7th Avenue.

By car

NYC33 is on the north side of 33rd Street between 6th Avenue and 7th Avenue.

By Order of the Board of Directors

 

SheilaghSHEILAGH M. ClarkeCLARKE

Senior
Executive Vice President,

General Counsel and Secretary
April 8, 2022

 

April 12, 2019


76104

    Foot Locker, , Inc.Inc. 

 

 

 

 

 

Q:What constitutes a quorum for the Annual Meeting?

A:We will have a quorum and be able to conduct the business of the Annual Meeting if the holders of a majority of the shares outstanding and entitled to vote are present at the meeting, either in person or by proxy. We will count abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, as present and entitled to vote in determining whether we have a quorum.

Q:Who may vote at the Annual Meeting?

A:Only shareholders of record on the books of the Company as of the Record Date are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, and any adjournments or postponements of the meeting, on the items of business described in this Proxy Statement. There were 96,089,997 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of the Record Date. Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote.

Q:Can I vote shares held in employee plans?

A:If you hold shares of Common Stock through the 401(k) Plan or the 1165(e) Plan, your proxy card includes the number of shares allocated to your plan account. Your proxy card will serve as a VIF for these shares for the plan trustee to vote the shares. The trustee will vote only those shares for which voting instructions have been given. To allow sufficient time for voting by the trustees of these plans, your voting instructions must be received by 11:59 p.m. EDT on May 15, 2022.

Q:Could matters be voted on at the Annual Meeting other than the proposals on page 1?

A:We do not know of any other business that will be presented at the Annual Meeting. If any other matters are properly brought before the meeting for consideration, then the persons named as proxies will have the discretion to vote on those matters for you using their best judgment.

Q:What happens if I do not vote my shares?

A:This depends on how you hold your shares and the type of proposal. If you hold your shares in “street name,” such as through a bank or brokerage account, it is important that you cast your vote if you want it to count for Proposals 1, 2, and 3. If you do not instruct your bank or broker regarding how to vote your shares, no votes will be cast on your behalf on Proposals 1, 2, and 3 because the broker does not have discretionary authority to vote. This is called a “broker non-vote.” Your bank or broker will have discretion to vote any uninstructed shares on Proposal 4.

If you are a “shareholder of record,” meaning your stock ownership is reflected directly on the books and records of the Company’s transfer agent, or if you hold your shares through the 401(k) Plan or 1165(e) Plan, no votes will be cast on your behalf on any of the proposals if you do not cast your vote.

Q:How will the votes be counted?

A:Votes will be counted and certified by an independent inspector of election.

If you abstain from voting or there is a broker non-vote on any matter, your abstention or broker non-vote will not affect the outcome of such vote because abstentions and broker non-votes are not considered to be votes cast.

Q:Can I change my mind after voting my shares?

A:Yes, you may revoke your proxy at any time before it is used by:

sending a written notice to our Secretary at our Corporate Headquarters,

delivering a valid proxy card with a later date,

providing a later-dated vote by telephone, scanning, internet, or app, or

voting at the Annual Meeting.

Q:How do I attend the Annual Meeting?

A:We are pleased to welcome shareholders to the Annual Meeting. The Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual format only to provide a safe experience for our shareholders and team members. All shareholders will be afforded the same rights they would have had at a physical meeting.

 

2022 Proxy Statement

105

 

 

Frequently Asked Questions

The live audio webcast of the meeting will begin promptly at 9:00 a.m. EDT. Online access to the audio webcast will open shortly prior to the start of the meeting to allow time for you to log-in and test your device’s audio system. We encourage you to access the meeting in advance of the designated start time. A support line will be available on the meeting website shortly prior to, and during, the meeting to assist shareholders with any technical difficulties they may have accessing or hearing the meeting.

To be admitted to the Annual Meeting, you will need to log-in to virtualshareholdermeeting.com/FL2022 using the 16-digit control number found on your Notice, proxy card, VIF, or email previously sent to shareholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

Even if you plan on attending the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to vote your shares in advance using one of the methods described in this Proxy Statement to ensure that your vote will be represented at the Annual Meeting.

Q:Will there be a question and answer session at the Annual Meeting?

A:Shareholders may submit a question in advance of the meeting by emailing the Company at ir@footlocker.com. Live questions may be submitted online shortly prior to, and during, the Annual Meeting by logging in with the 16-digit control number at virtualshareholdermeeting.com/FL2022. We will answer questions during the meeting that are pertinent to the Company as time permits and in accordance with our rules of conduct for the Annual Meeting, which will be available on the virtual meeting website. Questions and answers may be grouped by topic and substantially similar questions may be grouped and answered once.

Answers to any pertinent questions that are not addressed during the meeting may be published following the meeting on our corporate website at footlocker.com/corp.

Q:Will the Annual Meeting be available for replay?

A:A replay of the Annual Meeting will be made publicly available approximately 24 hours after the Annual Meeting at virtualshareholdermeeting.com/FL2022. The replay will be available for one year.

Q:Who pays the cost of this proxy solicitation?

A:The Company will pay for the cost of the solicitation of proxies, including the preparation, printing, and mailing of the proxy materials.

Proxies may be solicited, without additional compensation, by our directors, officers, or team members by mail, telephone, facsimile, in person, or otherwise. We will request banks, brokers, and other custodians, nominees, and fiduciaries to deliver proxy materials to the beneficial owners of the Common Stock and obtain their voting instructions, and we will reimburse those firms for their expenses under both SEC and NYSE rules. In addition, we have retained Innisfree M&A Incorporated to assist us in the solicitation of proxies for a fee of $15,000 plus out-of-pocket expenses.

Q:Why did I receive a notice but no proxy materials?

A:We are furnishing proxy materials to our shareholders primarily over the internet under the SEC’s notice and access rules instead of mailing full sets of the printed materials. We believe that this procedure reduces costs, provides greater flexibility to our shareholders, and decreases the environmental impact of our Annual Meeting. For additional information regarding our commitment to the environment, see our Global Environmental and Climate Change Statement available at investors.footlocker-inc.com/climate. On or about April 8, 2022, we started mailing a Notice to most of our shareholders in the United States. The Notice contains instructions on how to access our Proxy Statement and Annual Report on the internet and vote online. If you received a Notice, you will not receive paper copies of the proxy materials, unless you request them. If you received a Notice and would like to receive paper copies of the proxy materials, please follow the instructions on the Notice for requesting the materials, and we will promptly mail the materials to you.

We are mailing to shareholders, or making available to shareholders via the internet, this Proxy Statement, form of proxy card, and our Annual Report on or about April 8, 2022.

Q:What is “householding” and how does it affect me?

A:The Company has adopted the “householding” procedure approved by the SEC, which allows us to deliver one set of documents to a household of shareholders instead of delivering a set to each shareholder in a household, unless we have been instructed otherwise. This procedure is more environmentally friendly and cost-effective because it reduces the number of copies to be printed and mailed. Shareholders who receive proxy materials in paper form will continue to receive separate proxy cards/VIFs to vote their shares. Shareholders who receive the Notice will get instructions on submitting their proxy cards/VIF via the internet.

If you would like to change your householding election, request that a single copy of the proxy materials be sent to your address, or request a separate copy of the proxy materials, please contact Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. using their contact information provided under Helpful Resources on page 107. We will promptly deliver the proxy materials to you upon receipt of your request. If you hold your shares in street name, please contact your bank, broker, or other record holder to request information about householding.

106

    Foot Locker, Inc.

 

Annual Meetingvirtualshareholdermeeting.com/FL2022
Board of Directors
Boardinvestors.footlocker-inc.com/board
Committeesinvestors.footlocker-inc.com/bcommittees
Committee Charters
Audit Committeeinvestors.footlocker-inc.com/audit
Finance Committeeinvestors.footlocker-inc.com/finance
Human Capital Committeeinvestors.footlocker-inc.com/comp
Responsibility Committeeinvestors.footlocker-inc.com/gov
ESG
Impact Reportinvestors.footlocker-inc.com/impactreport
Financial Reporting
Annual Reportinvestors.footlocker-inc.com/ar
Foot Locker, Inc.
Corporate Websitefootlocker.com/corp
Leadership Teaminvestors.footlocker-inc.com/management
Investor Relationsinvestors.footlocker-inc.com/ir
Governance Documents
Anti-Corruption Policyinvestors.footlocker-inc.com/acp
By-Lawsinvestors.footlocker-inc.com/by-laws
Certificate of Incorporationinvestors.footlocker-inc.com/coi
Code of Business Conductinvestors.footlocker-inc.com/cobc
Code of Business Conduct Waiversinvestors.footlocker-inc.com/cobcwaivers
Conflict Minerals Policyinvestors.footlocker-inc.com/conflictminerals
Corporate Governance Guidelinesinvestors.footlocker-inc.com/cgg
Global Environmental and Climate Change Statementinvestors.footlocker-inc.com/climate
Global Human Rights Statementinvestors.footlocker-inc.com/humanrights
Global Occupational Health and Safety Statementinvestors.footlocker-inc.com/safety
Global Sourcing Guidelinesinvestors.footlocker-inc.com/gsg
Global Water Stewardship Statementinvestors.footlocker-inc.com/water
Procedures for Communications with the Boardinvestors.footlocker-inc.com/boardcomms
Contacts

To Request Copies of our Annual Report, Committee Charters, or Governance Documents

Company Contacts

Board or General Counsel and Secretary
sclarke@footlocker.com

Investor Relations
ir@footlocker.com

or mail to our Corporate Headquarters,
attention to the applicable contact

Corporate Headquarters

Foot Locker, Inc.
330 West 34th Street
New York, New York 10001
212-720-3700

To Request Copies of the Internet Notice or Proxy Materials

Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
(Tabulator/Inspector of Election)
proxyvote.com
sendmaterial@proxyvote.com

800-579-1639

To Change Your Householding Election

Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
Householding Department
51 Mercedes Way
Edgewood, New York 11717

For Questions or Assistance Voting

Innisfree M&A Incorporated
(Proxy Solicitor)

Shareholders in the United States and Canada: 877-750-2689 Shareholders in all other locations: 412-232-3651
Banks and brokers: 212-750-5833



2022 Proxy Statement

107

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This page intentionally left blank.

 

 

 

 

Y O U R   V O T E   I S   V E R Y   I M P O R T A N T
P L E A S E   V O T E   Y O U R   P R O X Y
 

 

Thank you

 

for being a shareholder and for
your trust in Foot Locker, Inc.

 

 

 

 

 (GRAPHIC)  

 



FOOT LOCKER, INC.
330 WEST 34TH STREET
NEW YORK, NYNEW YORK 10001
(GRAPHIC)

 

VOTE BY INTERNET

Before The Meeting- Go to www.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

During The Meeting - Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/FL2022

You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions. 

 

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

 

VOTE BY MAIL 

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NYNew York 11717.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
E65654-P16270-Z73729D67373-P64618KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.
      
FOOT LOCKER, INC.   
    
AProposals - The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR EACH NOMINEE each of the nominees, FOR Proposal 2, 1 Year for Director in Proposal 1.3, and FOR Proposal 4.   
     
1. Election ofElect Ten Directors to the Board to Serve for One-Year Terms. 
      
  Nominees:ForAgainst WithholdAbstain
      
  1a.Maxine ClarkVirginia C. Drosos[GRAPHIC][GRAPHIC]
      
  1b.Alan D. Feldman[GRAPHIC][GRAPHIC][GRAPHIC]
      
  1c.Richard A. Johnson[GRAPHIC][GRAPHIC][GRAPHIC]
      
  1d.Guillermo G. Marmol[GRAPHIC][GRAPHIC][GRAPHIC]
      
  1e.Matthew M. McKennaDarlene Nicosia[GRAPHIC][GRAPHIC][GRAPHIC]
      
  1f.Steven Oakland[GRAPHIC][GRAPHIC][GRAPHIC]
      
  1g.Ulice Payne, Jr.[GRAPHIC][GRAPHIC][GRAPHIC]
      
  1h.Cheryl Nido TurpinKimberly Underhill[GRAPHIC][GRAPHIC][GRAPHIC]
      
  1i.Kimberly UnderhillTristan Walker[GRAPHIC][GRAPHIC][GRAPHIC]
      
  1j.Dona D. Young[GRAPHIC][GRAPHIC][GRAPHIC]
  
  
  
  
  
     
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR Proposals 2 and 3.ForAgainstAbstain
    
2.Vote, on an Advisory Approval ofBasis, to Approve the Company’sCompany's Named Executive Officers' Compensation.[GRAPHIC][GRAPHIC][GRAPHIC]
1 Year2 Years3 YearsAbstain
     
3.Ratification ofVote, on an Advisory Basis, on whether the Shareholder Vote to Approve the Company's Named Executive Officers' Compensation Should Occur Every 1, 2, or 3 Years.[GRAPHIC] [GRAPHIC][GRAPHIC][GRAPHIC]
ForAgainstAbstain
4.Ratify the Appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company's Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.Firm for the 2022 Fiscal Year.[GRAPHIC][GRAPHIC][GRAPHIC]
     
NOTE:Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.   
    
    
    
 
For address changes and/or comments, please check this box and write them on the back where indicated.
    
Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting.[GRAPHIC][GRAPHIC] 
    
 YesNo 

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.

 

  
  
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]Date
  
  

Signature (Joint Owners)

Date

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:

The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report with Form 10-K are available atwww.proxyvote.com.

 

E65655-P16270-Z73729

D67374-P64618

        
 

FOOT LOCKER, INC.

Annual Meeting of Shareholders
May 22, 201918, 2022 at 9:00 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time

 
 

This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors of Foot Locker, Inc.

 
       
 

Andrew E. Page, Sheilagh M. Clarke, and John A. Maurer, and Lauren B. Peters, or any of them, each with the power of substitution, are hereby authorized to vote the shares of the undersigned at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Foot Locker, Inc., to be held on May 22, 2019,18, 2022, at 9:00 A.M., local time, virtually at NYC33, 125 West 33rd Street, New York, New York 10001,www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/FL2022, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof, upon the matters set forth in Foot Locker, Inc.’s's Proxy Statement and upon such other matters as may properly come before the Annual Meeting, voting as specified on the reverse side of this card with respect to the matters set forth in the Proxy Statement, and voting in the discretion of the above-named persons on such other matters as may properly come before the Annual Meeting.

 
       
 

IF YOU ARE NOT VOTING BY TELEPHONE OR INTERNET, PLEASE SIGN AND DATE THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS PROXY CARD AND PROMPTLY RETURN IT IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. THE PERSONS NAMED ABOVE AS PROXIES CANNOT VOTE THE SHARES UNLESS YOU SIGN AND RETURN THIS CARD OR VOTE BY TELEPHONE OR INTERNET. YOU MAY SPECIFY YOUR CHOICES BY MARKING THE APPROPRIATE BOXES, BUT YOU NEED NOT MARK ANY BOX IF YOU WISH TO VOTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS’DIRECTORS' RECOMMENDATIONS.

 
   
 EMPLOYEE PLANS 
 IF YOU ARE A PARTICIPANT IN THE FOOT LOCKER 401(k) PLAN OR THE FOOT LOCKER PUERTO RICO 1165(e) PLAN, BY SIGNING AND RETURNING THIS PROXY CARD (OR VOTING BY TELEPHONE OR INTERNET), YOU WILL AUTHORIZE THE PLAN TRUSTEES TO VOTE THOSE SHARES ALLOCATED TO YOUR ACCOUNT AS YOU HAVE DIRECTED. 
   
         
   Address Changes/Comments:     
        
         
         
         
  
 (If you noted any Address Changes/Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.) 
   
 Continued and to be signed on reverse side 
       

 

 

 

 

VOTING INSTRUCTIONS
As the record holder for your shares, we will vote your shares based on your instructions.
Please provide us with your voting instructions before the meeting. If you do not provide us with your voting instructions, we will vote your shares at our discretion on those proposals we are permitted to vote on by New York Stock Exchange rules.
If you sign and return this form, we will vote any unmarked items based on the board’s recommendations.
If your securities are held by a bank, your securities cannot be voted without your specific instructions.
FOOT LOCKER, INC.
THIS IS A VOTING INSTRUCTION FORM.
You are receiving this voting instruction form because you hold shares in theabove Security. You have the right to vote on proposals being presented at theupcoming Annual Meeting to be held on 05/22/19 at 09:00 A.M. EDT
Make your vote count.
Vote must be received by05/21/2019to be counted.
    
Visit
www.ProxyVote.com
Call
1-800-454-8683
Return this form
in the enclosed
postage-paid
envelope.
Vote in person
the day of the
meeting.
 Scan to view materials and vote via smartphone.
Voting on www.ProxyVote.com is easy and fast!
Go to www.ProxyVote.com, enter the
control number above and vote!
The following proxy material for the meeting are available at www.ProxyVote.com:
PROXY STATEMENT, ANNUAL REPORT

X
E74197-P16040
THIS VOTING INSTRUCTION FORM IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. PLEASE USE BLUE OR BLACK INK AND RETURN ONLY THE BOTTOM PORTION.

FOOT LOCKER, INC.
The Board recommends you vote FOR the following proposal(s): 1 through 3
1.Election of Ten Directors to Serve for One-Year Terms.
NomineesForWithhold
1a.Maxine Clark
1b.Alan D. Feldman
1c.Richard A. Johnson
1d.Guillermo G. Marmol
1e.Matthew M. McKenna
1f.Steven Oakland
1g.Ulice Payne, Jr.
1h.Cheryl Nido Turpin
1i.Kimberly Underhill
1j.Dona D. Young
Yes No
HOUSEHOLDING ELECTION - Please indicate if you consent to receive certain future investor communications in a single package per household. ☐

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]Date
Please check this box if you plan to attend the Meeting and vote these shares in person.
ForAgainstAbstain
2.Advisory Approval of the Company’s Executive Compensation.
3.Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.